A 0.150 kg cube of ice (frozen water) is floating in glycerin. The glycerin is in a tall cylinder that has inside radius 3.50 cm. The level of the glycerin is well below the top of the cylinder. The change in height of the liquid in the cylinder when the ice completely melts is approximately 0.129 meters.
Let's calculate the change in height of the liquid in the cylinder when the ice cube completely melts.
Given:
Mass of the ice cube (m) = 0.150 kg
Radius of the cylinder (r) = 3.50 cm = 0.035 m
To calculate the change in height, we need to determine the volume of the ice cube. Since the ice is floating, its volume is equal to the volume of the liquid it displaces.
Density of water (ρ_water) = 1000 kg/m^3 (approximately)
Volume of the ice cube (V_ice) = m / ρ_water
V_ice = 0.150 kg / 1000 kg/m^3 = 0.000150 m^3
Next, we can calculate the change in height of the liquid in the cylinder when the ice melts.
Change in height (Δh) = V_ice / (π × r^2)
Δh = 0.000150 m^3 / (π × (0.035 m)^2)
Δh ≈ 0.129 m
The change in height of the liquid in the cylinder when the ice completely melts is approximately 0.129 meters.
To learn more about volume visit: https://brainly.com/question/14197390
#SPJ11
At which points in space does destructive interference occur for coherent electromagnetic waves (EM waves) with a single wavelength λ ? A. where their path length differences are 2λ B. where their path length differences are λ C. where their path length differences are even integer multiples of λ/2 D. where their path length differences are odd integer multiples of λ/2
Therefore, the correct option is D, where their path length differences are odd integer multiples of λ/2.
The correct answer to the given question is option D, where their path length differences are odd integer multiples of λ/2.In interference, two waves meet with each other, and the amplitude of the resultant wave depends on the phase difference between the two waves.
In the case of constructive interference, the phase difference between the two waves is a multiple of 2π, and in destructive interference, the phase difference is a multiple of π. For electromagnetic waves, destructive interference occurs when the path length difference between two waves is an odd integer multiple of half of the wavelength.
The expression for destructive interference can be written as follows:Δx = (2n + 1)λ/2Here, Δx represents the path length difference, n represents an integer, and λ represents the wavelength of the wave.Therefore, the correct option is D, where their path length differences are odd integer multiples of λ/2.
to know more about wavelength
https://brainly.com/question/1206358
#SPJ11
A Find the Resistance of 100 meters of # 18 AWG Copper wire at 20° C ? B Find the Area you need to calculate the Resistance ? C Find the Resistance of 600 meters of solid Copper wire with a diameter of 5 mm ? P Find the Area you need to calculate the Resistance ? If the Resistance of some Copper wire is 80 ohms at 20° C, what is it's Resistance at 100° C ?
a. The resistance of 100 meters of #18 AWG Copper wire at 20°C is 0.2098 Ω
b. To calculate the resistance of a wire, the cross-sectional area of the wire is required.
c. The area required to calculate the resistance is 2.155 × [tex]10^{-10}[/tex] m². The resistance of copper wire at 100°C is 92.2 Ω.
a. The resistance of 100 meters of #18 AWG Copper wire at 20°C can be determined using the formula;
R = ρL/A
A = πr²ρ
where;
R = resistance
ρ = resistivity
L = length of the wire
A = area of cross-section
r = radius of the wire
Substituting the given values;
Length of wire L = 100 meters
Area of cross-section A = ?
Diameter of wire d = 0.0403 inches or 1.02462 mm
Cross-sectional area A = πd²/4 = π(1.02462 mm)²/4 = 0.8231 mm²
Resistivity ρ = 1.724 x [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] Ω-m (at 20°C for copper)
Thus;
R = ρL/A = 1.724 x [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] Ω-m x 100 meters / 0.8231 mm²R = 0.2098 Ω
a. The resistance of 100 meters of #18 AWG Copper wire at 20°C is 0.2098 Ω
b. To calculate the resistance of a wire, the cross-sectional area of the wire is required.
c. To find the resistance of 600 meters of solid Copper wire with a diameter of 5 mm, we need to know the cross-sectional area of the wire. The formula for the cross-sectional area is;
A = πr²A = π(5/2)²A = 19.63 mm²
The resistivity of copper is 1.724 × [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] Ωm. Using the formula;
R = ρL/A
where;
L = 600 mA = 19.63 mm²
ρ = 1.724 × [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] Ωm
R = 0.16 ΩP.
To find the area required to calculate the resistance, the cross-sectional area of the wire is required. If the resistance of copper wire is 80 ohms at 20°C, we can use the above formula for resistivity.
ρ = RA/L
where;
R = 80 Ω
A = ?
L = 1 m
ρ = 1.724 × [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] Ωm
A = ρL/R = 1.724 × [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] × 1/80A = 2.155 × [tex]10^{-10}[/tex] m²
The resistance of copper wire at 100°C can be determined using the formula;
Rt = R0 [1 + α(T[tex]_{t}[/tex] - T[tex]_{0}[/tex])]
where;
R0 = resistance at 20°C = 80 Ω
T0 = temperature at 20°C = 293 K (20 + 273)
Tt = temperature at 100°C = 373 K (100 + 273)
α = temperature coefficient of copper = 0.00393/°C
Rt = 80 [1 + 0.00393(373 - 293)]R[tex]_{t}[/tex] = 92.2 Ω
Answer:
Therefore area required to calculate the resistance is 2.155 × [tex]10^{-10}[/tex] m². The resistance of copper wire at 100°C is 92.2 Ω.
learn more about resistivity of copper here:
https://brainly.com/question/29083449
#SPJ11
A laser with wavelength 656 nm is incident on a diffraction grating with 1600 lines/mm.
(a) (15 points) Find the smallest distance from the grating that a converging lens with focal length of 20 cm be placed so that the diffracted laser light converges to a point 1.0 meter from the grating.
(b) (15 points) If a screen is placed at the location from part (a), how far apart will the two first order beams appear on the screen? (If you did not solve part (a), use a distance of 0.5 m).
(a) The converging lens should be placed at a distance of 1.95 meters from the diffraction grating to converge the diffracted laser light to a point 1.0 meter from the grating.
(b) The two first-order beams will appear approximately 0.04 meters (or 4 cm) apart on the screen.
(a) To determine the smallest distance for placing the converging lens, we can use the lens formula:
1/f = 1/v - 1/u,
where f is the focal length of the lens, v is the image distance, and u is the object distance. In this case, the lens will form an image of the diffracted laser light at a distance of 1.0 meter from the grating (v = 1.0 m). We need to find the object distance (u) that will produce this image location.
Using the diffraction grating equation:
d * sin(θ) = m * λ,
where d is the spacing between the grating lines, θ is the angle of diffraction, m is the order of the diffracted beam, and λ is the wavelength of the laser light. Rearranging the equation, we have:
sin(θ) = m * λ / d.
For the first-order beam (m = 1), we can substitute the values of λ = 656 nm (or 656 × 10^(-9) m) and d = 1/1600 mm (or 1.6 × 10^(-6) m) into the equation:
sin(θ) = (1 * 656 × 10^(-9)) / (1.6 × 10^(-6)).
Solving for θ, we find the angle of diffraction for the first-order beam. Using this angle, we can then determine the object distance u by trigonometry:
u = d / tan(θ).
Plugging in the values, we can calculate u. Finally, subtracting the object distance u from the image distance v, we get the required distance from the grating to the converging lens.
(b) Once we have the converging lens in place, we can calculate the separation between the two first-order beams on the screen. The distance between adjacent bright spots in the interference pattern can be determined by:
Δy = λ * L / d,
where Δy is the separation between the bright spots, λ is the wavelength of the laser light, L is the distance from the grating to the screen, and d is the spacing between the grating lines.
Substituting the values of λ = 656 nm (or 656 × 10^(-9) m), L = 1.95 m (the distance from the grating to the converging lens), and d = 1/1600 mm (or 1.6 × 10^(-6) m), we can calculate Δy. The resulting value will give us the distance between the two first-order beams on the screen.
Learn more about lens here:
https://brainly.com/question/29834071
#SPJ11
The magnetic field is 1.50uT at a distance 42.6 cm away from a long, straight wire. At what distance is it 0.150mT ? 4.26×10 2
cm Previous Tries the middle of the straight cord, in the plane of the two wires. Tries 2/10 Previous Tries
The magnetic field strength of [tex]0.150 \mu T[/tex] is achieved at a distance of approximately 13.48 cm from the long, straight wire.
The magnetic field generated by a long, straight wire decreases with distance according to the inverse square law. This means that as the distance from the wire increases, the magnetic field strength decreases.
For calculating distance at which the magnetic field strength is [tex]0.150 \mu T[/tex], a proportion is set using the given information. Denote the distance from the wire where the field strength is[tex]0.150 \mu T[/tex] as x.
According to the inverse square law, the magnetic field strength (B) is inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) from the wire. Therefore, following proportion can be set as:
[tex](B_1/B_2) = (r_2^2/r_1^2)[/tex]
Plugging in the given values,
[tex](1.50 \mu T/0.150 \mu T) = (42.6 cm)^2/x^2[/tex]
Simplifying the proportion:
[tex]10 = (42.6 cm)^2/x^2[/tex]
For finding x, rearrange the equation:
[tex]x^2 = (42.6 cm)^2/10\\x^2 = 181.476 cm^2[/tex]
Taking the square root of both sides,
x ≈ 13.48 cm
Learn more about magnetic fields here:
https://brainly.com/question/19542022
#SPJ11
A sound source is detected at a level of 54 dB Intensity of 2512-07 W/m?) when there is no background noise. How much will the sound level increase if there were 53,5 dB (Intensity of 2.239-07 W/m?) b
If the sound level increases from 54 dB (intensity of 2.512×10⁻⁷ W/m²) to 53.5 dB (intensity of 2.239×10⁻⁷ W/m²), the sound level will increase by approximately 0.5 dB.
Sound level is measured in decibels (dB), which is a logarithmic scale used to express the intensity or power of sound. The formula to calculate the change in sound level in decibels is ΔL = 10 × log₁₀(I/I₀), where ΔL is the change in sound level, I am the final intensity, and I₀ is the reference intensity.
Given that the initial sound level is 54 dB, we can calculate the initial intensity using the formula I₀ = 10^(L₀/10). Similarly, we can calculate the final intensity using the given sound level of 53.5 dB.
Using the formulas, we find that the initial intensity is 2.512×10⁻⁷ W/m² and the final intensity is 2.239×10⁻⁷ W/m².
Substituting these values into the formula to calculate the change in sound level, we get ΔL = 10 × log₁₀(2.239×10⁻⁷ / 2.512×10⁻⁷) ≈ 0.5 dB.
Therefore, the sound level will increase by approximately 0.5 dB when the intensity changes from 2.512×10⁻⁷ W/m² to 2.239×10⁻⁷ W/m².
To know more about sound level click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32444205
#SPJ11
Two long parallel wires carry currents of 7.0 A in opposite
directions. They are separated by 80.0 cm. What is the magnetic
field (in T) in between the wires at a point that is 27.0 cm from
one wire?
When two long parallel wires carry current in opposite directions, they will produce a magnetic field.
The formula to determine the magnetic field is given as follows:
B = µI/(2πr)
In the given problem,µ = 4π x 10⁻⁷ Tm/AT is the permeability of free space
I = 7 A is the current in each wire
The distance between the wires is 80 cm, which is equivalent to 0.80 m.
The magnetic field at a point located 27.0 cm from one wire can be calculated by applying the above formula.
Substitute the known values into the equation:
B = (4π x 10⁻⁷ Tm/AT) x (7.0 A)/[2π(0.27 m)]
B = 5.5 x 10⁻⁴ T
Therefore, the magnetic field at a point that is 27.0 cm from one wire is 5.5 x 10⁻⁴ T in between the wires.
Learn more about magnetic field here
https://brainly.in/question/7549043
#SPJ11
Calculate the resistance of a wire which has a uniform diameter 11.62mm and a length of 75.33cm if the resistivity is known to be 0.00083 ohm.m. Give your answer in units of Ohms up to 3 decimals. Taken as 3.1416
The resistance of the wire is 2.007 Ohms.
To calculate the resistance of the wire, we can use the formula R = (ρ × L) / A, where R is the resistance, ρ is the resistivity, L is the length of the wire, and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire.
First, let's calculate the cross-sectional area of the wire. The diameter is given as 11.62 mm, which corresponds to a radius of 5.81 mm or 0.00581 m. The formula for the area of a circle is A = π × [tex]r^{2}[/tex], where r is the radius. Substituting the values, we have A = 3.1416 × [tex](0.00581 m)^{2}[/tex].
Next, we can substitute the given values into the resistance formula. The resistivity is given as 0.00083 ohm.m and the length is 75.33 cm, which is equal to 0.7533 m.
Calculating the resistance, we have R = (0.00083 ohm.m × 0.7533 m) / (3.1416 × [tex](0.00581 m)^{2}[/tex]).
Performing the calculations, the resistance of the wire is approximately 2.007 ohms (rounded to 3 decimal places). Therefore, the resistance of the wire is 2.007 Ohms.
Learn more about resistance here:
https://brainly.com/question/29427458
#SPJ11
Give an example where first the speed of the object increases, then emains constant for some time and then decrease.
At what absolute temperature do the Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature scales give the same numerical value? What is the value? (include a minus sign if required.) The Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature scales give the same numerical value at an absolute temperature of The Celsius temperature is ∘C. The Fahrenheit temperature is
The Celsius temperature is -40 degrees Celsius, and the Fahrenheit temperature is also -40 degrees Fahrenheit at this absolute temperature.
To find the absolute temperature at which the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales give the same numerical value, we can set up an equation and solve for the unknown temperature. The relationship between Celsius (C) and Fahrenheit (F) temperatures is given by the equation:
F = (9/5)C + 32
Since we want the Celsius and Fahrenheit temperatures to be equal, we can set up the equation:
C = (9/5)C + 32
To solve for C, we can simplify the equation:
C - (9/5)C = 32
(5/5)C - (9/5)C = 32
(-4/5)C = 32
Now we can solve for C:
C = 32 × (-5/4)
C = -40
Therefore, the Celsius temperature is -40 degrees Celsius, and the Fahrenheit temperature is also -40 degrees Fahrenheit at this absolute temperature.
To know more about temperature
https://brainly.com/question/27944554
#SPJ4
A certan lons focusos I ght from an object. 175 m away as an image 49.3 cm on the other side of the lens Part E What is its focal longth? Follow the sign conventions Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units Is the image real or virtual? virtual real A−6.80−D lens is held 14.5 cm from an ant 1.00 mm high. Find the image distance. Follow the sign conventions. Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.
Focal length formula, `1/f = 1/v + 1/u`Sign conventions:1. Object distance `u` is negative if the object is placed to the left of the lens.2. Image distance `v` = 0.00339 cm.
A certain lens focuses a light from an object 175 m away as an image 49.3 cm on the other side of the lens.
Formula used:focal length formula, `1/f = 1/v + 1/u`Sign conventions:1. Object distance `u` is negative if the object is placed to the left of the lens.2.
Image distance `v` is positive if the image is formed on the opposite side of the lens to that of the object.3.
Focal length `f` is negative for a concave lens and positive for a convex lens.A certain lens focuses a light from an object 175 m away as an image 49.3 cm on the other side of the lens.
Using formula,`1/f = 1/v + 1/u``1/f = 1/49.3 - 1/175`(taking v = 49.3 cm and u = -17500 cm)`1/f = (175 - 49.3)/(175 × 49.3)` `= 125.7/(8627.5)` `= 0.01457``f = 1/0.01457``f = 68.75 cm
Focal length of the lens is 68.75 cm. The image is real or virtual can be determined by the sign of `v`.
Here,`v > 0` ⇒ Image is formed on the opposite side of the lens to that of the object. Therefore, the image is real.
virutal A −6.80 D lens is held 14.5 cm from an ant 1.00 mm high.Using the lens formula,`1/f = 1/v + 1/u``
Given, `f = - 6.80 D``1/f = - 0.1471 cm⁻¹` (`D` is dioptre)`u = - 14.5 cm` (object distance) (image distance)
From the lens formula,`1/f = 1/v + 1/u``1/v = 1/f - 1/u``v = 1/(1/f - 1/u)`Substituting values,`v = 1/(1/(- 0.1471) - 1/(- 14.5))``v = 0.00339 cm
Image distance `v` = 0.00339 cm.
Learn more about concave lens here:
https://brainly.com/question/2919483
#SPJ11
The strength of the Earth's magnetic field has an average value on the surface of about 5×10 5
T. Assume this magnetic field by taking the Earth's core to be a current loop, with a radius equal to the radius of the core. How much electric current must this current loop carry to generate the Earth's observed magnetic field? Given the Earth's core has a radius of approximately R core
=3x10 6
m. (Assume the current in the core as a single current loop).
Summary: To generate the Earth's observed magnetic field, the current loop representing the Earth's core needs to carry an electric current of approximately 1.57x10^6 Amperes.
The strength of a magnetic field generated by a current loop can be calculated using Ampere's law. According to Ampere's law, the magnetic field strength (B) at a point on the loop's axis is directly proportional to the current (I) flowing through the loop and inversely proportional to the distance (r) from the loop's center. The equation for the magnetic field strength of a current loop is given by B = (μ₀ * I * N) / (2π * r), where μ₀ is the permeability of free space, N is the number of turns in the loop (assumed to be 1 in this case), and r is the radius of the loop.
In this scenario, the Earth's core is assumed to be a single current loop with a radius (r) equal to the radius of the core, which is given as R_core = 3x10^6 meters. The average magnetic field strength on the Earth's surface is given as 5x10^-5 Tesla. Rearranging the equation for B, we can solve for I: I = (2π * B * r) / (μ₀ * N). Plugging in the given values, we get I = (2π * 5x10^-5 Tesla * 3x10^6 meters) / (4π * 10^-7 T m/A). Simplifying the expression gives us I ≈ 1.57x10^6 Amperes, which represents the electric current required for the Earth's core to generate the observed magnetic field.
Learn more about electric current here:
https://brainly.com/question/14848188
#SPJ11
Suppose 2000 J of heat are added to 3.4 mol of argon gas at a constant pressure of 140 kPa. Part A Find the change in internal energy. Part B Find the change in temperature for this gas. Express your answer using two significant figures
Part C Calculate the change in volume of the gas.
The resulting change in temperature of the argon gas is approximately 34.62 Kelvin.
To determine the change in temperature of the argon gas, we can use the formula:
ΔQ = nCpΔT
where:
ΔQ is the heat added to the gas (in joules),
n is the number of moles of the gas,
Cp is the molar specific heat capacity of the gas at constant pressure (in joules per mole per kelvin),
ΔT is the change in temperature (in kelvin).
In this case, we have:
ΔQ = 2000 J
n = 3.4 mol
Cp (specific heat capacity of argon at constant pressure) = 20.8 J/(mol·K) (approximately)
We need to rearrange the formula to solve for ΔT:
ΔT = ΔQ / (nCp)
Substituting the given values into the equation, we have:
ΔT = 2000 J / (3.4 mol * 20.8 J/(mol·K))
Calculating the result:
ΔT ≈ 34.62 K
To know more about argon gas, here
brainly.com/question/29791626
#SPJ4
--The complete Question is, Suppose 2000 J of heat are added to 3.4 mol of argon gas at a constant pressure of 140 kPa. What will be the resulting change in temperature of the gas? Assume the argon gas behaves ideally.--
Find the attached image illustrates the thermal resistance model for two devices mounded on single heatsink : Tj1 1 kQ 1 kQ www ww Rjc1 Device Ta 1 KQ 1 www Rsa Tj2 1kQ 1 ΚΩ www www Rcs2 Device Rjc2 2 Where, * Tj1 - Device 1 junction temperature = 180°C * Tj2 - Device 2 junction temperature = 180°C * Rjc1 - Device 1 junction to case thermal resistance = 4 K/W * Rjc2 - Device 2 junction to case thermal resistance = 2 K/W * Rcs1,Rcs2 - Device 1 and device 2 case to heatsink thermal resistance (heatsink grease) = 0.038 K/W * Rsa - heat sink thermal resistance ( need to be find). * Ta - ambient temperature = 40°C * The formula for heatsink (as specifically available based on its thermal resistance, Rsa) is * Rsa = Tj1 - Ta - Pd1 (Rjc1 + Rcs1)/(Pd1 + Pd2) Where, * Pd1 - power dissipated by device 1 * Pd2 - power dissipated by device 2 * Then, * Rsa = 180 - 40 - 16(4+0.038) / (16+24) * Rsa = 1.88 K/W * The heatsink thermal resistance (Rsa) = 1.88 K/W. Rcs1
Two MOSFETS are used to control the brightness of a high power spotlight. Under maximum power both MOSFETS in the circuit as shown are conducting. M1 dissipates a maximum of 16 W and has a junction to case thermal resistance of 4 K/W. M2 dissipates a maximum of 24 W and has a junction to case thermal resistance of 2 K/W. Both MOSFETs are mounted on a common heatsink (with isolation). The maximum junction temperature of the MOSFETs is 180 °C and the circuit must operate in an ambient temperature of 40 °C. Please assist with getting the required heatsink. A thermal circuit will aid my understanding so please draw the thermal circuit first.
The problem involves two MOSFETs mounted on a common heatsink, and the goal is to determine the required thermal resistance of the heatsink.
Given the power dissipation and thermal resistance values of the MOSFETs, along with the maximum junction temperature and ambient temperature, the thermal circuit needs to be analyzed to find the required heatsink thermal resistance.
To analyze the thermal circuit and determine the required heatsink thermal resistance, we can start by visualizing the circuit as a thermal network. The key components in the circuit are the MOSFETs (M1 and M2), their junction-to-case thermal resistances (Rjc1 and Rjc2), the case-to-heatsink thermal resistances (Rcs1 and Rcs2), and the unknown heatsink thermal resistance (Rsa). We also have the maximum junction temperature (Tj1 = Tj2 = 180°C) and the ambient temperature (Ta = 40°C).By applying the thermal circuit equations, we can write the following expression to calculate Rsa:
Rsa = (Tj1 - Ta - Pd1 * (Rjc1 + Rcs1)) / Pd1
where Pd1 is the power dissipated by device M1 (16 W) and Rjc1 is the junction-to-case thermal resistance of M1 (4 K/W). We can substitute these values into the equation and solve for Rsa.
Similarly, for M2, we have:
Rsa = (Tj2 - Ta - Pd2 * (Rjc2 + Rcs2)) / Pd2
where Pd2 is the power dissipated by device M2 (24 W) and Rjc2 is the junction-to-case thermal resistance of M2 (2 K/W).
Once we have the values of Rsa from both equations, we can compare them and choose the larger value as the required heatsink thermal resistance to ensure proper heat dissipation and keep the MOSFETs within their maximum temperature limits.
In conclusion, by constructing the thermal circuit and applying the thermal equations, we can determine the required heatsink thermal resistance (Rsa) to keep the MOSFETs within their temperature limits. This ensures the reliable operation of the circuit under the given power dissipation and ambient temperature conditions. The thermal circuit analysis helps in understanding the heat flow and designing effective cooling solutions to maintain the components at safe operating temperatures.
Learn more about resistance here:- brainly.com/question/29427458
#SPJ11
Explain how P and S waves reflect and refract at horizontal
layers where velocity increases and where velocity decreases.
Seismic waves, including P and S waves, exhibit distinct behaviors when encountering horizontal layers with changing velocity. P waves reflect and refract at such layers, while S waves reflect and are unable to pass through them, explaining why only P waves can be detected from earthquakes on the other side of the Earth.
Seismic waves are mechanical waves that propagate through the Earth's crust. They are created by earthquakes, explosions, and other types of disturbances that cause ground motion. There are two types of seismic waves, namely P and S waves. These waves behave differently when they encounter horizontal layers where the velocity changes.
P waves reflect and refract at horizontal layers where the velocity increases and decreases. When a P wave enters a layer with an increasing velocity, its wavefronts become curved, and it refracts downwards towards the normal to the interface. The opposite happens when a P wave enters a layer with a decreasing velocity. Its wavefronts become curved, and it refracts upwards away from the normal to the interface. When a P wave encounters a horizontal boundary, it reflects and undergoes a 180° phase shift.
S waves reflect and refract at horizontal layers where the velocity increases, but they cannot pass through layers where the velocity decreases to zero. When an S wave enters a layer with an increasing velocity, it refracts downwards towards the normal to the interface. However, when an S wave encounters a layer with a decreasing velocity, it cannot pass through and reflects back. Therefore, S waves cannot pass through the Earth's liquid outer core, which is why we can only detect P waves from earthquakes on the other side of the Earth.
In summary, P and S waves behave differently when they encounter horizontal layers where the velocity changes. P waves reflect and refract at such layers, while S waves reflect and cannot pass through them.
Learn more about Seismic waves
https://brainly.com/question/19578626
#SPJ11
A beam of ultraviolet light with a power of 2.50 W and a wavelength of 124 nm shines on a metal surface. The maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons is 4.16 eV. (a) What is the work function of this metal, in eV?
(b) Assuming that each photon ejects one electron, what is the current?
(c) If the power, but not the wavelength, were reduced by half, what would be the current?
(d) If the wavelength, but not the power, were reduced by half, what would be the current?
The energy required to eject an electron from a metal surface is known as the work function. To find the work function of this metal, we can use the formula:
Work function = hυ - KEMax
Work function = hυ - KEMax
Power of ultraviolet light = 2.50 Wavelength of ultraviolet light = 124 nm Maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons = 4.16 eV Planck's constant (h) = 6.626 × 10^-34 Js Speed of light (c) = 3 × 10^8 m/s
The energy of a photon is given by
E = hυ = hc/λ where h = Planck's constant, υ = frequency of light, c = speed of light and λ = wavelength of light.
We have to convert the wavelength of ultraviolet light from nm to m.
Therefore, λ = 124 nm × 10^-9 m/nm = 1.24 × 10^-7 m
The frequency of the ultraviolet light can be calculated by using the above equation.
υ = c/λ = (3 × 10^8 m/s)/(1.24 × 10^-7 m) = 2.42 × 10^15 Hz
Now, we can substitute these values in the formula for work function:
Work function = hυ - KEMax= 6.626 × 10^-34 Js × 2.42 × 10^15 Hz - 4.16 eV× (1.602 × 10^-19 J/eV)= 1.607 × 10^-18 J - 6.656 × 10^-20 J= 1.54 × 10^-18 J
The work function of this metal is 1.54 × 10^-18 J
The current is given by the formula:
I = nAq where I = current, n = number of electrons per second, A = area of metal surface, and q = charge on an electron
The number of photons per second can be calculated by dividing the power of ultraviolet light by the energy of one photon.
Therefore, n = P/E = (2.50 W)/(hc/λ) = (2.50 W)λ/(hc)
The area of the metal surface is not given, but we can assume it to be 1 cm^2. Therefore, A = 1 cm^2 = 10^-4 m^2.The charge on an electron is q = -1.6 × 10^-19 C. The current can now be calculated by substituting these values in the formula:
I = nAq= (2.50 W)λ/(hc) × 10^-4 m^2 × (-1.6 × 10^-19 C)= -4.03 × 10^-13 A
Current is 4.03 × 10^-13 A.
Note that the value of current is negative because electrons have a negative charge.
If the power, but not the wavelength, were reduced by half, then the number of photons per second would be halved. Therefore, the current would also be halved. The new current would be 2.02 × 10^-13 A.
If the wavelength, but not the power, were reduced by half, then the energy of each photon would be doubled. Therefore, the number of photons per second required to produce the same power would be halved. Hence, the current would also be halved. The new current would be 2.02 × 10^-13 A.
Learn further here: https://brainly.com/question/25748529
#SPJ11
Time-dependent Schrödinger's equation depends only on x. In contrast, Time- independent Schrödinger's equation depends on x and t
The time-dependent Schrödinger's equation is dependent only on position (x), while the time-independent Schrödinger's equation is dependent on both position (x) and time (t).
In quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger's equation describes the behavior of a quantum system. The time-dependent Schrödinger's equation, also known as wave equation, is given by:
iħ ∂ψ/∂t = -ħ²/2m ∂²ψ/∂x² + V(x)ψ,
The time-dependent Schrödinger's equation describes how the wave function evolves with time, allowing us to analyze dynamics and time evolution of quantum systems.
On the other hand, the time-independent Schrödinger's equation, also known as the stationary state equation, is used to find energy eigenstates and corresponding eigenvalues of a quantum system. It is given by:
-ħ²/2m ∂²ψ/∂x² + V(x)ψ = Eψ,
The time-independent Schrödinger's equation is independent of time, meaning it describes stationary, time-invariant solutions of a quantum system, such as the energy levels and wave functions of bound states.
Learn more about dependent here;
https://brainly.com/question/30958236
#SPJ11
At what cold-reservoir temperature (in ∘C∘C) would a Carnot engine with a hot-reservoir temperature of 497 ∘C∘C have an efficiency of 60.0 %%?
Express your answer using two significant figures.
Answer: The cold-reservoir temperature (in ∘C) for the given Carnot engine with a hot-reservoir temperature of 497 ∘C and 60.0 % efficiency is 35°C.
Hot-reservoir temperature, Th = 497 ∘C.
Efficiency, η = 60.0%.
Cold-reservoir temperature, Tc = ?.
Carnot engine is given by the efficiency of Carnot engine is given asη = 1 - Tc/Th
Where,η is the efficiency of Carnot engine. Th is the high-temperature reservoir temperature in Kelvin. Tc is the low-temperature reservoir temperature in Kelvin.
Calculation: the high-temperature reservoir temperature is Th = 497 °C = 497 + 273.15 K = 770.15 K
The efficiency of the engine is η = 60% = 0.60. We need to find the low-temperature reservoir temperature in °C = Tc. Substituting the given values in the formula: 0.60 = 1 - Tc/Th0.60 (Th)
= Th - Tc Tc
= 0.40 (Th)Tc
= 0.40 × 770.15 K
= 308.06 K
Converting Tc to Celsius, Tc = 308.06 K - 273.15 = 34.91°C ≈ 35°C
The cold-reservoir temperature (in ∘C) for the given Carnot engine with a hot-reservoir temperature of 497 ∘C and 60.0 % efficiency is 35°C.
Learn more about Carnot engine: https://brainly.com/question/25819144
#SPJ11
The current density in a copper wire of radius 0.700 mm is uniform. The wire's length is 5.00 m, the end-to-end potential difference is 0.150 V, and the density of conduction electrons is 8.60×10 28
m −3
. How long does an electron take (on the average) to travel the length of the wire? Number Units
On average, an electron takes approximately 4.63 × 10^(-6) seconds to travel the length of the copper wire. To find the time taken for an electron to cross the size of the wire, we need to calculate the drift velocity of the electrons and then use it to determine the time.
To determine the time it takes for an electron to travel the length of the wire, we need to calculate the average drift velocity of the electrons first.
The current density (J) in the wire can be related to the drift velocity (v_d) and the charge carrier density (n) using the equation:
J = n * e * v_d
where e is the elementary charge (1.6 × [tex]10^{(-19)[/tex] C).
The drift velocity can be expressed as:
v_d = I / (n * A)
where I is the current, n is the density of conduction electrons, and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire.
The current (I) can be calculated using Ohm's law:
I = V / R
where V is the potential difference (0.150 V) and R is the resistance of the wire.
The resistance (R) can be determined using the formula:
R = (ρ * L) / A
where ρ is the resistivity of copper, L is the length of the wire (5.00 m), and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire (π * [tex]r^2[/tex], with r being the radius of the wire).
Now, we can calculate the drift velocity:
v_d = (V / R) / (n * A)
Next, we can determine the time it takes for an electron to travel the length of the wire (t):
t = L / v_d
Substituting the given values and performing the calculations:
t = (5.00 m) / [(0.150 V / ((ρ * 5.00 m) / (π *[tex](0.700 mm)^2[/tex]))) / (8.60 × [tex]10^{28[/tex][tex]m^{(-3)[/tex]* π *[tex](0.700 mm)^2[/tex])]
t ≈ 4.63 ×[tex]10^{(-6)[/tex] s
Therefore, on average, an electron takes approximately 4.63 × [tex]10^{(-6)[/tex]seconds to travel the length of the copper wire.
Learn About drift velocity Here:
https://brainly.com/question/4269562
#SPJ11
A sharp image is located 391 mm behind a 255- mm -focal-length converging lens. Find the object distance. Follow the sign conventions.
A sharp image is located 391 mm behind a 255- mm -focal-length converging lens. the object distance is approximately -733 mm, indicating that the object is a virtual object located 733 mm to the left (opposite side) of the lens.
In optics, the sign convention is used to determine the direction and sign of various quantities. According to the sign convention:
- Distances to the left of the lens are considered negative, while distances to the right are positive.
- Focal length (f) of a converging lens is positive.
- Object distance (p) is positive for real objects on the same side as the incident light and negative for virtual objects on the opposite side.
Given that the focal length (f) of the converging lens is +255 mm and the image distance (q) is -391 mm (since the image is located behind the lens), we can use the lens formula:
1/f = 1/p + 1/q.
Substituting the known values into the equation, we have:
1/255 = 1/p + 1/-391.
To find the object distance (p), we rearrange the equation:
1/p = 1/255 - 1/-391.
To combine the fractions, we take the common denominator:
1/p = (391 - 255) / (255 * -391).
Simplifying the equation:
1/p = 136 / (255 * -391).
Taking the reciprocal of both sides:
p = (255 * -391) / 136.
Evaluating the expression:
p ≈ -733 mm.
Therefore, the object distance is approximately -733 mm, indicating that the object is a virtual object located 733 mm to the left (opposite side) of the lens.
Learn more about Focal length here:
https://brainly.com/question/2194024
#SPJ11
Find the speed (in terms of c) of a particle (for example, an electron) whose relativistic kinetic energy KE is 5 times its rest energy E in - -
. For example, if the speed is 0.500c, enter only 0.500. Keep 3 digits after the decimal point.
The speed of the particle is approximately 0.993c.
According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the relativistic kinetic energy (KE) of a particle can be expressed as KE = (γ - 1)[tex]mc^2[/tex], where γ is the Lorentz factor and m is the rest mass of the particle.
We are given that the kinetic energy is 5 times the rest energy, which can be expressed as KE = 5[tex]mc^2[/tex].Setting these two equations equal to each other, we have (γ - 1)[tex]mc^2[/tex] = 5[tex]mc^2[/tex]. Simplifying, we get γ - 1 = 5, which leads to γ = 6.
The Lorentz factor γ is defined as γ = 1/√[tex](1 - v^2/c^2)[/tex], where v is the velocity of the particle. We can rearrange this equation to solve for v: v = c√(1 - 1/γ^2).
Plugging in γ = 6, we find v ≈ 0.993c. Therefore, the speed of the particle is approximately 0.993c.
Learn more about speed here ;
https://brainly.com/question/32673092
#SPJ11
Complete each statement with the correct term. A collision in which some kinetic energy is lost is a(n)_____collision. A collision in which the objects become one and move together is a(n)_____inelastic collision.
Figure 4.1 shows three charged particles located at the three corners of a rectangle. Find the electric field at the fourth vacant corner. (25 points) q 1
=3.00nC
q 2
=5.00nC
q 3
=6.00nC
x=0.600m
y=0.200m
Figure 4.1
The electric field at the fourth vacant corner is 4.05 × 10⁵ N/C.
Given,Three charged particles are located at the three corners of a rectangle.The magnitude of q1, q2 and q3 are given as 3 nC, 5 nC and 6 nC respectively.The value of x = 0.6m and the value of y = 0.2m.Figure 4.1The electric field at the fourth vacant corner can be calculated as follows:
We can make use of the formula given below to find the magnitude of the electric field,where k is the Coulomb constant and the magnitude of q1, q2 and q3 are given as 3 nC, 5 nC and 6 nC respectively, The value of x = 0.6m and the value of y = 0.2m. E = kq/r²Where k = 9 × 10⁹ N m²/C²The magnitude of q1, q2 and q3 are given as 3 nC, 5 nC and 6 nC respectively.r₁ = x² + y²r₁ = 0.6² + 0.2²r₁ = √(0.36 + 0.04)r₁ = √0.4r₁ = 0.6324 m r₂ = y²r₂ = 0.2²r₂ = 0.04 mTherefore, the electric field at the fourth vacant corner is 4.05 × 10⁵ N/C (approx).
Thus, the electric field at the fourth vacant corner is 4.05 × 10⁵ N/C.
Learn more about electric field here,
https://brainly.com/question/19878202
#SPJ11
An airplane starts from west on the runway. The engines exorta constant force of 78.0 KN on the body of the plane (mass 9 20 104 KO) during takeofc How far down the runway does the plane reach its takeoff speed of 46.1m/s?
An airplane starts from west on the runway. The engines extort constant force of 78.0 KN on the body of the plane (mass 9 20 104 Kg) during takeoff . The plane reaches its takeoff speed after traveling approximately 1135.17 meters down the runway.
To find the distance the plane travels down the runway to reach its takeoff speed, we can use the equations of motion.
The force exerted by the engines is given as 78.0 kN, which can be converted to Newtons:
Force = 78.0 kN = 78.0 × 10^3 N
The mass of the plane is given as 9.20 × 10^4 kg.
The acceleration of the plane can be determined using Newton's second law:
Force = mass × acceleration
Rearranging the equation, we have:
acceleration = Force / mass
Substituting the given values, we find:
acceleration = (78.0 × 10^3 N) / (9.20 × 10^4 kg)
Now, we can use the equations of motion to find the distance traveled.
The equation that relates distance, initial velocity, final velocity, and acceleration is
v^2 = u^2 + 2as
where:
v = final velocity = 46.1 m/s (takeoff speed)
u = initial velocity = 0 m/s (plane starts from rest)
a = acceleration (calculated above)
s = distance traveled
Plugging in the values, we have:
(46.1 m/s)^2 = (0 m/s)^2 + 2 × acceleration × s
Simplifying the equation, we can solve for 's':
s = (46.1 m/s)^2 / (2 × acceleration)
Calculating this, we find:
s ≈ 1135.17 m
Therefore, the plane reaches its takeoff speed after traveling approximately 1135.17 meters down the runway.
To learn more about Newton's second law visit: https://brainly.com/question/25545050
#SPJ11
An object is located 72 cm from a thin diverging lens along the axis. If a virtual image forms at a distance of 18 cm from the lens, what is the focal length of the lens? in cm Is the image inverted or upright?
The focal length of the lens is -24 cm (negative sign indicates a diverging lens). Regarding the orientation of the image, for a diverging lens, the image formed is always virtual and upright.
To determine the focal length of the lens, we can use the lens formula:
1/f = 1/v - 1/u
where:
f is the focal length of the lens,
v is the distance of the virtual image from the lens (positive for virtual images),
u is the distance of the object from the lens (positive for objects on the same side as the incident light).
Given that the object is located 72 cm from the lens (u = -72 cm) and the virtual image forms at a distance of 18 cm from the lens (v = -18 cm), we can substitute these values into the lens formula:
1/f = 1/-18 - 1/-72
Simplifying this expression:
1/f = -1/18 + 1/72
= (-4 + 1) / 72
= -3/72
= -1/24
Now, taking the reciprocal of both sides of the equation:
f = -24 cm
To know more about focal length
https://brainly.com/question/31755962
#SPJ11
A ring of radius R = 2.20 m carries a charge q = 1.99 nC. At what distance, measured from the center of the ring does the electric field created by the ring reach its maximum value? Enter your answer rounded off to 2 decimal places. Do not type the unit. Consider only the positive distances.
The electric field created by the ring reaches its maximum value at a distance of 1.27 meters from the center of the ring.
The electric field created by a ring with a given radius and charge reaches its maximum value at a distance from the center of the ring. To find this distance, we can use the equation for the electric field due to a ring of charge.
By differentiating this equation with respect to distance and setting it equal to zero, we can solve for the distance at which the electric field is maximum.
The equation for the electric field due to a ring of charge is given by:
E = (k * q * z) / (2 * π * ε * (z² + R²)^(3/2))
where E is the electric field, k is the Coulomb's constant (9 * [tex]10^9[/tex] N m²/C²), q is the charge of the ring, z is the distance from the center of the ring, R is the radius of the ring, and ε is the permittivity of free space (8.85 * [tex]10^{-12}[/tex] C²/N m²).
To find the distance at which the electric field is maximum, we differentiate the equation with respect to z:
dE/dz = (k * q) / (2 * π * ε) * [(3z² - R²) / (z² + R²)^(5/2)]
Setting dE/dz equal to zero and solving for z, we get:
3z² - R² = 0
z² = R²/3
z = √(R²/3)
Substituting the given values, we find:
z = √((2.20 m)² / 3) = 1.27 m
Therefore, the electric field created by the ring reaches its maximum value at a distance of 1.27 meters from the center of the ring.
To learn more about electric field visit:
brainly.com/question/30544719
#SPJ11
A seasoned mini golfer is trying to make par on a tricky hole number 5 . The golfer must complete the hole by getting the ball from the flat section it begins on, up a θ=41.5 ∘
ramp, over a gap, and into the hole, which is d=1.00 m away from the end of the ramp. If the opening of the hole and the top of the ramp are at the same height, h=0.540 m, at what speed v 1
must the ball be moving as it approaches the ramp to land directly in the hole? Assume that the ball rolls without slipping on all surfaces, and once the ball launches off the incline, its angular speed remains constant. The acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s 2
.
The seasoned mini golfer must give the ball an initial speed of approximately 1.95 m/s to land directly in the hole on tricky hole number 5.
To land directly in the hole on tricky hole number 5 of mini golf, the seasoned golfer must launch the ball up a 41.5° ramp with a height of 0.540 m. The ball needs to travel a distance of 1.00 m to reach the hole. Assuming no slipping occurs and the ball maintains constant angular speed after launching, the golfer needs to give the ball an initial speed of approximately 1.95 m/s.
To determine the required initial speed (v1) of the ball, we can break down the problem into two parts: the ball's motion along the ramp and its motion through the air. Firstly, let's consider the motion along the ramp.
The ball moves up the ramp against gravity, and we can analyze its motion using the principles of projectile motion. The vertical component of the initial velocity (v1y) is given by v1y = v1 * sin(θ), where θ is the angle of the ramp. The ball must reach a height of 0.540 m, so using the equation for vertical displacement, we have:
h = (v1y^2) / (2 * g), where g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Solving for v1y, we get v1y = sqrt(2 * g * h). Substituting the given values, we find v1y ≈ 1.30 m/s.
Next, we consider the horizontal motion of the ball. The horizontal component of the initial velocity (v1x) is given by v1x = v1 * cos(θ). The ball needs to travel a horizontal distance of 1.00 m, so using the equation for horizontal displacement, we have:
d = v1x * t, where t is the time of flight.
Rearranging the equation to solve for t, we get t = d / v1x. Substituting the given values, we find t ≈ 0.517 s.
Now, considering the vertical motion, we know that the vertical velocity of the ball just before reaching the hole is zero. Using the equation for vertical velocity, we have:
v2y = v1y - g * t.
Substituting the values we found, we get v2y = 0. To land directly in the hole, the ball should have zero vertical velocity at the end. Therefore, we need to launch the ball with a vertical velocity of v1y ≈ 1.30 m/s.
Finally, to find the required initial speed (v1), we can use the Pythagorean theorem:
v1 = sqrt(v1x^2 + v1y^2).
Substituting the values we found, we get v1 ≈ 1.95 m/s.
Learn more about projectile motion:
https://brainly.com/question/12860905
#SPJ11
Charges Q 1
=−3C and Q 2
=−5C held fixed on a line. A third charge Q 3
=−4C is free to move along the line. Determine if the equilibrium position for Q 3
is a stable or unstable equilibrium. It cannot be determined if the equilibrium is stable or unstable. Stable Unstable There is no equilibrium position.
The equilibrium position for the third charge, Q₃, held fixed on a line between charges Q₁ and Q₂ with values -3C and -5C respectively, can be determined to be an unstable equilibrium.
To determine the stability of the equilibrium position for Q₃, we can examine the forces acting on it. The force experienced by Q₃ due to the electric fields created by Q₁ and Q₂ is given by Coulomb's law:
[tex]\[ F_{13} = k \frac{{Q_1 Q_3}}{{r_{13}^2}} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ F_{23} = k \frac{{Q_2 Q_3}}{{r_{23}^2}} \][/tex]
where F₁₃ and F₂₃ are the forces experienced by Q₃ due to Q₁ and Q₂, k is the electrostatic constant, Q₁, Q₂, and Q₃ are the charges, and r₁₃ and r₂₃ are the distances between Q₁ and Q₃, and Q₂ and Q₃, respectively.
In this case, both Q₁ and Q₂ are negative charges, indicating that the forces experienced by Q₃ are attractive towards Q₁ and Q₂. Since Q₃ is free to move along the line, any slight displacement from the equilibrium position would result in an imbalance of forces, causing Q₃ to experience a net force that drives it further away from the equilibrium position.
This indicates an unstable equilibrium, as the system is inherently unstable and any perturbation leads to an increasing displacement. Therefore, the equilibrium position for Q₃ in this configuration is determined to be an unstable equilibrium.
Learn more about equilibrium here:
https://brainly.com/question/31833470
#SPJ11
A 65 kg skydiver jumps off a plane. After the skydiver opens her parachute, she accelerates downward at 0.4 m/s 2
. What is the force of air resistance acting on the parachute?
The force of air resistance acting on the parachute of a 65 kg skydiver, who is accelerating downward at 0.4 m/s²is 26N. The force of air resistance is equal to the product of the mass and acceleration.
According to Newton's second law of motion, the force acting on an object is equal to the product of its mass and acceleration. In this case, the skydiver has a mass of 65 kg and is accelerating downward at 0.4 m/s². Therefore, the force of air resistance acting on the parachute can be calculated as follows:
F = m * a
F = 65 kg * 0.4 m/s²
F = 26 N
Hence, the force of air resistance acting on the parachute is 26 Newtons. This force opposes the motion of the skydiver and helps to slow down her descent by counteracting the force of gravity. .
Learn more about air resistance here:
https://brainly.com/question/19165683
#SPJ11
An ar thlled totoidal solenoid has a moan radius of 15.4 cm and a Part A Crosis tiectional area of 495 cm 2
as shown in (Figure 1). Picture thes as tive toroidis core around whach the windings are wrapped to form What is the least number of furns that the winding must have? the foroidat solenod The cirrent flowing through it is 122 A, and it is desired that the energy stored within the solenoid be at least 0.393 J Express your answer numerically, as a whole number, to three significant figures,
To determine the least number of turns required for the winding of a toroidal solenoid, we need to consider the current flowing through it, the desired energy stored within the solenoid, and the solenoid's mean radius and cross-sectional area.
The energy stored within a solenoid is given by the formula U = (1/2) * L * I^2, where U is the energy, L is the inductance of the solenoid, and I is the current flowing through it.
For a toroidal solenoid, the inductance is given by L = μ₀ * N^2 * A / (2πr), where μ₀ is the permeability of free space, N is the number of turns, A is the cross-sectional area, and r is the mean radius.
We are given the values for the cross-sectional area (495 cm^2), current (122 A), and desired energy (0.393 J). By rearranging the equation for inductance, we can solve for the least number of turns (N) required to achieve the desired energy.
After substituting the known values into the equation, we can solve for N and round the result to the nearest whole number.
Learn more about toroidal solenoids here:
https://brainly.com/question/31504366
#SPJ11
Objects Cooling in Air Animal Size and Heat Transfer Room temperature T 2
= The miope of yroph in (T− 7
1
T. vs t is oqual to - . Computer Graph: thang Excel to Plos in (T. Ty vs f for (1 in; 2 in and 3 in Spbares). From each 3reph, deternaine the values of f, the conling rates. 3 plets (conviant flots Analyals: if f - D, where r is the cocling rate and D is the diameter ef the sphere, then 10gr=n 69
D. The slope of log rvs
log D
is the power n. r=4−int d=x−int facwill itek of iclationilf. lefoes the slope aid. collanigrate: Computer Graph: Using Excel to Plot log r vs
log D
. Slope = How does the cooling rate, r, depend on the diameter, D, of the sphere? Circle the equation best describes this dependence. r=1/D 3
r=1/D 2
r=1/Dr−Dr=D 2
r=D 3
The cooling rate, r, depends on the diameter, D, of the sphere such that r=D2.
The given slope of log r vs log D is -2. The equation which best describes the dependence of the cooling rate, r, on the diameter, D, of the sphere is given by:r = D2. Explanation: The cooling rate, r, for a given sphere depends on its diameter, D.
The cooling rate can be expressed as: r = k Dn, where k is a proportionality constant and n is the power to which D is raised. We need to find how the cooling rate depends on the diameter of the sphere. The slope of log r vs log D is the power n. Given: Slope of log r vs log D is -2. Therefore, n = -2.The relation between r and D is given as:r = k Dnr = k D-2r = k / D2From the above equation, we can see that the cooling rate is inversely proportional to the square of the diameter. Therefore, the cooling rate, r, depends on the diameter, D, of the sphere such that r = D2.
Thus, the equation which best describes the dependence of the cooling rate, r, on the diameter, D, of the sphere is given by:r = D2.
Learn more on proportionality here:
brainly.in/question/7910083
#SPJ11