Answer:
Benito Mussolini
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
question what was the policy of containment forged by american diplomat george f. kennan? responses firmly opposing soviet expansion and keeping communism in check firmly opposing soviet expansion and keeping communism in check keeping japan from forming alliances with korea and china keeping japan from forming alliances with korea and china a system of troop deployment that surrounded the soviet union a system of troop deployment that surrounded the soviet union a plan to prevent eastern european nations from becoming economically independent
The policy of containment, forged by American diplomat George F. Kennan, involved firmly opposing Soviet expansion and keeping communism in check. So the answer is : involved firmly opposing Soviet expansion and keeping communism in check.
The policy of containment was forged by American diplomat George F. Kennan. It involved firmly opposing Soviet expansion and keeping communism in check. It was not related to keeping Japan from forming alliances with Korea and China or deploying troops around the Soviet Union or preventing Eastern European nations from becoming economically independent.
The policy of containment was a strategy that aimed to prevent the spread of communism outside of the Soviet Union. It was based on the belief that communism was a threat to democracy and that if the Soviet Union was allowed to expand its influence, it would eventually threaten the security of the United States and its allies.
Kennan's policy of containment was first put into practice in the late 1940s and continued to guide American foreign policy throughout the Cold War. Therefore the answer is : involved firmly opposing Soviet expansion and keeping communism in check.
For more questions on: diplomat
https://brainly.com/question/3106644
#SPJ11
Which union was most successful in getting better pay and shorter hours for its skilled members?
A. National Labor Union
B. American Federation of Labor
C. Knights of Labor
D. American Railway Union
Answer:
The correct answer is B. American Federation of Labor (AFL).
Explanation:
The National Labor Union (NLU) was one of the earliest labor federations in the United States, founded in 1866. While the NLU was able to secure some victories for its members, it was short-lived and ultimately dissolved in 1873.
The Knights of Labor (KOL) was a later labor organization founded in 1869. The KOL was more radical in its approach than the NLU, advocating for the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of worker cooperatives. While the KOL was able to gain a large following at its peak, it ultimately declined due to internal divisions and the organization's involvement in the failed Haymarket Riot of 1886.
The American Railway Union (ARU) was founded in 1893 and was led by Eugene V. Debs. The ARU achieved some notable successes in its early years, including a successful strike against the Great Northern Railway in 1894. However, the organization's involvement in the Pullman Strike of 1894 led to its downfall, as the federal government intervened and sent troops to break the strike.
The American Federation of Labor (AFL) was founded in 1886 and was led by Samuel Gompers. The AFL focused on organizing skilled workers into trade unions and advocated for better pay and working conditions for its members. The AFL was able to secure significant victories for its members, including the eight-hour workday and collective bargaining rights.
Therefore, the most successful union in getting better pay and shorter hours for its skilled members was the American Federation of Labor (AFL).
What does Justice Harlan believe will come from this ruling
Zahi introduces himself in an online message board. "Hi! I’m Zahi, and I’m a boy in the eighth grade. I’ve lived in Atlanta my whole life, and my parents moved here from Somalia. I wanted to join this group to talk to other kids who play sports using wheelchairs.”
Which concept applies to Zahi’s description of himself?
intersectionality
media literacy
discrimination
economic class
Answer:
its intersectionality
Explanation:
What two branches of Georgia's govemment are involved in the appointment or Justices to the
state Supreme Court?
a) Briefly describe one major difference between Leuchtenburg’s and Biles’ historical interpretations of the New Deal.
b) Briefly explain how one specific historical event, development, or circumstance from 1932 to 1940 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Leuchtenburg’s argument.
c) Briefly explain how one specific historical event, development, or circumstance from 1932 to 1940 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Biles’ argument.
(excerpt is below)
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
“In eight years, [Franklin] Roosevelt and the New Dealers had almost revolutionized the agenda of American politics. . . . Franklin Roosevelt re-created the modern Presidency. . . . The White House became the focus of all government—the fountainhead of ideas, the initiator of action, the representative of the national interest. . . . For the first time for many Americans, the federal government became an institution that was directly experienced. More than state and local governments, it became the government, an agency directly concerned with their welfare.”
William E. Leuchtenburg, historian, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940, published in 1963
“For all the alterations in politics, government, and the economy, the New Deal fell far short of a revolution. The two-party system survived intact, and neither fascism . . . nor communism attracted much of a following in the United States. . . . The economy remained capitalistic; free enterprise and private ownership, not socialism, emerged from the 1930s. . . . Roosevelt . . . advocated measured change to offset drastic alterations. . . . The New Deal’s great achievement was the application of just enough change to preserve the American political economy.”
Roger Biles, historian, A New Deal for the American People, 1991
Main difference is Leuchtenburg argues that the New Deal was a revolutionary change that revolutionized the agenda of American politics,
Biles, on the other hand, argues that the New Deal was a gradual change that preserved the political economy of the United States.
B) The passage of the Emergency Banking Act in 1933 is one specific historical event that could be used to support Leuchtenburg's argument. President Roosevelt was able to declare a national bank holiday and issue federal guarantees for bank deposits thanks to this piece of legislation. This was a critical improvement that assisted with balancing out the financial framework and reestablish trust in the economy. Additionally, it demonstrated the government's willingness to act boldly in response to the economic crisis. Leuchtenburg argument that the New Deal marked a significant shift in the role of the federal government and its willingness to intervene in economic affairs could be supported by this event.
C) One verifiable occasion, improvement, or situation from 1932 to 1940 that could be utilized to help Biles' contention is the entry of the Public Modern Recuperation Act (NIRA). The NIRA was an endeavor to manage industry and work relations, yet it was ultimately controlled illegal. This supports Biles' claim that the New Deal was a measured change rather than a revolutionary one because it demonstrates that Roosevelt was attempting to implement measured change rather than drastic changes.
What was the New Deal about?During the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt initiated a series of initiatives and programs known as the New Deal with the intention of restoring prosperity to the United States. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he acted quickly to stabilize the economy, offer jobs to those in need, and provide relief to those in need.
Learn more about New deal :
brainly.com/question/936437
#SPJ1
I NEED help fast
In what way were women taxed without representation?
D. They were unable to have jobs
C. They were not paid equally
B. They were denied citizenship
A. They were denied suffrage
Answer: A.
Explanation:
A is literally the answer, there are a few sources to back that claim up but there are none for the others.
10) Why did the North win the Civil War?
Answer:
The main reasons for the Union's victory were its superior resources (including manpower), transportation, and industrial capacity, as well as the effective leadership of President Abraham Lincoln and the military strategies of General Ulysses S. Grant.
Answer:
The American Civil War was a complex and multifaceted conflict with a range of factors that contributed to its outcome. However, there are several key reasons why the North was ultimately able to emerge victorious:
Superior Resources: The North had a significant advantage in terms of resources, including a larger population, more significant industrial capacity, and greater access to financial resources.
Stronger Military Leadership: The North had more experienced and capable military leaders, such as Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman, who were able to develop effective strategies and tactics to defeat the Confederacy.
Naval Power: The Union's control of the seas and its ability to blockade Southern ports severely limited the Confederacy's ability to import essential supplies and export cotton, which was a significant source of revenue for the South.
International Relations: The North's diplomatic efforts were more successful than the South's in securing international support, particularly from Britain and France, which ultimately helped to prevent foreign intervention in the war.
Ideological Unity: The North was fighting to preserve the Union and end slavery, which gave them a sense of purpose and unity, while the Confederacy was fighting to preserve slavery, which made it difficult to maintain support from some factions.
Overall, the combination of these factors gave the North a significant advantage over the Confederacy and ultimately allowed them to emerge victorious in the Civil War
what was the significance of the 1884 berlin conference? a. european countries subdivided africa for colonial rule. b. european countries established a timeline for granting independence to african colonies. c. germany signed a treaty ending the franco-prussian war. d. england and germany allied to usurp african territory that was held by france and the netherlands. please select the best answer from the choices provided. a b c d mark this and return'
Answer:
European countries subdivided Africa for colonial rule
Explanation:
european countries subdivided Africa for colonial rule
The significance of the 1884 Berlin Conference was that European countries subdivided Africa for colonial rule. So, the best answer from the choices provided is option A. The conference aimed to regulate the colonization and trade in Africa, leading to the partition of the continent among various European powers.
The significance of the 1884 Berlin Conference was that European countries subdivided Africa for colonial rule.What was the significance of the 1884 Berlin Conference?The significance of the 1884 Berlin Conference was that European countries subdivided Africa for colonial rule. The Berlin Conference marked the beginning of the “Scramble for Africa” when Europeans had divided up the African continent among themselves.
The Berlin Conference of 1884–85 regulated European colonization and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism time period. At the conference, representatives of the European powers drew up regulations for the African continent, dividing it into spheres of influence, and guided European colonization and trade in Africa in the late nineteenth century.
To know more about Berlin Conference refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/1913699#
#SPJ11
How did France's contributions help the Americans in the War of Independence?
France played a significant role in helping the Americans during the War of Independence. Here are some of the ways in which France's contributions were important:Military aid: France provided military aid to the American colonists, including troops, equipment, and ships. French soldiers fought alongside the Americans in several key battles, such as the Battle of Yorktown, which helped secure victory for the Americans.Financial aid: France also provided significant financial aid to the Americans, including loans and grants. This support was critical to helping the colonists pay for supplies, equipment, and other expenses associated with the war.Diplomatic support: France's decision to support the American colonists also had a significant impact on the war politically. France recognized the independence of the American colonies and worked to secure international support for their cause. This helped to isolate Britain diplomatically and weakened its ability to continue the war.Inspiration and morale boost: France's support for the American colonists was seen as a powerful symbol of hope and inspiration. It helped to boost morale among the colonists and reinforced their commitment to the cause of independence.Overall, France's contributions were critical to the success of the American colonists in the War of Independence. Without France's military, financial, and diplomatic support, it is likely that the war would have been much more difficult for the Americans to win.
The New Deal focused on relief, recovery, and reform.
Which best describes recovery?
O maintaining traditional economic policies, such as imposing high tariffs on imports
O ensuring that jobless people had life's basic necessities
O creating new laws to restructure banks, change labor relations, and construct new social programs
O planning to get the economy moving again and put people back to work
Answer:
Planning to get the economy moving again and put people back to work
What was the significance of the decision of the Supreme Court in regents of the university of California v Bakke 1978
Answer:
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) was significant because it addressed the use of affirmative action in college admissions. The case centered around the University of California, Davis, which had set aside 16 seats in each entering medical school class for minority applicants. Bakke, a white male, was denied admission to the medical school twice despite having higher test scores and grades than many of the admitted minority candidates.
The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional, but upheld the use of affirmative action in certain circumstances. The court held that race could be used as one factor among many in the admissions process to achieve diversity, but that strict racial quotas were not permissible. The decision was significant because it established the principle that race could be considered in college admissions as one factor among many, but that quotas could not be used to give an unfair advantage to minority candidates. It also highlighted the tensions and debates surrounding affirmative action and equal protection under the law.
In 1970 a federal court ruled that the use of "In God We Trust" on money was constitutional. The judges determined that the
national motto should be understood as
Answer:
In 1970 a federal court ruled that the use of "In God We Trust" on money was constitutional. The judges determined that the national motto should be understood as a patriotic and ceremonial phrase that reflects the historical and contemporary significance of religion in the United States. The court also noted that the phrase does not force anyone to participate in a religious activity or belief, and that it does not establish a state religion or interfere with individual rights. Therefore, the use of "In God We Trust" on money is considered constitutional as a form of national expression and tradition.
100 POINTS
Match the vocabulary word with its meaning.
1 .
a group made up of sovereign states that remain associated with Great Britain
desertification
2 .
the transformation of land from green to desert
ecosystem
3 .
the plants and wildlife that make up a region
finite
4 .
having an end; opposite of infinite
invasive
5 .
advantageous or favorable toward something
Commonwealth
6 .
plants or animals introduced to an area that destroy or hinder indigenous species
conducive
Answer:
1. Commonwealth
2. Desertification
3. Ecosystem
4. Finite
5. Conducive
6. Invasive
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Please explain why monopolization was such a central part of the economic landscape of the Second Industrial Revolution while not at all a part of the First.
Monopolization was a central part of the Second Industrial Revolution but not the First.
Why it is?
Technological advances during the Second Industrial Revolution allowed for larger corporations to dominate entire industries, creating barriers to entry for new firms. The economic and legal environment during this period encouraged monopolization, with laissez-faire economic policies and courts often favoring businesses.
In contrast, the First Industrial Revolution was focused on mechanization and efficiency, and the economic and legal environment was not as favorable for monopolies to emerge. These factors contributed to the emergence of monopolies during the Second Industrial Revolution and their absence during the First.
To know more about Industrial Revolution related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/455063
#SPJ1
REPORT: RECONSTRUCTION AND ITS EFFECTS
Here is your goal for this assignment:
Write a report analyzing the effects of Reconstruction on the political, social, and economic life of the nation
Imagine that you are a northern Congressional representative who has gone South after the war to analyze the effects of Reconstruction. You are to write a report that analyzes the effects of the Civil War and Reconstruction on the political, economic, and social life of the nation.
As you research the effects, you may want to think about the following in the preparation of your report:
1. Economic difficulties faced by the United States during Reconstruction. Note the difficulties of the South in comparison to the North.
2. Social problems that faced the South during Reconstruction and the impact on various groups. Note issues like former slaves, the enfranchisement of Confederates, the federal occupation, and the need to adopt new state constitutions.
3. Political problems resulting from Radical Reconstruction replaced some white Southerners in politics with Northerners and blacks; this sparked controversy and resistance among many white Southerners.
Your report to Congress is to be typed using proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your report should be 500 words in length and list your sources of information at the end of your report.
Here the report consists of introduction, social and political problems and also the conclusion for the given question.
Introduction:
I travelled to the South after the Civil War as a Northern Congressional representative to study the effects of Reconstruction on the nation's political, social, and economic life. Reconstruction was a pivotal period in American history, marked by political, economic, and social challenges, particularly in the South. The goal of this report is to look into how Reconstruction affected these three aspects of American life and the civil war.
Economic Difficulties:
During Reconstruction, the United States faced significant economic challenges, particularly in the South. Much of the Southern economy had been destroyed by the war. The abolition of slavery had a significant impact on the Southern economy, as plantation owners struggled to find new labor. Sharecropping emerged as an alternative to slavery, but it trapped many African Americans in a cycle of debt and poverty. The North experienced economic growth during this period, with industries expanding and railroads being built.
Social Issues:
Reconstruction caused social problems, particularly in the South. Former slaves faced discrimination and violence despite the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. Many white Southerners were resistant to change, and the enfranchisement of Confederates, as well as the need to adopt new state constitutions, exacerbated tensions. The federal occupation of the South heightened social unrest, with many white Southerners believing they had lost their independence.
Political Issues:
Under Radical Reconstruction, some white Southerners were replaced in politics by Northerners and blacks. While this was an important step towards greater political equality, it sparked debate and opposition among many white Southerners. The establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau and the passage of civil rights legislation were intended to protect the rights of African Americans, but they were met with opposition and violence from white Southerners, particularly the Ku Klux Klan.
Conclusion:
Reconstruction was a difficult period for the United States, particularly in the South. The challenges that the country faced during this time period had an impact on its political, economic, and social life. While the abolition of slavery was a significant step towards greater freedom and equality, it also introduced new challenges, such as economic hardship and social tensions. The political changes of Radical Reconstruction aimed to promote greater equality, but they were met with opposition and violence. Reconstruction paved the way for the twentieth-century Civil Rights Movement, which sought to address the lingering effects of slavery and discrimination.
Hence here is the detailed report of the given question.
Learn more about Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/30914278
#SPJ1
Imagine an archaeologist from the year 2350 who's just excavated the very house or apartment you student of 2023, live in today. What might this archaeologist conclude about our civilization?
To understand how people lived in certain eras and locations, archaeologists study artefacts and characteristics. They are interested in the day-to-day activities of these people, their political system, social interactions, and core values.
Who are archaeologists?
The use of radiocarbon dating by archaeologists is essential. It operates under the premise that carbon exists in two distinct isotopes or forms. All living things take up the atmospheric carbon 14 that is created. As an animal or plant dies, the carbon 14 starts to decompose at a certain rate.
Archaeologists identify, recover, and document cultural and biological remnants discovered in the earth through the process of archaeological excavation. House foundations, burials, artefacts, bones, seeds, and many more remnants of past activity are evidence of human experience.
The ruins of a building, a burial, or a pot might all be discovered by an archaeologist. Each finding is similar to a puzzle piece. In order to build a picture of life in the distant past, the archaeologist tries to link these disparate parts together. Artifacts are things that were created and utilized by people in the past, such as pottery and tools.
Learn more about archaeologists:
https://brainly.com/question/28209452
#SPJ1
Which statements describe a result of Gitlow v. New York? Check all that apply.
• Through incorporation, the First Amendment applied to state law.
• Constitutional amendments cannot be incorporated as needed.
• The Fourteenth Amendment made the Constitution superior to state law.
• The states are not responsible for following the Bill of Rights.
• The due process clause can be used to incorporate the Bill of Rights.
In Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), the Supreme Court voted 7-2 to uphold the constitutionality of New York's Criminal Anarchy Statute of 1902, which prohibited advocating violent overthrow of the government.
How did the case of Gitlow v. New York use the 1st and 14th Amendments?New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), used to be a landmark choice of the United States Supreme Court keeping that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had prolonged the First Amendment's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to follow to the governments of U.S. states.
What amendment was used in Gitlow v. New York?Gitlow v. New York—decided in 1925—was the first Supreme Court choice applying the First Amendment's free speech protections to abuses by way of kingdom governments.
Learn more about Gitlow v. here;
https://brainly.com/question/1360999
#SPJ9
Answer:
Explanation:
A,C,E
The colonists believe “No British colonies can be taxed without…”?
Answer:
No taxation without representation
Explanation:
1. How would you describe the attitude of the narrator toward elite New York society?
-
2. Why do you think Wharton uses words such as ¨pressed,¨ ¨expected,¨ ¨obliged,¨ ¨forced,¨ and ¨plunged¨?
-
3. How does the young girl described in the excerpt contrast with those around her?
-
4. How does the author foreshadow that problems will arise for the young girl depicted in the excerpt? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
-
5. Why do you think Wharton´s novel reflected overall trends in society?
"The Age of Innocence" portrays New York's elite society as shallow, hypocritical, and obsessed with maintaining social norms.
How is the atmosphere described?The suffocating atmosphere constrains characters and reflects broader social and cultural shifts of the late 19th century, such as industrialization and social reform.
May Welland, the young girl, represents innocence and purity in contrast to corrupting influences.
Her engagement to Newland Archer is uncertain, foreshadowing problems.
The novel highlights the growing divide between the established elite and the upwardly mobile middle class.
Read more about narration here:
https://brainly.com/question/27764691
#SPJ1
How can an identified civic, political, economic, social, and/or constitutional issue can be “muckraked” in our society via photography, novels, or journalism?
Muckraking or muckraked is the practice of exposing and publicizing the corruption or other unethical behavior of individuals or institutions, typically via the media.
Here are some ways an identified issue can be muckraked through photography, novels, or journalism:
Photography: Photography can be a powerful tool to expose social or political issues. Photographers can capture images of poverty, injustice, environmental degradation, or other issues and use them to raise awareness and advocate for change.
Novels: Fiction can be a powerful way to explore social, political, and economic issues. Novels can use storytelling to raise awareness and empathy for people affected by social injustices.
Journalism: Journalism is a key way to expose political and economic corruption, social injustices, and constitutional issues. Investigative reporting can reveal the actions of politicians, corporations, and other institutions that may be harmful or unethical. Journalists can also use their platforms to advocate for policy changes or to amplify the voices of marginalized communities.
Learn more about poverty here:
https://brainly.com/question/10645433
#SPJ1
Who was Christopher Columbus working for when he sailed West from Europe?
which group was not a strong supporter of the whigs? multiple choice question. small farmers in the west who had migrated from the south wealthy southern plante
Small farmers in West who had migrated from the South was not strong supporter of the Whigs.
What is migration?Migration is process of moving from one place to the another, either permanently or temporarily. It can be voluntary or forced and can occur due to various reasons such as economic, social, political or environmental factors. Migration can be within a country or across international borders. People migrate for various reasons, including seeking better job opportunities, education, better living standards, or to escape persecution, war, or natural disasters. Migration can have both positive and negative impacts on individuals, communities, and countries, including cultural exchange, economic growth, demographic changes, and social tensions. It is a complex issue that requires a nuanced understanding of its causes and effects to effectively address its challenges and harness its potential benefits.
To learn more about migration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29585183
#SPJ1
What does being an American feel like to you.
Which phrase would best describe Manifest Destiny?
Answer:
a belief in the inherent superiority of white Americans, as well as the conviction that they were destined by God to conquer the territories of North America, from sea to shining sea.
In 1854 in London, there was an outbreak of cholera. This disease spread from the Broad Street pump and killed about 500 people in 10 days. John Snow proved his theory that what thing caused the outbreak and spread of cholera?
Answer:
Explanation:
In 1854, a cholera epidemic broke out, affecting resident families of tailors and clerks from the shops of nearby Regent Street. The epidemic caused violent diarrhea and very high mortality, with some 600 deaths in one week during September 18541. What do you think the author means by ¨the badge of color¨?
-
2. Why would references to race increase prejudice?
-
3. Based on the article, how did reporters use ¨malice aforethought¨?
-
4. What policy did two of the great dailies of the time adopt?
-
5. How does this article relate to recent events?
The author's use of "badge of color" most likely refers to how a person's skin color is seen as a symbol of their racial identity and can be subject to discrimination or prejudice.
What does this mean?References to race can increase prejudice by reinforcing stereotypes and biases about certain racial groups, leading to assumptions or judgments based solely on ethnicity.
The article suggests that reporters deliberately portrayed African Americans in a negative light to appeal to racist attitudes and increase circulation.
Two major dailies adopted a policy of objective reporting, avoiding racial stereotypes or inflammatory language. The article highlights the persistence of racial prejudice and discrimination in society, emphasizing the importance of responsible journalism in promoting understanding and tolerance, and avoiding the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and biases.
Read more about discrimination here:
https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
Why were so many European immigrants attracted to the middle colonies?
A. Because they wanted to farm the fertile soil
B. Because they were skilled sailors
C. Because they planned to work in the timber industry
B . Because they wanted to become whalers
Answer:
The answer to the question is A. Because they wanted to farm the fertile soil.
Explanation:
learning curve why did the whigs invite women to participate in the presidential campaign of 1840?
The Whig Party invited women to participate in the presidential campaign of 1840 because they wanted to broaden their support base and gain more votes.
Women were an important demographic to target because they made up a significant portion of the electorate. By inviting women to participate, the Whigs hoped to increase their chances of winning the election.The Whig Party was founded in 1834 as a political party in the United States. They were the main opposition party to the Democratic Party, which was in power at the time.
The Whigs believed in a strong federal government and supported protective tariffs and internal improvements. In the presidential election of 1840, they nominated William Henry Harrison as their candidate for president.The Whigs recognized the importance of women in the election and invited them to participate in various ways. They organized rallies and events specifically for women and published articles in women's magazines to promote their candidate.
The Whigs also appealed to women's sense of patriotism and encouraged them to get involved in the campaign. The Whigs' strategy paid off, and they won the election of 1840. While it is unclear how much of a role women played in their victory, it is clear that their efforts to reach out to women were successful. The Whigs' decision to invite women to participate in the presidential campaign of 1840 was an important moment in American history, as it helped to pave the way for women's suffrage and increased political participation in the years to come.
For more about presidential campaign:
https://brainly.com/question/29889756
#SPJ11
which of the following is not true about the ghost dance songs? group of answer choices they are from a native american religion of the late 19th century. they ended with the massacre at the battle of wounded knee. they are sung in a call and response style. they feature short, paired phrases.
The following isn't accurate about the ghost dance songs they are Native American rain dances. option (E) is correct.
The Ghost Dance included aggregate singing and moving without instrumental backup; the tunes followed the overall melodic style related to the area, utilizing matched express design, moderate rhythms, restricted melodic ranges, and mixed harmony.
The Ghost Dance of 1870 and 1890 was a Local American world-recharging religion. The religion took many structures, yet its important thoughts were that the spirits of the dead would be raised, the bison would return, and European pioneers would be driven away.
Therefore, option (E) is correct.
Learn more about Native American:
https://brainly.com/question/6992107
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
which of the following is not true about the ghost dance songs? group of answer choices
(A) they are from a native American religion of the late 19th century.
(B) they ended with the massacre at the battle of wounded knee.
(C) they are sung in a call and response style.
(D) they feature short, paired phrases.
(E) They are Native American rain dances.