Which theory most added the concept of motivation to the criminological repertoire

According to the relative deprivation theory, hyper-commercialism relates to an increase in comparative reference groups.

According to the definition of relative deprivation psychology, someone will feel deprived or entitled to something if they are compared to someone else. The foundation of the relative deprivation theory is the idea that people frequently feel as though they fall short of a benchmark.

Those who are content with their current situation are less likely to seek social change, claims the relative deprivation theory. According to this view, social movements develop as a result of people feeling mistreated.

To know more about relative deprivation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/26869272

#SPJ1

Answer:

Sid committed the tort of negligence by failing to obey a traffic signal and causing harm to Jane while she was lawfully crossing the street.

Sid committed the tort of negligence by failing to observe a stop sign and hitting Jane who was legally crossing the street at the time.

Negligence is a type of tort in which a person's failure to exercise reasonable care causes harm to another person. In this case, Sid had a duty to obey traffic laws and exercise reasonable care while driving his automobile.

By failing to observe the stop sign, he breached this duty and caused harm to Jane who was legally crossing the street. To prove negligence, Jane must show that Sid owed her a duty of care, he breached that duty, and his breach caused her harm. Since Sid failed to observe a stop sign and hit Jane, he is liable for the harm caused to her.

As a result, Jane may be entitled to compensation for her injuries and other damages caused by Sid's negligence.

To know more about tort of negligence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13449948#

#SPJ11

Answer: An entry in the Identity Theft File must be supported by an official complaint recorded by a law enforcement agency. Officers may complete a CAD report and attach the consent form for those cases without suspect information.

Explanation: Report Identity Theft. Report identity (ID) theft to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) online at IdentityTheft.gov or by phone at 1-877-438-4338. The FTC will collect the details of your situation.

Identity theft occurs when someone uses the personal or financial information of another person, typically for financial gain.

When an imposter obtains crucial pieces of personally identifiable information (PII), such as Social Security or driver's license numbers, in order to assume the identity of another individual, this is a crime known as identity theft, which is also known as identity fraud.

This suggests that a con artist might get sensitive data like names, birthdates, Social Security numbers, driver's license information, addresses, and account numbers for credit cards or bank accounts.

Any crime in which a person wrongfully obtains and uses the personal information of another person in a fraudulent or deceptive manner, typically for financial gain, is referred to as "identity theft" or "identity fraud."

To learn more about fraud visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30715266

#SPJ1

The regular hours worked last week were 40, and the overtime hours worked were 11. The gross pay for the week was $465.72.

To determine the regular and overtime hours, we need to know the weekly threshold for overtime pay. In the United States, the threshold is 40 hours per week. Any hours worked above 40 are considered overtime hours.

In this case, the employee worked a total of 51 hours in a week, which means that they worked 40 regular hours and 11 overtime hours.

To calculate the gross pay, we need to determine the regular pay and overtime pay separately, and then add them together.

Regular pay:

40 regular hours x $8.45/hour = $338

Overtime pay:

11 overtime hours x $8.45/hour x 1.5 (overtime rate) = $127.72

Gross pay:

$338 (regular pay) + $127.72 (overtime pay) = $465.72

Know more about gross pay here:

https://brainly.com/question/13143081

#SPJ1

A. The psychological theory of crime is the one that has most significantly expanded the criminological vocabulary by introducing the idea of motive.

According to psychological theories of crime, individual variations in thought processes are what lead to criminal behaviour. Thoughts and feelings are regarded to be the driving forces behind a person's behaviours, according to a variety of psychological theories.

Based on the research of Sigmund Freud, some of the first psychological theories of crime were developed (1856–1939). According to Freud, the "id," a vast reservoir of primal urges that require satisfaction, exists in all human beings.

To know more about crime visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/27187116

#SPJ1

A contract that violates state or federal statutory law is illegal and unenforceable. So, the correct answer is option c. illegal and unenforceable.

A contract is a written or spoken agreement that is legally binding between two or more parties. When entering into a contract, there are a variety of considerations to consider, including who is obligated to what, who is liable for what, and what happens if the contract is broken or breached.

When a contract violates the law, it is considered void and cannot be legally enforced by either party. Thus, the correct answer is "c. illegal and unenforceable.". In any country, a contract must be legal and enforceable.

When one party violates the agreement, the other party has the legal right to seek a remedy. If the contract is illegal, it is unenforceable in court, and neither party can seek a remedy.

To know more about contract , refer here

https://brainly.com/question/27516414#

#SPJ11

The core assumption or presupposition of utilitarianism is A. social contract

The core assumption or presupposition of utilitarianism is that the moral value of an action should be judged based on its ability to maximize overall happiness or pleasure and minimize overall suffering or pain for the greatest number of people affected by the action.

This is often referred to as the principle of utility, which is the foundation of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory, which means that it judges the morality of actions based on their consequences.

Learn more about utilitarianism at https://brainly.com/question/14453548

#SPJ1

The bike ramp installation may use the defense that Kirby assumed the risk of harm by signing the written agreement indicating that she was aware of the possibility of harm in using the bike ramps.

The defense may also argue that Kirby voluntarily accepted the risk of harm by using the bike ramps despite being aware of the risk. Additionally, the defense may argue that the bike ramp installation took reasonable steps to minimize the risk of harm by providing safety equipment and warning signs.

Finally, the defense may argue that the bike ramp installation did not act negligently, and that Kirby's injury was a result of her own actions. The bike ramp installation could use the defense of assumption of risk. This means that they could argue that Kirby assumed the risk of injury by signing the agreement that indicated that she knew there was a possibility of harm in using the bike ramps.

To know more about defense, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31212398

#SPJ4

Answer:William the Conqueror's 1066 invasion of England furthered the concept of law in ways still practiced today by introducing the Norman legal system to England[1][2][3]. This system was based on the idea of a centralized monarchy and a strong, uniform legal code, which helped to establish the rule of law and reduce the power of local lords[1][2]. The Norman legal system also introduced the concept of trial by jury, which is still used in many countries today[1][3]. Additionally, the invasion led to the compilation of the Domesday Book, a comprehensive survey of land ownership and taxation that helped to establish a more efficient and equitable system of taxation[1][3].

Answer:

Explanation:

A

Answer:

Explanation:

Statutory law and constitutional law are both important sources of law, but they have different origins, purposes, and scopes. Here are the main differences between the two:

1. Statutory law is created by legislative bodies, such as Congress or state legislatures, and is written down in statutes or codes. Constitutional law, on the other hand, derives from the Constitution and other founding documents, such as the Bill of Rights.

2. Statutory law is designed to regulate specific activities or conduct within society, such as traffic laws, criminal laws, or environmental regulations. Constitutional law, in contrast, is focused on the fundamental principles and structures of government, such as the separation of powers, individual rights, and federalism.

3.  Statutory law has a narrower scope than constitutional law, as it only applies to the specific subject matter it regulates. Constitutional law, in contrast, applies to the entire system of government and has broad implications for individual rights and liberties.

4. Statutory law can be easily amended or repealed by the legislative body that created it, whereas constitutional law is much more difficult to change, as it requires the approval of a supermajority of lawmakers or a constitutional convention.

5. Statutory law is generally interpreted by the courts to determine its meaning and scope, but constitutional law is often interpreted by the Supreme Court or other high courts to establish its meaning and application.

In summary, statutory law and constitutional law serve different purposes and have different origins, scopes, amendment processes, and methods of interpretation. While statutory law regulates specific activities and conduct within society, constitutional law provides the foundational principles and structures of government and protects individual rights and liberties.

B. Psychopathology is the specialised study of mental illnesses, whereas pathology is the study of sickness or abnormal situations.

Description: Deviant, dysfunctional, or otherwise abnormal behaviour and thinking processes are collectively referred to as psychopathology. When broken down, "pathology" refers to deviation, while "psycho" denotes mental or emotional states. When used collectively, the term "psychopathology" designates abnormal mental condition.

Psychopathology, often known as abnormal psychology, is the study of mental illnesses and peculiar or uncharacteristic behaviour. Professionals in psychiatry, psychology, and social work who interact with mental health patients must have a fundamental grasp of how mental diseases develop.

To know more about Psychopathology visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/6820190

#SPJ1

The criminologist who said that "discontent where there is no political solution leads to crime" was Stuart Hall.

A criminologist is a social scientist who studies crime, criminal behavior, and the criminal justice system. They analyze various aspects of crime, including its causes, patterns, and effects, as well as the response to crime by law enforcement and the criminal justice system.

Criminologists may conduct research to identify and understand the factors that contribute to criminal behavior, such as social, economic, and psychological factors, and develop strategies to prevent and reduce crime.

Learn  more about criminologist at:

https://brainly.com/question/28996894

#SPJ1

Media organisations shape public opinion, while political leaders use media to spread their messages and sway the public, making the link between media and politics complex and diverse.

The media serves as a conduit between the public and the government. Political communication is the relationship between citizens and politics, as well as the channels via which these two groups communicate with one another. If the relationship is established using the Pathos, Ethos, or Logos techniques of persuasion.

Social media has the ability to alter not just the message but also the dynamics, and the internet has established avenues of contact that are essential to the dissemination of news.

To know more about politics visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28348504

#SPJ9

According to the information the vocabulary is related with each meaning.

Here are the explanations for each vocabulary word in relation to the given descriptions:

In conclusion, forensic science often relies on the interpretation of bloodstain patterns to help reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to a crime. Understanding the different types of bloodstain patterns and what causes them is crucial in order to accurately analyze and interpret the evidence.

Learn more about forensic science in: https://brainly.com/question/29773304

#SPJ1

Option (B) Making it easier for voters to identify candidates who share their values.

The United States in 1800 became the first nation to develop nascent political parties organised on a national basis to accomplish the transfer of executive power from one faction to another via an election. The development and expansion of political parties that followed was closely linked to the broadening of voting rights. In the early days of the republic, only male property owners could vote, but that restriction began to erode in the early 19th century as the result of immigration, the growth of cities and other democratizing forces, such as the westward expansion of the country. Over the decades, the right to vote was extended to ever larger numbers of the adult population as restrictions based on property ownership, race and sex were eliminated. As the electorate expanded, the political parties evolved to mobilize the growing mass of voters as the means of political control. Political parties became institutionalized to accomplish this essential task. Thus, parties in America emerged as a part of democratic expansion, and, beginning in the 1830s, they became firmly established and powerful.

Please mark my answer as the BRAINLIEST.

Please don’t delete my answer , it is my real hard work and I did in by myself the whole answer.

State law specifying that public schools are not liable for the negligent acts of employees, such as coaches or athletic trainers, is an example of statutory immunity.

Statutory immunity is a legal concept that shields certain entities, such as government agencies or officials, from liability for certain actions or omissions. In this case, the state law provides public schools with immunity from liability for the negligent acts of their employees, specifically coaches or athletic trainers.

This means that if a student-athlete is injured due to the negligent actions of a coach or athletic trainer, the public school is not responsible for any damages that may result. Instead, the injured student-athlete would need to pursue legal action against the individual employee, who may or may not have insurance or assets to cover the damages.

Statutory immunity is intended to protect government entities from excessive liability and encourage them to continue providing important services without fear of being sued for every mistake or accident. However, it can also create situations where injured parties are unable to obtain compensation for their injuries.

To know more about statutory immunity, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14656630#

#SPJ11

When treating patients who are known or suspected to be contaminated with infections that are spread by respiratory droplets produced by a patient, use droplet precautions.

Posing open-ended inquiries. These inquiries provide the witness the opportunity to speak the majority of the interview and may help the witness feel more in control. not being interrupted. Interrupting the witness while they are giving their testimony prevents them from participating actively and messes with their memory.

Ask concise questions. Never pose a question when you don't know the answer since it could undermine your case rather than strengthen it. If a witness doesn't provide you with the response you were hoping for, do not Dispute with them or declare that they are lying.

To know more about victim safety visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/18024441

#SPJ1

False. If state laws designed to protect minors have stricter requirements than federal laws, the state laws prevail as long as they don't conflict with federal laws or the Constitution.

If state laws have more stringent standards than federal laws, the state laws will take precedence, as long as they do not contradict the Constitution or federal law.

This is because the United States Constitution grants states certain powers, including the authority to control things such as the health, safety, and well-being of their people. If local and federal laws clash, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution grants federal law priority.

Learn more about federal laws:

https://brainly.com/question/25912245

#SPJ4

The founding father of the USA who can be said to be the founder of American biological criminology is D. Benjamin Rush.

He was a physician and signer of the Declaration of Independence who believed that criminal behavior could be traced to physical abnormalities in the brain and body.

He argued that crime was not simply a moral failing, but rather a medical condition that required treatment. Rush's views on biological criminology were influential in shaping early debates about the causes of crime in America.

Answer:

Cultural stereotypes are generalizations or assumptions people make about individuals or groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or other cultural characteristics. These stereotypes can hurt decision-making in criminal justice settings, such as during police investigations, jury selection, and sentencing.

One of the ways that cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making is through racial profiling. Police officers may make assumptions about individuals based on their race or ethnicity, leading to unfair treatment, such as being stopped and searched without cause or being treated with more suspicion than other individuals.

Cultural stereotypes can also impact jury selection and the verdicts that are reached. Jurors may hold biases or assumptions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals. For example, a juror may assume that a defendant from a certain cultural background is likelier to commit a certain crime, even if there is no evidence to support this claim.

In addition, cultural stereotypes can impact sentencing decisions. Judges may have preconceived notions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to harsher or more lenient sentences. For example, a judge may believe that a defendant from a specific cultural background is more likely to be violent and, therefore may impose a harsher sentence than they would for someone from a different background who committed the same crime.

Cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making in criminal justice settings by leading to unfair treatment, wrongful convictions, and unequal sentencing. Criminal justice professionals need to be aware of these biases and work to mitigate their impact on decision-making. This can include education and training on cultural competence and efforts to increase diversity and representation within the criminal justice system.

Cultural stereotypes can have a detrimental impact on decision-making in criminal justice settings due to the biases they create. These stereotypes are preconceived notions or generalizations about individuals based on their race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other cultural factors.

When these stereotypes influence decision-making in the criminal justice system, several negative consequences can occur:

1. Racial Profiling: Cultural stereotypes can lead to racial profiling, where law enforcement officers or other criminal justice professionals target individuals from specific racial or ethnic backgrounds based on assumptions or biases. This can result in unwarranted stops, searches, arrests, and disproportionate scrutiny of certain groups, regardless of individual behavior or evidence.

2. Unfair Treatment: Stereotypes can affect how suspects, defendants, witnesses, and victims are treated throughout the criminal justice process. When decision-makers hold prejudiced views, they may unconsciously or consciously treat individuals differently, leading to unjust outcomes.

3. Bias in Charging and Sentencing: Stereotypes can impact charging decisions and sentencing recommendations. For example, a prosecutor may be more likely to pursue harsher charges against a person from a specific cultural background based on stereotypes, even if the evidence does not support it.

4. Jury Bias: Stereotypes can influence jurors' perceptions and judgments during trials, affecting the fairness of the jury's decision. Biases may affect the credibility and sympathy given to witnesses or defendants, potentially leading to biased verdicts.

5. Resource Allocation: Cultural stereotypes can also affect resource allocation within the criminal justice system. Certain communities may receive more scrutiny or resources based on stereotypes, while others may be overlooked or underserved.

6. Impact on Rehabilitation: Stereotypes can influence decisions regarding parole, probation, or diversion programs, potentially hindering the successful rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals back into society.

7. Public Perception: When cultural stereotypes influence decision-making, it can erode public trust in the criminal justice system. Communities that feel unfairly targeted or treated are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement or participate fully in the legal process.

Addressing and mitigating the influence of cultural stereotypes in criminal justice settings is crucial for ensuring fairness, equity, and justice. Training law enforcement officers, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other stakeholders in cultural competency and unconscious bias awareness can help reduce the impact of stereotypes on decision-making. Implementing policies and procedures that promote objectivity, transparency, and accountability can also contribute to more equitable outcomes in the criminal justice system.

To know more about Cultural stereotypes:

https://brainly.com/question/31064678

#SPJ2

1. Spatter: The patterns created when a bloody object comes in contact with another surface; also called contact patterns.

2. Passive: The type of blood stain created by the force of gravity which creates drops or blood pools.

3. Transfer: The bloodstains created by the application of force to the area where the blood originated.

4. Spines: The pointed edges of a stain that radiate out form the spatter; can help determine the direction from which the blood traveled.

5. Satellite: Small drops of blood that break off from the parent spatter when the blood droplet hits a surface.

A vocabulary word refers to any individual word in a language that a person knows and uses for communication. Vocabulary is an essential component of language acquisition and communication, as it enables individuals to express their ideas and thoughts more accurately and effectively.

Read more about vocabulary word

brainly.com/question/29218732

#SPJ1

Martin committed theft, Kamala stole the bicycle, David committed robbery and armed robbery, Rosie committed robbery and possibly armed robbery, and Rosie used force to take the fur coat.

Punishment for a crime can vary depending on the severity of the offense and the laws of the jurisdiction. Common types of punishment include imprisonment, fines, probation, community service, restitution, capital punishment, alternative sentencing, electronic monitoring, house arrest, or drug and alcohol treatment programs.

Depending on the state, different crimes may be punishable by the death penalty, but most frequently these crimes are treason, homicide, and some forms of terrorism.

Learn more about Criminal code here:

brainly.com/question/24706076

#SPJ1

2.1 - Civil case, the court with jurisdiction would depend on the location where the lawsuit was filed and the laws of that jurisdiction.

2.2 - Civil case, the court with jurisdiction would depend on the location where the divorce was filed and the laws of that jurisdiction.

2.3 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the assault occurred.

2.4 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the assault occurred.

2.5 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the child was taken.

The statement is true. The Volunteer Protection Act (VPA) of 1997 provides immunity from certain types of lawsuits to volunteers who work for nonprofit organizations or governmental entities, including volunteer coaches.

Specifically, the VPA protects volunteers from liability for harm caused by their acts or omissions that are the result of simple negligence while performing their duties as volunteers.

The VPA also provides immunity for harm caused by the volunteer's conduct that constitutes "willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence, reckless misconduct, or a conscious, flagrant indifference to the rights or safety of the individual harmed by the volunteer."

To know more about  volunteer coach here

https://brainly.com/question/24172436

#SPJ4

People can propose and enact state laws by gathering signatures on a petition through B. an initiative.

An initiative is a process in which a proposed law or constitutional amendment is put on the ballot and submitted directly to the voters for approval or rejection.

The process begins with the submission of a petition to the relevant government body, typically the state's secretary of state. The petition must contain a certain number of signatures from registered voters, as required by state law.

Once the petition is certified, the proposed law is placed on the ballot for the next general election or a special election called specifically for that purpose.

Find out more on initiatives at https://brainly.com/question/28969119

#SPJ1

Answer:

Iraqi forces invaded and annexed Kuwait and Saddam Hussein deposed the Emir of Kuwait, Jaber Al-Sabah, he installed Ali Hassan al-Majid as the new governor of Kuwait. The Iraqi invasion and occupation of Kuwait was unanimously condemned by all major world powers.

Answer:

Based on the information provided, it appears that Jim’s pamphlet may be considered an invitation to treat rather than a legally binding offer. An invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to negotiate and invites others to make an offer. In this case, Jim’s pamphlet could be seen as an invitation for customers to come to his shop and make an offer to purchase the railway sleepers at the special price.

In the case of Partridge v Crittenden [1968], it was held that advertisements are generally considered invitations to treat rather than offers. Similarly, in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953], it was held that displaying goods with a price tag in a self-service store is also considered an invitation to treat.

Therefore, Jim may not be legally bound to sell the railway sleepers at the lower price stated in the pamphlet. However, this is just general information and should not be taken as legal advice. It is recommended that Jim consults a lawyer for specific legal advice on this matter.

Explanation:

Answer:

The legal ethics surrounding the disclosure of information given to attorneys by their clients is a complex issue, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. However, in general, attorneys have a duty to maintain confidentiality and protect the interests of their clients. This means that they should not disclose information that their clients have provided to them, unless they have been given explicit permission to do so.

However, in situations where the information provided by the client involves the commission of a past unsolved crime, attorneys may face conflicting obligations. On the one hand, they have a duty to maintain confidentiality and protect the interests of their clients. On the other hand, they have a duty to uphold the law and protect public safety.

Ultimately, the decision to disclose information about a past unsolved crime should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all relevant legal and ethical considerations. Attorneys should consider the potential risks and benefits of disclosure, as well as the potential consequences for their clients, before making any decisions about whether to disclose such information.

Explanation:

Option B is the right answer where explaining the legal process for filing a lawsuit, would be considered providing legal information.

This is because it does not involve giving any personal opinions or advice on a specific situation, nor does it involve representing someone in court. It simply involves providing general information about the steps involved in filing a lawsuit. Explaining the legal process for filing a lawsuit would be considered providing legal information. This is because it provides factual information on the steps involved in filing a lawsuit, such as the necessary forms to complete, deadlines to meet, and court procedures to follow. It does not involve providing an opinion or advice on a specific legal matter, and does not offer representation in court proceedings.

Learn more about lawsuit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Which of the following options would be considered as providing legal information?

A) Giving a legal advice on a specific situation
B) Explaining the legal process for filing a lawsuit
C) Sharing personal opinions on a legal issue
D) Offering a legal representation in court proceedings.