Answer:
Roosevelt's policies had a significant impact on the country's economy in the long term. Here are some of the ways in which his policies influenced the economy:
1. Expansion of the federal government: Roosevelt's policies greatly expanded the role of the federal government in the economy. The New Deal created a range of federal agencies and programs aimed at providing relief, stimulating economic growth, and regulating business. Many of these agencies and programs still exist today, and they continue to play a significant role in the economy.
2. Increased government spending: In order to stimulate economic growth and provide relief to those affected by the Great Depression, Roosevelt implemented a range of programs that required significant government spending. This spending helped to create jobs and boost economic activity, and it also helped to establish the idea that the government could play a positive role in the economy.
3. Regulation of business: Roosevelt's policies also included a range of regulations aimed at preventing another economic crisis. These regulations included the establishment of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which helped to prevent fraud and protect investors, and the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial and investment banking.
4. Social safety net: Roosevelt's policies also helped to establish a social safety net for those who were most affected by the economic crisis. Programs such as Social Security and unemployment insurance helped to provide a safety net for those who were struggling, and they remain important parts of the social safety net today.
In the long term, these policies helped to stabilize the economy and prevent another economic crisis. They also helped to establish the idea that the government has a role to play in regulating the economy and providing relief to those who are struggling. While there is debate over the effectiveness of some of Roosevelt's policies, his legacy in shaping the role of government in the economy is still felt today.
What are 2 potential consequences/effects if the
erosion on LA's coast continues?
Answer:
It is further anticipated that by 2050, without appropriate response, coastal Louisiana will lose an additional 630,000 acres of coastal marshes, swamps, and islands. This coastal trend indicates loss of land and increased vulnerability to storms and other natural disasters.
Explanation:
Following the Mexican-American War, Mexico experienced what? A. a major increase in its territory B. rapid economic growth C. the start of an industrial revolution D. a period of political instability
Which document provided a model plan of government to other nations?
Answer:
The United States Constitution
Explanation:
The document that provided a model plan of government to other nations is the United States Constitution. The Constitution of the United States, ratified in 1788, established a framework for the federal government and outlined the powers and structure of its branches. It served as a model for many other countries around the world as they sought to establish or revise their own systems of government. The principles of the U.S. Constitution, such as separation of powers, checks and balances, and individual rights, have influenced the development of constitutional law and governance in numerous countries.
How long is the Edmentum end of semester test for world history
Answer: there is no set length it varies student school state blah blah blah etc
Explanation: YIPPPEE
The length of the Edmentum end-of-semester test for world history will vary depending on the course and student, but it typically takes students between 45 minutes and 2 hours to complete.
The test is divided into multiple sections, each of which covers a different topic or time period in world history. Some of the topics that may be covered on the test include:
The Rise and Fall of ancient civilizationsThe Middle AgesThe RenaissanceThe Age of ExplorationThe Industrial RevolutionThe 20th century
The test also includes questions that require students to apply their knowledge of world history to real-world scenarios. For example, students may be asked to explain the causes of a particular historical event or to identify the impact of a historical figure or movement.
The Edmentum end-of-semester test for world history is an important assessment that helps teachers measure students' understanding of world history. The test results can be used to identify areas where students need additional support and to plan future instruction.
Learn more about Edmentum end-of-semester, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28222882
#SPJ4
A high life expectancy and literacy rate are signs that a country’s economy is __________.
A.
developed
B.
developing
C.
underdeveloped
D.
undeveloped
Answer:
A. Developed
Explanation:
The answer "A. Developed" is the most appropriate because a high life expectancy and literacy rate are commonly associated with developed economies. Developed countries typically have well-established healthcare systems that contribute to longer life expectancies. Additionally, they prioritize education, resulting in higher literacy rates and a skilled workforce. These indicators reflect a higher level of economic and social development, aligning with the characteristics of developed nations.
Which best explains what Marx hoped to get across?
Workers are slaves and should be inspired to revolt.
Workers should unite in the communist movement.
Workers should scare rulers into giving up their wealth.
Workers must be asked to incite a revolution against the rich.
Which of the following was not a form of financing for the American Civil War?
A. Printing paper money called "graybacks".
B. Selling cotton-backed bonds in the financial centers of Europe
C. Borrowing from the citizens of the southern states
D. Borrowing from the Rothschild's Family
Answer:
C. Borrowing from the citizens of the southern states was not a significant form of financing for the American Civil War. The Confederacy primarily relied on other forms of financing, such as printing paper money (known as "graybacks"), selling cotton-backed bonds in Europe, and borrowing from foreign governments and banks. While some individual citizens may have lent money to the Confederacy, this was not a major source of funding for the war effort. The Union, on the other hand, primarily financed the war through increased taxes and the sale of government bonds to its own citizens.
Compare and contrast the Reconstruction plans of President Johnson and the Radical Republicans in Congress
President Johnson's plan focused on a more lenient and quick restoration of the Southern states, the Radical Republicans in Congress pursued a more ambitious agenda that sought to protect the rights of freed slaves and establish a more equitable society through legislation and military intervention.
President Johnson's Reconstruction plan, known as Presidential Reconstruction, aimed at quickly reintegrating the Southern states into the Union.
It granted amnesty to most former Confederates and allowed them to regain political power. Johnson's plan did not prioritize protecting the rights of freed slaves and did not provide sufficient measures to ensure their equality and participation in society.On the other hand, the Radical Republicans in Congress, led by figures like Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, advocated for a more aggressive and comprehensive approach known as Congressional Reconstruction.
They sought to establish a more egalitarian society by enacting laws to protect the rights of freed slaves and promote racial equality. They pushed for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to all individuals born in the United States, including former slaves.The Radical Republicans also implemented military occupation of the South, divided it into military districts, and required the states to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment as a condition for readmission to the Union.
This approach aimed to ensure the enforcement of civil rights and prevent former Confederates from regaining power and subverting the rights of African Americans.
Hence, The Reconstruction plans of President Johnson and the Radical Republicans in Congress differed in their approach towards restoring the Southern states and the rights of freed slaves.
For more questions on Radical Republicans
https://brainly.com/question/11297324
#SPJ8
Political Views of
Supported
• Higher pay for farmworkers
Opposed
OA. Malcolm X
OB. Rosa Parks
OC. Cesar Chavez
OD. Clyde Bellecourt
.
Exploitation of low-wage workers
Which civil rights leader's name best completes the title of this table?
The name of the civil rights leader that best completes the title of the graphic is option B. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Jr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a prominent figure in the American civil rights movement and advocated for nonviolent resistance as a means to achieve equality and justice.
King strongly believed in civil disobedience as a tool for challenging unjust laws and practices. He emphasized the importance of peaceful protests and demonstrations to bring attention to racial inequality and discrimination. Through his leadership, he promoted the principles of nonviolent resistance, inspired by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi.
Another aspect of King's political views was his commitment to desegregation. He fought against racial segregation in various aspects of American society, including schools, transportation, and public spaces. King believed in the inherent dignity and equality of all individuals, regardless of their race, and worked towards creating a more inclusive and integrated society.
On the opposing side, King strongly opposed expressions of violence as a means of achieving social and political change. He emphasized the power of love, understanding, and peaceful dialogue in resolving conflicts and advancing civil rights. King also criticized political compromises that perpetuated racial injustice, advocating for comprehensive and transformative change.
In contrast to racial separatism, King advocated for racial integration and unity. He believed in the importance of breaking down barriers between different racial groups and promoting equality and cooperation.
Overall, Martin Luther King, Jr.'s political views were rooted in nonviolent resistance, civil disobedience, desegregation, opposition to violence, rejection of political compromises, and a vision of racial unity and equality .The correct answer is b.
Know more about Martin Luther King, Jr. here:
https://brainly.com/question/30310059
#SPJ8
The complete question is :
Political Views of __?____
Supported:
*Civil disobedience
*Nonviolent resistance
*Desegregation
Opposed:
*Expressions of violence
*Political compromises
*Racial separatism
The name of which civil rights leader best completes the title of the graphic?
A. Booker T. Washington
B. Martin Luther King, Jr.
C. Stokely Carmichael
D. Malcolm X
The earliest civilizations developed in the mountains
This statement is false. Instead, the correct statement is "The earliest civilizations developed in fertile river valleys, not in the mountains."
The earliest civilizations did not develop in the mountains but rather in fertile river valleys. These river valleys provided the necessary resources for agricultural practices, such as fertile soil for farming and water for irrigation. The most well-known early civilizations, such as Mesopotamia in the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley, Egypt along the Nile River, the Indus Valley civilization in present-day Pakistan and India, and the ancient Chinese civilizations along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, all emerged in flat or low-lying areas with access to water sources. These civilizations flourished due to the favorable conditions for agriculture, trade, and the development of complex societies.In conclusion, it is important to recognize that the earliest civilizations emerged in fertile river valleys, where access to water and fertile soil provided the foundation for agricultural prosperity and the development of complex societies.
For more questions on earliest civilizations:
https://brainly.com/question/2203731
#SPJ8
In the 1800s, some politicians wanted Indigenous people to adopt White culture. This idea was called:___.
a. assimilation. b. settlement. c. removal. d. expansion.
In the 1800s, some politicians wanted Indigenous people to adopt White culture. This idea was called: a. assimilation.
In the 1800s, there was a prevailing ideology among some politicians and policymakers that advocated for Indigenous people to adopt White culture. This concept was known as assimilation. Assimilation aimed to eradicate Indigenous cultures, traditions, and languages, and replace them with European-American ways of life. The proponents of assimilation believed that it was necessary for Indigenous people to abandon their own cultural practices and adopt those of the dominant White society in order to integrate into mainstream American society.Assimilation policies often included efforts to forcibly assimilate Indigenous children through boarding schools, where they were separated from their families and communities, forbidden from speaking their native languages, and encouraged to adopt Western customs and values. These policies were driven by the belief that Indigenous cultures were inferior and needed to be eradicated for Indigenous people to be considered civilized.It is crucial to note that assimilation policies had devastating consequences for Indigenous communities, resulting in the loss of cultural identity, land, and autonomy. Assimilation disregarded the rich cultural diversity and unique ways of life that Indigenous peoples had developed over centuries. It was a manifestation of colonialism and ethnocentrism, perpetuating a harmful and oppressive approach toward Indigenous populations.It is essential to recognize and understand the historical context and impact of such policies in order to foster respect, appreciation, and support for Indigenous cultures and rights today.The correct option is: a. assimilation.
For more such questions on White culture
https://brainly.com/question/31370610
#SPJ8
The term for the 1800s idea of Indigenous people adopting White culture is assimilation. This was a wide-spread ideology enforced by politicians and authorities, often resulting in the loss of indigenous cultures and languages.
Explanation:In the 1800s, there was an ideology among some politicians that called for Indigenous people to adopt White culture. This idea, termed as assimilation, was based on the belief that it would be easier to merge the cultures and eliminate cultural differences rather than maintaining separate and distinct cultures. This ideology not only affected the native inhabitants of the Americas, but Indigenous peoples around the world.
Assimilation promoted the European lifestyle, compelling Indigenous tribes to abandon their traditional practices and customs in favor of those of the Western world. Politicians and authorities in the involved countries often enforced these policies, leading to numerous injustices and often resulting in the loss of indigenous cultures and languages.
Learn more about Assimilation here:https://brainly.com/question/8947259
#SPJ12
just need help with this 100 points cause why not.
Answer the reflection question in 4-5 complete sentences.
What was one positive item and one negative item of the Columbian Exchange? Explain each one’s impact.
Answer:
One positive item of the Columbian Exchange was the introduction of new crops and food items to different regions. For example, crops like maize (corn), potatoes, and tomatoes were brought from the Americas to Europe. These new food sources contributed to increased agricultural productivity, diversified diets, and population growth. This positive impact of the Columbian Exchange can be seen in the significant cultural and economic changes brought about by the adoption of these crops.
On the other hand, one negative item of the Columbian Exchange was the introduction of diseases to indigenous populations in the Americas. European explorers and settlers unknowingly brought diseases such as smallpox, measles, and influenza, which had devastating consequences for the Native American populations. Lack of immunity to these diseases resulted in high mortality rates and population decline among indigenous communities. This negative impact had long-lasting consequences on the social, cultural, and demographic landscape of the Americas.
Overall, while the Columbian Exchange brought positive outcomes such as the exchange of crops and cultural exchanges, it also had negative consequences in the form of disease transmission and population decline among indigenous peoples. Understanding both the positive and negative aspects of the Columbian Exchange is essential for a comprehensive analysis of its impact on global history.
Explanation:
Answer:
One positive item of the Columbian exchange was they gained crops such as maize, and potatoes along with more land in the Americas. This gave them good trading values they could use for themselves and to grow more powerful since they gained more land. The negativity of the Columbians was a mass number of people dying from various diseases which lead to decreation in the Columbian population. It was a horrific experience and they had to build thier population again cause of the deaths.
Explanation:
In 30 words or fewer, identify the Spanish advantage shown in the image on this page and explain whether it was limited to Pizarro's troops.
Answer:The Inca Empire fell to civil war, disease, and lack of integration. The Spanish, led by Francisco Pizarro, overpowered the Incas, resulting in a tragic event in American history.
:
The Regulator Movement was largely concerned with:(only one right answer)
a.Native American lands in the Ohio River Valley
b.North Carolina farmers rebelling
c.the Demarcation Line of 1763
d.the regulation of the tariff
e.the professional British troops stationed in Massaschussetts
f.the emergence of political parties
The Regulator Movement primarily focused on the rebellion of North Carolina farmers. Therefore, option b is correct.
The Regulator Movement was a colonial-era uprising that took place in North Carolina during the 1760s and 1770s. It was driven by grievances of backcountry farmers and settlers against corrupt officials, high taxes, and unfair practices.
The Regulators, as they were known, organized themselves to demand lower taxes, more transparent government, and improved access to justice.
The movement culminated in clashes with government forces, particularly during the Battle of Alamance in 1771. Although ultimately suppressed, the Regulator Movement highlighted discontent and played a role in the lead-up to the American Revolution.
Therefore, option b is correct.
Learn more about Regulator Movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/13410984
#SPJ4
Which Catholic order was most prominent in the early colonial
period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms?
a-Augustinians
b-Franciscans
c-Dominicans
d-Jesuits
The Catholic order which was most prominent in the early colonial period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms were the Franciscans. These religious orders were instrumental in the Spanish colonization of the Americas, in which they were used as a tool of cultural assimilation to convert indigenous peoples to Christianity.
The Catholic order which was most prominent in the early colonial period and encouraged syncretism with mass baptisms were the Franciscans. These religious orders were instrumental in the Spanish colonization of the Americas, in which they were used as a tool of cultural assimilation to convert indigenous peoples to Christianity.Franciscans were the first religious order to arrive in the Americas in 1523, and they were an essential part of the Spanish colonial project. The Franciscans' goal was to establish missions and teach Catholicism to the indigenous population. They encouraged syncretism, which is the blending of religious beliefs and practices. Mass baptisms were used to convert entire communities of indigenous people to Catholicism. They also established schools where they taught indigenous people how to read and write in Spanish. Their educational and conversion efforts were part of a larger campaign to create a more docile and controllable indigenous population that was loyal to the Spanish crown.Their efforts resulted in the cultural and religious syncretism that is present in many Latin American countries today. The Franciscans were instrumental in the colonization of Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. They played a significant role in the conversion of indigenous peoples and the establishment of the Catholic Church in the Americas.
To know more about Catholic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31679179
#SPJ11
Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to
• A. not interfere with existing European colonies in the Americas.
O B. become a colonial power with its own empire in the Americas.
• C. help European colonies in the Americas gain their independence.
D. fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
The correct answer is option D. Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas. This doctrine, declared by President James Monroe in 1823, asserted that the Americas were off-limits for any further colonization by European powers. The United States positioned itself as the protector of the independent nations in the Western Hemisphere and vowed to intervene if any European power attempted to establish new colonies or interfere with the sovereignty of existing nations in the Americas. The Monroe Doctrine solidified the United States' commitment to preserving the independence and autonomy of the American nations, establishing a significant precedent in American foreign policy.In conclusion, Under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States promised to fight any European country that sought new colonies in the Americas.
For more questions on Monroe Doctrine:
https://brainly.com/question/1808198
#SPJ8
In domestic policy, both presidents battled ___.
In domestic policy, both presidents battled economic instability, social inequality, and labor issues, among other things.
Despite the fact that their approaches and perspectives differed significantly, both presidents attempted to deal with these challenges during their tenure. Let's take a closer look at the specific domestic policies that each president pursued. Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), the 32nd president of the United States, was in office from 1933 until his death in 1945. He was a member of the Democratic Party and had a significant impact on domestic policy during his time in office.
FDR's presidency was characterized by the implementation of a variety of New Deal programs aimed at addressing the economic depression that had devastated the United States in the years leading up to his inauguration. He saw the government as having a significant role to play in addressing the country's economic issues, and his domestic policy initiatives reflected that belief.
In contrast, Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States, was a member of the Republican Party and served from 1981 until 1989. Reagan's domestic policies were based on the idea of laissez-faire economics, which emphasized the importance of free markets and limited government intervention in the economy. Reagan, for example, lowered tax rates and deregulated many industries, allowing the private sector to play a more significant role in economic growth. Reagan also promoted a conservative social agenda during his tenure in office, advocating for traditional family values and opposing abortion and gay rights.
While FDR's and Reagan's domestic policies differed significantly in their philosophy and approach, both presidents confronted similar challenges. For example, both administrations dealt with economic instability and attempted to address social inequality and labor issues. Despite the fact that they had different approaches to these challenges, their policies had a significant impact on the country and the political and economic systems that would follow.
Know more about Domestic policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/31526322
#SPJ8
Before the Constitution could go into effect,
A. 5...7
B. 9... 13
C. 13... 13
D. 45...50
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
O D
Previous Activity
of
states were required to approve
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Before the Constitution could go into effect, 9 out of 13 states were required to approve it. This is known as the ratification process, and it was outlined in Article VII of the Constitution. After the Constitution was drafted at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, it had to be sent to the states for ratification. The ratification process was intense and involved a great deal of debate and discussion, with supporters of the Constitution (known as Federalists) and opponents (known as Anti-Federalists) arguing over the proper role of the federal government and the protection of individual rights. Ultimately, the Constitution was ratified by 9 states by 1788 and went into effect in 1789.
What made it difficult for freed African Americans to take advantage of the
Homestead Act?
Answer: African Americans were granted priority access until January 1, 1867. However, a lack of agricultural resources (seeds, tools, and farm animals), the poor quality of most of the land, and persecution by whitesmade it difficult for African Americans to take advantage of this opportunity.
Explanation: does this help at all? Make sure to summarize
Why was the Emancipation Proclamation important to the Union's strategy
during the Civil War?
OA. It freed enslaved people in the border states if they provided labor
to the Union.
OB. It prevented antislavery countries from siding with the
Confederacy.
OC. It convinced smaller Confederate states to rejoin the Union
peacefully.
OD. It gave the Union military legal permission to destroy Southern
crops.
Answer:
The correct answer is not listed in the provided options. The Emancipation Proclamation was important to the Union's strategy during the Civil War because it declared that all enslaved persons in Confederate-held territory were to be considered free, and it helped to undermine the Confederacy's economic and labor system by depriving it of its primary source of labor. Additionally, it changed the nature of the war by making it a war for freedom as well as a war to preserve the Union, and it encouraged enslaved persons in the South to flee to Union lines, where they could be used as laborers and soldiers.
Explanation:
MIND MAP-Slave dynasty class 7
The Slave Dynasty, also known as the Mamluk Dynasty, was a period of Islamic rule in Delhi, India, from the 13th to the 16th century. It was established by a group of Turkish slaves who rose to power and became sultans of Delhi.
The Slave Dynasty in India began in 1206 when Qutb-ud-din Aibak, a Turkish slave of the Ghurid dynasty, established himself as the Sultan of Delhi. The dynasty was known for its lineage of rulers who were of slave origin. They were military commanders and bureaucrats who had been brought to India as slaves and eventually became powerful rulers.
During the Slave Dynasty, several significant developments took place. The construction of the Qutub Minar, the first mosque in India, and the consolidation of Islamic rule in northern India were notable achievements. The dynasty faced challenges from external invasions, such as the Mongols, and internal conflicts among different factions. Despite these challenges, the Slave Dynasty managed to maintain control over Delhi and parts of northern India for nearly a century.The Slave Dynasty played a crucial role in laying the foundation for subsequent Muslim dynasties in India, such as the Khilji and Tughlaq dynasties. Their rule contributed to the spread of Islam and the introduction of Persian and Central Asian cultural influences in the region.The dynasty's influence on architecture, administration, and the arts can still be seen in various historical monuments and structures in Delhi and other parts of India.
For more questions on Slave Dynasty
https://brainly.com/question/28632261
#SPJ8
Lost Generation writers, such as Gertrude Stein and F. Scott Fitzgerald, were influenced by:____.
a. the rejection of traditional White American ideas. b. the rise of the Cold War in the United States. c. the stock market crash of 1929. d. the rearmament before World War II.
c. the stock market crash of 1929.
The Lost Generation writers were indeed influenced by the stock market crash of 1929. This event, also known as the Great Crash, had a profound impact on American society and culture, including the literary world. The economic collapse that followed the crash led to widespread disillusionment, unemployment, and a sense of instability. The Lost Generation writers captured the disillusionment and despair of the post-war era, reflecting the shattered dreams and disillusionment felt by many Americans during the 1920s and 1930s.
The Lost Generation writers were a group of American authors who came of age during World War I and the aftermath of the war. They were known for their disillusionment with the values and ideals of the pre-war society and explored themes of alienation, moral decay, and the search for meaning in their works. While they were influenced by various factors, such as the rejection of traditional White American ideas and the rearmament before World War II, the stock market crash of 1929 was a significant event that had a direct impact on their writing.
The stock market crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression brought about economic hardship, unemployment, and social upheaval. The economic collapse shattered the optimism and materialistic excesses of the 1920s and exposed the underlying flaws of the American Dream. The Lost Generation writers, including Gertrude Stein and F. Scott Fitzgerald, responded to this tumultuous period by exploring themes of disillusionment, moral decay, and the loss of traditional values in their works. They depicted the social and psychological impact of the economic crisis on individuals and society, capturing the sense of dislocation and alienation experienced by many during that time.
In conclusion, while the Lost Generation writers were influenced by various factors, including the rejection of traditional White American ideas and the rearmament before World War II, it was the stock market crash of 1929 and the resulting Great Depression that had a profound impact on their work. The economic collapse and its aftermath shaped their portrayal of a society in crisis and contributed to their exploration of themes such as disillusionment, moral decay, and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world.
To learn more about rearmament click here:
brainly.com/question/734502
#SPJ11
How did whiteness and wealth become intertwined
following WWII? How does the current wealth gap in the US reflect
this history?
Following WWII, whiteness and wealth became intertwined as a result of various factors, including government policies, structural inequality, and economic growth. This is evident in the current wealth gap in the US, which reflects this history.
In the post-WWII era, the United States experienced a period of significant economic growth. The growth of the economy was driven by a combination of government policies and private-sector investments. During this time, many Americans gained access to new opportunities and enjoyed higher living standards. However, these gains were not distributed equally across the population. Instead, they were primarily concentrated among white Americans who held positions of power and influence in society. The government played a crucial role in creating the conditions that facilitated the growth of the economy. For instance, the government invested heavily in infrastructure, education, and other public services that supported economic growth. Additionally, the government implemented policies that favored white Americans over other groups. For example, the government provided generous subsidies and loans to white families to help them buy homes in suburban areas. This policy created a significant wealth gap between white Americans and African Americans, who were excluded from these opportunities. Structural inequality also played a role in creating the wealth gap. For example, many African Americans were excluded from jobs in high-paying industries, such as manufacturing and finance. Additionally, many were forced to live in segregated neighborhoods with fewer public services and higher crime rates. These conditions made it more difficult for African Americans to accumulate wealth and pass it on to future generations. Today, the wealth gap in the US continues to reflect this history. According to recent data, the median net worth of white households in the US is roughly 10 times higher than that of African American households. Additionally, white households are more likely to own homes, have retirement savings, and inherit wealth from their parents. Overall, the wealth gap reflects the historical legacy of policies and practices that favored white Americans over other groups.
To learn more about the wealth gap Visit: brainly.com/question/1699477
#SPJ11
How did the incentives of the colonists differ from the incentives of the Virginia company
The incentives of the colonists and the Virginia Company differed in their motivations and goals. The colonists sought personal and economic opportunities, while the Virginia Company aimed to establish profitable ventures and expand English influence in the New World.
The colonists who migrated to Virginia in the early 17th century were driven by various incentives. Many sought economic opportunities, such as the chance to acquire land, establish successful farms, and engage in profitable trade.
Others were motivated by the desire for religious freedom, political autonomy, or the chance to start anew in a new land. The colonists were primarily focused on their individual goals and aspirations, aiming to improve their own lives and secure their own prosperity.
On the other hand, the Virginia Company, a joint-stock company established by English investors, had different incentives. The company sought to make profits from its investments in the New World. Its primary goal was to establish successful colonies that would generate wealth for the company and its shareholders. The Virginia Company aimed to exploit the region's resources, particularly the cultivation of tobacco, and establish trade networks that would benefit English commerce. Their motivation was more focused on financial gain and expanding English influence and power in the New World.Overall, while the colonists had personal and economic motivations, the Virginia Company was primarily driven by the desire for profitable ventures and the advancement of English interests in the colonization of Virginia.
For more questions on colonists
https://brainly.com/question/17745401
#SPJ8
Convincing your parents to let you stay out after your curfew is an example of
what?
A. Philosophy
B. Hyperbole
C. Rhetoric
D. Nonverbal communication
Answer:
The answer to your question would be C. Rhetoric.
Explanation:
C. Rhetoric is the correct answer because it involves using persuasive language and communication techniques to convince your parents to let you stay out after your curfew.
The partition of France and Britain to the former territories of the Ottoman empire was a betrayal to their promise of Independence made by them during the World War I not just to the Ottomans but also to other ethnicity within West Asia, why is it so?
The partition of France and Britain to the former territories of the Ottoman Empire was a betrayal of their promise of independence made during World War I due to geopolitical interests and the pursuit of colonial control.
During World War I, France and Britain issued declarations and made promises to various ethnic and national groups within the Ottoman Empire, including Arabs, Kurds, and Armenians, that they would support their aspirations for independence and self-determination. However, after the war, instead of fulfilling these promises, the two powers engaged in a process of partitioning the former Ottoman territories for their own strategic and economic interests.
The primary motivation behind this betrayal was the pursuit of colonial control and influence in the region. France and Britain sought to establish their dominance and maintain a grip on the valuable resources and trade routes in the Middle East. They aimed to secure access to oil reserves, maintain control over crucial waterways like the Suez Canal, and establish spheres of influence that would serve their economic and geopolitical interests.
In the process of partitioning the Ottoman territories, the principles of self-determination and independence for the local ethnic and national groups were disregarded. The Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 between Britain and France, for example, divided the region into separate spheres of influence, primarily serving the interests of the colonial powers. This led to the creation of artificial borders that often ignored the cultural, ethnic, and religious realities of the local populations.
Moreover, the partitioning of the Ottoman territories resulted in the imposition of colonial rule and the suppression of nationalist movements. Local populations, who had fought alongside the Allies during the war with the hope of achieving independence, were left disillusioned and betrayed by the actions of France and Britain. This betrayal fueled resentment, conflicts, and instability in the region, contributing to long-lasting political, social, and ethnic tensions that continue to shape the Middle East today.
In summary, the partition of the former Ottoman territories by France and Britain after World War I represented a betrayal of their promises of independence and self-determination. The pursuit of colonial control, strategic interests, and economic advantages overshadowed the principles of justice, self-governance, and respect for the aspirations of the local populations. The consequences of this betrayal continue to have a profound impact on the political landscape and dynamics in the Middle East.
To learn more about movements click here:
brainly.com/question/30932463
#SPJ11
Archduke Franz
Ferdinand was
assassinated.
?
Powerful countries
were locked into
alliances with
small countries.
The Ottoman and
Austro-Hungarian
empires began to
weaken.
Which phrase best completes the graphic organizer?
OA. Results of World War I
OB. Reasons for Russia's withdrawal from World War I
OC. Causes of World War I
OD. Reasons for U.S. entry into World War I
4
The phrase that best completes the graphic organizer is "OC. Causes of World War I.
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary, as mentioned in the graphic, was one of the key events that triggered the outbreak of World War I. The assassination took place on June 28, 1914, in Sarajevo, when a Serbian nationalist assassinated the Archduke and his wife. This event heightened tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, eventually leading to a series of diplomatic and military actions that culminated in the war.
The graphic also mentions that powerful countries were locked into alliances with small countries. This refers to the complex system of alliances that had been established among European nations prior to the war. These alliances were intended to provide mutual defense and deter aggression. However, when one country in an alliance was attacked, it resulted in a domino effect, pulling other countries into the conflict. For example, Austria-Hungary's ally, Germany, became involved when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.
Additionally, the graphic mentions that the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires began to weaken. This refers to the declining power and influence of these empires in the years leading up to World War I. The weakening of these empires created power vacuums and heightened tensions in the regions they controlled, contributing to the overall instability that led to the outbreak of the war.
for more questions on World War I.
https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ8
The appellate court system in Georgla was established by what?
the supreme court
constitutional amendment
Ostate statute
OU.S. statute
The appellate court system in Georgia was established primarily by state statutes, not by the Supreme Court or a constitutional amendment.
The appellate court system in Georgia was established by a combination of the state constitution, state statutes, and the decisions of the Georgia Supreme Court. While the Georgia Supreme Court plays a vital role in the overall judiciary system, it is not solely responsible for establishing the appellate court system.
Firstly, the state constitution of Georgia provides the framework for the establishment and organization of the state's courts, including the appellate courts. The Constitution delineates the powers and jurisdiction of the courts, as well as the process for appointing or electing judges. It serves as the foundational document upon which the court system is built.
Secondly, the Georgia General Assembly, the state's legislative body, enacts laws and statutes that govern the operations of the appellate courts. These statutes define the appellate court structure, outline the procedures for appeals, and specify the qualifications and tenure of judges.
Additionally, the decisions rendered by the Georgia Supreme Court, as the highest court in the state, contribute to the development and evolution of the appellate court system. The Georgia Supreme Court's interpretations of the state constitution and statutes, as well as its precedents, influence the functioning of the appellate courts and guide their decision-making process.
In conclusion, the appellate court system in Georgia was established by a combination of the state constitution, state statutes, and the decisions of the Georgia Supreme Court. It is the interplay of these legal instruments and authorities that forms the foundation of the appellate court system in Georgia.
Know more about Georgia Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/30801594
#SPJ8
Article 24
Publications and the press have freedom of
expression except when it is detrimental to the
fundamental principles of Islam or the rights of the
public. The details of this exception will be specified
by law
||
What can we learn about the priorities of the new Iranian government based on this section(s) of their constitution?
The new Iranian government prioritizes the preservation of fundamental Islamic principles and the rights of the public.
Based on this section of the Iranian constitution, we can infer that the new Iranian government places a significant emphasis on the preservation of fundamental Islamic principles and the rights of the public. The provision acknowledges the freedom of expression for publications and the press, which indicates a recognition of the importance of open discourse and the exchange of ideas. However, it also establishes an exception to this freedom when it is deemed detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam or the rights of the public.This suggests that the Iranian government prioritizes the protection of Islamic values and the well-being of the public over unrestricted freedom of expression. By specifying that the details of this exception will be defined by law, the government aims to maintain control and regulate any expression that conflicts with Islamic principles or poses a threat to public rights. This reflects a desire to strike a balance between individual liberties and the preservation of religious and societal norms.Overall, the provision indicates that the new Iranian government seeks to uphold Islamic principles and safeguard the interests and rights of the public while exercising a level of control over the media and expression to ensure compliance with these priorities.For more questions on Islam
https://brainly.com/question/4466
#SPJ8
If joseph Stalin had set lower production quotas for his first five year plan he would have..
Answer:he would have achieved less impressive results, but at less cost to workers.
Explanation: