Answer:
Explanation:
Harvey Milk was a political activist and the first openly gay elected official in the history of California. His main goal was to fight for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community and to promote equality and acceptance.
His motivation was driven by his personal experiences and the discrimination he faced as a gay man. He believed that everyone deserved the right to live freely and openly, without fear of persecution or discrimination. He saw himself as a representative of the LGBTQ+ community and was determined to use his position to advocate for their rights.
Milk faced both internal and external conflicts in his fight for equality. Internally, he struggled with his own fears and doubts about his abilities to make a real difference. He also faced the challenge of being open about his sexuality in a time when homosexuality was widely stigmatized and criminalized.
Externally, Milk faced significant opposition from conservative politicians and organizations, who were opposed to his message of equality and acceptance. He was often met with hostility and even violence, and his life was ultimately cut short when he was assassinated by a political opponent.
Despite these challenges, Milk remained committed to his goal of promoting equality and acceptance. He believed that change was possible, and he worked tirelessly to inspire others to join him in the fight for a more just and equitable society.
Answer:
Harvey Milk was an American politician and gay rights activist who served as a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in the late 1970s. His mission was to advocate for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community and to put an end to the discrimination they faced. Milk's motivation was derived from his own experiences of being disregarded and overlooked as a gay man. He was dedicated to the concept of equal rights and saw it as vital for the LGBTQ+ community to be visible and vocal in their pursuit of fairness. Milk's inner struggle likely manifested as the discord between his desire to live openly as a gay man and the public pressure to adhere to heteronormative ideals, which is apparent in his decision to come out at a later stage of life and his eventual choice to take up a career in politics as an openly gay man. Externally, Milk was met with vehement opposition from those who dissented his message of equality and acceptance. He endured persistent harassment and discrimination, both on a personal and political level. Milk's activism and political career eventually ended in tragedy with his assassination in 1978 by a former colleague on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
while president, theodore roosevelt chose to label his reform proposals as the a square deal. b fair deal. c new deal. d big deal. e big stick.
Answer:
A. Square Deal
Theodore Roosevelt's domestic program, also known as the "Square Deal," sought to ensure fair bargaining for all interests, including consumers, workers, and corporations. The correct answer is B: Fair Deal.
His Fair Deal proposed legislation to regulate the food, drug, and public utility industries, and aimed to help the poor.
Theodore Roosevelt's domestic program, known as the Square Deal, was built on the three major ideas of conservation of natural resources, control of corporations, and consumer protection.
He also sought to ensure fair bargaining for all interests, leading to his Fair Deal. This proposed legislation sought to regulate the food, drug, and public utility industries, and aimed to help the poor. The correct answer is B
To know more about Theodore Roosevelt refer to-
brainly.com/question/29359038#
#SPJ11
how did the soviet union respond when the united states, great britain, and france introduced a separate currency in their zones within occupied berlin?
When the United States, Great Britain, and France introduced a separate currency in their zones within occupied Berlin, the Soviet Union responded by imposing a blockade of the city. The Berlin Blockade was a Soviet attempt to prevent the Western Allies from accessing their sectors of Berlin, which were located in the Soviet occupation zone.
The Berlin Blockade began on June 24, 1948, when Soviet troops blocked all road, rail, and water access to Berlin from the Western Allies' zones. The Soviet Union hoped to force the Western Allies to abandon Berlin or negotiate Soviet control over the entire city. This led to a tense standoff between the two superpowers that lasted for over a year.
In response to the Berlin Blockade, the Western Allies began airlifting food, fuel, and other essential supplies into the city. The Berlin Airlift was a massive logistical effort that involved hundreds of planes flying around the clock to keep the city supplied. The airlift was a resounding success, and by the time the blockade was lifted on May 12, 1949, the Western Allies had flown over 2.3 million tons of supplies into the city.
The Berlin Blockade was a turning point in the Cold War. It demonstrated the determination of the Western Allies to defend their interests in Europe and marked the beginning of a long struggle between the Soviet Union and the West.
Know more about Berlin Blockade here:
https://brainly.com/question/3798821
#SPJ11
what social and/or cultural differences are there between the colonists and the british in the metropole?
The social and cultural differences between the colonists and the British in the metropole were quite vast. Colonists in the New World were a very diverse group of people, coming from different cultures, languages, and backgrounds. On the other hand, the British in the metropole had more homogeneity.
Their society was more formal and structured, whereas the American colonists tended to be more informal and independent. In terms of social structures, the British in the metropole had an upper class and a lower class, with a well-defined hierarchy.
However, the colonists in the New World were more likely to value individual freedom and were less likely to accept a structured hierarchy. Religion was another difference between the two societies. The British in the metropole were primarily members of the Anglican Church, while the colonists in the New World could practice a variety of faiths.
n terms of culture, the British in the metropole were more focused on tradition and decorum. They had a more refined view of art and literature and were more likely to embrace conventions. On the other hand, the colonists in the New World were more likely to embrace diversity and new ideas. They valued creativity and innovation, and were more likely to question traditional authority.
In conclusion, the social and cultural differences between the colonists and the British in the metropole were quite distinct. The colonists valued individual freedom and creativity, while the British in the metropole had a more structured society with a well-defined hierarchy.
To learn more about Colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/457399#
#SPJ4
after world war ii, which government institution first began drawing attention to the problem of racism in america?
The answer to your question is the United States Commission on Civil Rights. This government institution was created in 1957, shortly after World War II, to investigate and draw attention to civil rights violations and issues of racism in America.
1. After World War II, the United States Commission on Civil Rights was established in 1957.
2. This government institution began drawing attention to civil rights violations and the problem of racism in America.
3. The Commission also focused on enforcing civil rights laws, increasing public understanding of civil rights issues, and recommending changes to civil rights laws.
To know more about United States Commission on Civil Rights refer to-
brainly.com/question/1527526#
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Read the excerpt from the passage where the Oregon settler argues that Chief Joseph was a helpful and kind man.
(6) One early Oregon settler told of his encounter with Chief Joseph:
(7) Why I got lost once, an' I came right on [Chief Joseph's] camp before I knowed it…'t was night, 'n' I was kind o' creepin' along cautious, an' the first thing I knew there was an Injun had me on each side, an' they jest marched me up to Jo's tent, to know what they should do with me….
(8) Well, Jo, he took up a torch, a pine knot he had burnin', and he held it close't up to my face, and looked me up an' down, an' down an' up; an' I never flinched; I jest looked him up an' down 's good 's he did me; 'n' then he set the knot down, 'n' told the men it was all right, –I was`tum tum;' that meant I was good heart; 'n' they gave me all I could eat, 'n' a guide to show me my way, next day, 'n' I could n't make Jo nor any of 'em take one cent. I had a kind o' comforter o' red yarn, I wore round my neck; an' at last I got Jo to take that, jest as a kind o' momento.
Which sentence best explains the reasoning for the Oregon settler's argument that Chief Joseph is a fair and kind man?
A.
The settler's reasoning is valid because he provides a secondhand account.
B.
The settler's reasoning is invalid because the evidence is irrelevant.
C.
The settler's reasoning is invalid because the evidence is insufficient.
D.
The settler's reasoning is valid because he provides a firsthand account.
The sentence that best explains the reasoning for the Oregon settler's argument that Chief Joseph is a fair and kind man is D. The settler's reasoning is valid because he provides a firsthand account.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
briefly explain how one specific event or historical development was used by opponents of going to war against britain in 1812
The opponents of going to war against Britain in 1812 used several events and developments to support their stance. One such event was the issue of impressment. Impressment was the practice of forcing American sailors to serve in the British Navy and had been a contentious issue since the end of the War of 1812.
This practice had led to the United States government enacting the Embargo Act of 1807, which was meant to hurt Britain economically, but also caused great hardship for American merchants. This was seen as a violation of American sovereignty and as a result, many people began to oppose the war.
The Second Great Awakening also had a role in the anti-war sentiment of 1812. This religious revival, which spread across the United States and peaked between 1820-1840, changed the spiritual and political landscape of the nation.
Finally, the anti-war sentiment in 1812 was also bolstered by a number of political developments. This included the election of James Madison to the Presidency in 1808, which signaled a new era of Democratic-Republican rule in the United States. This party was largely opposed to war, and as a result, Madison and his cabinet refused to declare war against Britain in 1812. This sentiment was further reinforced by the victory of the Federalists in the Congressional elections of 1810, which increased the power of the anti-war forces in the government.
In conclusion, the opponents of war against Britain in 1812 used a variety of events and developments to support their stance. These included the issue of impressment, the Second Great Awakening, and the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party. All of these factors contributed to the strong anti-war sentiment that eventually led to the United States avoiding war with Britain.
To know more about Second Great Awakening refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/3631198
#SPJ11
Briefly explain one example of how people resisted the changes brought by migration in the same period 1910-1940?
An example of how people resisted the changes brought by migration in the period 1910-1940 is Mexican Repatriation.
What was the Mexican Repatriation?The Mexican Repatriation was a mass deportation campaign carried out by the US government between 1929 and 1936, during which an estimated 1 million people of Mexican descent, including US citizens, were forcibly removed from the United States and sent to Mexico.
This campaign was fueled by anti-immigrant sentiment and a desire to free up jobs for American citizens during the Great Depression.
While some Mexicans left voluntarily, many others were rounded up and deported by force, often without due process or legal representation.
Find out more on the Mexican Repatriation at https://brainly.com/question/26928668
#SPJ1
which country was most responsible for the change in us foreign policy at the end the the 18th century
The United States foreign policy changed significantly at the end of the 18th century due to the involvement of France.
The French Revolution led to the outbreak of the French Revolutionary Wars in 1792, which changed the balance of power in Europe and led to the end of French dominance. This had a major impact on the United States as they sought to maintain neutrality while simultaneously trying to trade with both France and Britain.
The situation further deteriorated when France declared war on Britain in 1793, leading to the US being drawn into the conflict. Ultimately, it was France that was responsible for the change in US foreign policy at the end of the 18th century.
To know more about foreign policy click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29822820#
#SPJ11
Can someone help me given Brainly
Your best fit is…
(Committed. Conservatives)
…. Along with 7% the public
Committed Conservatives
Staunchly conservative and overwhelmingly Republican, Committed Conservatives hold pro-business views traditionally associated with the Republican Party, have favorable attitudes about international trade and favor limited government. Their approach to international relations centers on engaging with U.S. Allie’s and maintaining American military might. Committed Conservatives tend to hold more moderate positions on immigration than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right. They also are slightly more moderate than these groups on some issues related to racial and ethnic equality. While they largely supported Donald Trump in 2020, they are less likely than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right to favor a major role for Trump in their party’s future.
Do you Agree or Disagree of Committed Conservatives why or why not write about it ?
Compared to Faith & Flag Conservatives as well as the Populist Right, two other extreme conservative factions in the Republican coalition.
How well do you understand conservatives?Committed Conservatives have a tendency to hold more moderate views on immigration.
On some matters pertaining to ethnic and racial equality, they are also a little more moderate than all these groupings, but they remain more conservative than that of the Democratic-leaning groups. Conservatives supported enduring cultural and traditional values. They were the royalty and nobility's supporters. They thought that there should be royal and noble privileges. They argued that society should undergo progressive reform in the wake of the French Revolution.
To know more about Committed Conservatives visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31280049
#SPJ1
the first mathematician to come close to calculating pi
Archimedes of Syracuse is the first mathematician to have presented a formula for computing pi.
The simplest way to calculate Pi () is to select the most ideal circle, measure its circumference and diameter, and then calculate Pi (). Through the use of this measurement technique, ancient cultures discovered that every circle had a fixed ratio.
The first calculation of pi () was made by Archimedes of Syracuse, one of the greatest mathematicians in antiquity. In order to determine the area of a circle, Archimedes used the Pythagorean Theorem to calculate the areas of two regular polygons: the polygon that made up the circle and the polygon that surrounded it.
Since the actual area of the circle lies between the areas of the inscribed and circumscribed polygons, the areas of the polygons provided upper and lower bounds for its size.
Archimedes understood that his calculation of the value of pi was only an approximate estimate within predetermined limits. Archimedes proved that pi lies between 3 *1/7 and 3 *10/71.
Learn more about Archimedes of Syracuse at:
brainly.com/question/14962628
#SPJ4
pearl harbor and 9/11 Answer Questions below in complete sentences. How did each of these events change America? What were each of the attackers trying to achieve? To what extent did the attackers achieve their goals? Why did the attackers select these specific targets? . In what ways could/should we have been more prepared for these attacks? What lessons can we learn from these events?
The Pearl Harbor and 9/11 attacks were significant events that changed America in several ways.
When did Pearl Harbor happen?The Pearl Harbor attack on December 7, 1941, caused the United States to enter World War II, and it led to a significant increase in military spending and preparedness. The 9/11 terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, resulted in changes to national security policies and increased surveillance efforts.
The attackers of Pearl Harbor were Japanese military forces, who sought to weaken the US military and establish dominance in the Pacific. The 9/11 attackers were members of the terrorist group Al-Qaeda, who sought to strike a blow against US power and influence.
The attackers achieved some of their goals, but ultimately failed in their larger objectives. The Pearl Harbor attack damaged the US Pacific Fleet, but did not prevent the US from eventually winning the war. The 9/11 attacks caused significant loss of life and disrupted American society, but they did not lead to the collapse of the US government or economy.
The attackers selected these specific targets because they represented symbols of American power and influence. Pearl Harbor was the home of the US Pacific Fleet, while the World Trade Center and Pentagon were symbols of American economic and military power, respectively.
In hindsight, we could have been more prepared for these attacks by increasing our intelligence-gathering efforts and improving our security measures. We can learn from these events that we must remain vigilant against threats to our national security and continually adapt to new challenges.
Read more about Pearl Harbor here:
https://brainly.com/question/15565398
#SPJ1
why did farmers express discontent during 1870-1900 and what impact did their new attitudes and actions have on national politics
The farmers expressed discontent during 1870-1900 due to expansion of corporate and rail power, rise in commodity prices, and economic depression. The Populist Party impacted by increasing importance of small businesses and farmers and protect them from large corporations.
During the period of 1870-1900, farmers expressed discontent due to a variety of reasons. These included the expansion of corporate and rail power, the rise in commodity prices, and the persistent economic depression of the late 19th century.
Additionally, the money supply of the nation was largely in the hands of a few powerful people and banks, leading to higher interest rates, while farmers saw their profits shrink. This dissatisfaction caused a movement towards reform which developed into the Populist Party.
The Populist Party sought to help farmers, laborers, and small businesses by advocating for a national monetary system, regulation of railroads, direct election of senators, and other reforms. These ideas were seen as radical by many, and the party faced opposition from established political figures.
Know more about Populist Party here:
https://brainly.com/question/27876627
#SPJ11
which statement best evaluates the purpose of the illustration of africa?
The purpose of illustrations of Africa is to B. provide a visual representation of the continent's diverse cultures and landscapes.
What is Africa known for ?The purpose of the illustration of Africa is to provide a visual representation of the continent's diverse cultures and landscapes. Africa is a continent with over 50 countries, each with its own unique history, culture, and geography.
The illustration could serve as a tool for promoting tourism by highlighting the beauty and diversity of African landscapes and attractions. However, the primary purpose of the illustration is likely to be to showcase the continent's cultural and geographic diversity.
Find out more on illustrations at https://brainly.com/question/23884835
#SPJ1
Options for this question are:
The purpose of the illustration of Africa is to promote tourism.The purpose of the illustration of Africa is to provide a visual representation of the continent's diverse cultures and landscapes.The purpose of the illustration of Africa is to promote a particular political ideology or agenda.The purpose of the illustration of Africa is to depict the continent as a monolithic, primitive, and exotic place.close ties between native americans and the british and spanish forces in which areas helped bring about the war of 1812?
Close ties between Native Americans and British and Spanish forces in the Great Lakes region and the Southeast helped bring about the War of 1812.
In the Great Lakes region, the British had formed alliances with several Native American tribes, including the Shawnee, Miami, and Potawatomi. These alliances were part of a larger strategy to limit American expansion into the region and protect British interests in Canada. The Native Americans were promised weapons, supplies, and support in exchange for their assistance in the conflict.
In the Southeast, the Spanish had formed alliances with the Creek and Seminole tribes. The Spanish were concerned about American expansion into Florida and sought to use the Native Americans as a buffer against American encroachment. The Native Americans were promised arms, ammunition, and protection in exchange for their loyalty.These alliances and the conflict they generated between the Native Americans and American settlers played a significant role in the outbreak of the War of 1812. American expansion was seen as a threat to Native American sovereignty and territorial rights, and the British and Spanish were seen as allies who could help protect their interests.The British and Spanish were also seen as supporters of American trade restrictions and impressment of American sailors, which were major causes of the war. The Native Americans' alliances with these powers further fueled tensions and made it more difficult for the United States to negotiate a peaceful settlement to the conflict.In summary, the close ties between Native Americans and British and Spanish forces in the Great Lakes region and the Southeast were contributing factors to the outbreak of the War of 1812.
Learn more about the War of 1812:
https://brainly.com/question/20635835
#SPJ11
describe why colonists feared the changes in british imperial legislation after 1763, and why those fears led to the american revolution.
Colonists feared the changes in British imperial legislation after 1763 because the proclamation prohibited movement west of the Appalachian Mountains this lead to American revolution.
In order to get additional land, colonists desired to go westward into these new areas, but Britain approved the Proclamation of 1763 out of concern about potential clashes with Native Americans. Several colonists were disturbed by the announcement because they wanted to migrate west of the Appalachian Mountains to improve their fortune.
No British person on either side of the Atlantic could have predicted the future battles between the home nation and its North American colonies when the French and Indian War finally came to a conclusion in 1763. But even so, this battle also served as a catalyst for the hostilities that followed. Remember that the French and Indian War, often known as the Seven Years' War in Europe, was a worldwide battle.
Although defeating France and its allies, Great Britain paid a high price for the triumph. The national debt of Great Britain reached more than 122 million pounds [the British currency] in January 1763, which was a sizable amount at the time.
Learn more about American Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/7486570
#SPJ4
Why do some Americans want to limit immigration to the United States?
They believe immigrants have nothing to contribute to American culture.
They believe immigrants resist assimilation into American society.
They believe immigrants hurt the economy as consumers.
scholarship indicates that there have been how many waves of democratization in the world since 1825?
There have been four main waves of democratization in the world since 1825. The first wave of democratization began in the early 19th century, with countries like the United States, France, and the United Kingdom democratizing.
The second wave of democratization began in the late 19th century and was concentrated in Latin America. The third wave of democratization occurred in the mid-20th century and saw a spread of democratic rule to countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. The fourth and most recent wave of democratization began in the late 20th century and has been largely concentrated in post-Communist countries in Europe and Eurasia.
Since 1825, there have been four distinct waves of democratization across the world. The first wave of democratization began in the early 19th century and focused primarily on Europe and the Americas. The second wave of democratization occurred in the late 19th century and was mainly concentrated in Latin America.
The third wave of democratization occurred in the mid-20th century and saw a spread of democratic rule to countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. The fourth and most recent wave of democratization began in the late 20th century and has been largely concentrated in post-Communist countries in Europe and Eurasia.
To know more about democratization refer to-
brainly.com/question/14320124#
#SPJ11
when the six boys were captured by the two rebels, how did the rebels say they were going to initiate them into becoming rebels themselves?
The two rebels stated that they were going to initiate the six boys into becoming rebels themselves by teaching them how to shoot a gun and how to fight.
The two rebels sought to transform the six boys into rebels by teaching them basic combat skills, such as how to use a gun and how to fight in a physical confrontation.
To know more about rebel refer to-
brainly.com/question/24589948#
#SPJ11
Describe TWO problems that the 1st four Presidents had to deal with. YOU MUST DESCRIBE THE PROBLEMS AND NOT JUST LIST THEM!
The first four Presidents of the United States (Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison) had to deal with many issues, both domestic and foreign. Two of the main problems they had to confront were the establishment of a strong central government and the balance of power between the states and the federal government.
Domestically, they had to contend with the delicate balance between the needs of the federal government, which wanted to create a powerful and unified nation, and the need of the states to remain independent and maintain their own sovereignty. This conflict of interests had to be addressed through a series of compromises, such as the establishment of a bicameral legislature and the ratification of the Bill of Rights.
In foreign affairs, the first four Presidents had to navigate a complex system of European powers and their various alliances. This included dealing with the British in the Jay Treaty of 1795, the Quasi-War with France in 1798, and the Louisiana Purchase from Napoleon in 1803. In each case, they had to assess the diplomatic and economic benefits of each course of action while avoiding any foreign entanglements that could potentially damage the nation's fragile stability.
For such more question on Presidents:
https://brainly.com/question/971935
#SPJ11
compare and contrast changes in the government, economy, and society from the romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the bolsheviks. write one to two paragraphs that identify and compare these periods in russia.
The Romanov Era is the period of Imperial Russia. During this period, the Romanov family managed Russia through an arrangement of outright government. The tsar had unlimited authority over all parts of government, and his position was inherited.
Numerous parts of society, the economy, and the public authority changed when this progress occurred. As far as society, respectability lost a ton of force and acknowledgment, as the Trotskyites attempted to make these titles outdated.
This carried more friendly uniformity to individuals. One more significant change was about religion, as the Marxists didn't imagine that religion had a spot in a socialist country. Concerning the economy, the Soviet Association saw extraordinary modernization. The nation went from a for the most part agrarian economy.
Learn more about Romanov era:
https://brainly.com/question/30289462
#SPJ4
African Americans
organize black
churches in the
South during the
post-Reconstruction
era.
Northern black
churches are
influenced by
southerners during
the Great Migration.
▸
Which sentence best completes this sequence of events?
A The temperance movement begins.
B
Religious schools are granted federal aid.
Protest music becomes a popular genre.
C
?
3
Answer:
maybe, C- African Americans establish civil rights organizations to fight for equality and combat discrimination ?
Explanation:
I hope this helps
imagine yourself as winston smith at the beginning of 1984. what would you do to undermine the party? knowing what you know now, how would you extricate yourself from the fate that awaits you?
At the beginning of 1984, Winston Smith would attempt to undermine the Party in any way he could.
He would likely attempt to find someone who is also an enemy of the Party and form an alliance. He could also spread any anti-Party ideas he finds, as well as finding ways to disrupt the Party's systems.
Knowing what he knows now, Winston would attempt to flee the country or find some way to hide from the Party. He could also attempt to form a larger resistance movement against the Party and unite the people against them.
Overall, Winston would try to find a way to avoid the fate that awaits him and actively fight back against the Party.
To know more about resistance movement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16286343#
#SPJ11
Which statement best explains a social impact of the Industrial Revolution?
A. More families started to join religious groups.
B. People began to leave rural areas to work in cities.
C. Access to education increased across the southern states.
D. Recreational activities like sports and games became more popular.
To work in cities, people started to migrate from rural areas. (Choice b)
How does the Industrial Revolution affect society and families?The fast urbanisation, or influx of people into cities, brought about by the Industrial Revolution. Many individuals moved from fields to cities as a result of changes in farming, rapid population increase, and a growing need for employment. Little communities around coal and iron mines grew into cities almost immediately.
The farmers started looking for alternative occupations after losing their farms to wealthier landlords. They therefore looked for employment in manufacturing. So, you might say that individuals started migrating from rural areas to urban centres to work.
To know more about urbanisation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12007420
#SPJ1
Why did the Sons of Liberty dress up as Native Americans and dump tea in the Boston Harbor?
Answer:
The Sons of Liberty dressed up as Native Americans and dumped tea in the Boston Harbor as a protest against the Tea Act of 1773. The Tea Act was a law passed by the British government that imposed a tax on tea imported to the American colonies. The Sons of Liberty viewed the Tea Act as an unjust taxation without representation and a violation of their rights as British citizens. The Boston Tea Party was a symbolic act of defiance against the British government and a rallying cry for the American Revolution.
as ruler of the mauryan empire, ashoka sought to rule in accordance with ahimsa, which is best defined as
Ashoka sought to rule the Mauryan Empire in accordance with Ahimsa, which is best defined as a policy of non-violence, truthfulness, and non-injury to all living creatures.
Ahimsa is derived from the Sanskrit language, and it encompasses the idea of avoiding intentional harm to other living creatures. It is often used in reference to religion, particularly Jainism and Buddhism, as both religions seek to reduce suffering and prevent harm.
Ahimsa seeks to promote peace, respect, and understanding in relationships between humans and other creatures. In Ashoka's Mauryan Empire, this meant not only avoiding physical violence, but also refraining from mental and verbal harm.
Ahimsa is an important part of Jain and Buddhist teachings, and Ashoka sought to follow these principles in his rule of the Mauryan Empire.
To know more about physical violence click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29970467#
#SPJ11
to what extent did franklin roosevelts administration succeed in responding to the problems of the great depression from 1933-1941
To what extent did Franklin Roosevelt's administration succeed in responding to the problems of the Great Depression from 1933-1941?The administration of Franklin Roosevelt was successful in addressing the issues of the Great Depression from 1933 to 1941. The president's main objective was to revive the economy and alleviate the effects of the Depression, and he accomplished this in several ways.
Firstly, Roosevelt's government implemented the New Deal, a series of economic programs that aimed to stimulate the economy, create jobs, and provide economic relief. The Social Security Act of 1935, the Works Progress Administration, and the National Recovery Administration are among the New Deal's most well-known programs.
The act created a national retirement system, while the WPA created millions of jobs for the unemployed, and the National Recovery Administration helped businesses comply with fair business standards. Roosevelt's government also enacted policies to regulate business and prevent another economic catastrophe, such as the creation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to protect bank deposits, the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate the stock market, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, which established minimum wages and maximum working hours.
However, the Great Depression's effects were still present in 1941, despite Roosevelt's efforts. Unemployment remained high, and the country was on the brink of war. However, the New Deal succeeded in helping to recover the economy and created a framework for future reforms that would help reduce the impact of future financial catastrophes.
The administration of Franklin Roosevelt was successful in addressing the issues of the Great Depression from 1933 to 1941. The president's main objective was to revive the economy and alleviate the effects of the Depression, and he accomplished this in several ways. The New Deal, a series of economic programs that aimed to stimulate the economy, create jobs, and provide economic relief, was implemented by Roosevelt's government.
To know more about The Great Depression refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
How did people respond to the large tax cuts for the wealthy in Reagan's supply-side economic policy?
O Most understood that tax cuts would help in the long run.
O Most opp
O Some supported the 's and some opposed them.
O
The majority had no opinion about it because they didn't think it was a key element of economic recove
the cuts because there weren't similar provisions to help the poor.
1
2
3
4 5 6 7
mm
earnx-svc/getindex/token/641d0ac70897c069e9c3d263_8c33c219-8553-401a-9c70-57a8adf33fcb/conceptld/HST303B_Summit US History_06_17_UT_CG/cond
People respond to the large tax cuts for the wealthy in Reagan's supply-side economic policy through Option 3 which is the most accurate response to this question.
How is it the response?There were both supporters and opponents of Reagan's supply-side economic policy, which included large tax cuts for the wealthy.
Supporters argued that the tax cuts would stimulate economic growth and job creation, while opponents argued that the policy would primarily benefit the rich and exacerbate income inequality.
However, it is worth noting that opinions on the policy were not necessarily divided along clear partisan lines and varied among different segments of society.
learn more about Reagan's supply-side economic policy: https://brainly.com/question/978072
#SPJ1
how did the cold war begin in the first few years after world war ii? be sure to discuss the actions of both sides, including the role played by joseph stalin, harry truman, and winston churchill?
The Cold War began as a result of an ideological and political conflict between the US and the USSR.
The tense alliance between the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union on the one hand, and the latter on the other, started to disintegrate following the surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945.
The development of nuclear weapons, American fears of communism, tensions between the two nations at the end of World War II, ideological rivalry between the US and the Soviet Union, and these developments all contributed to the start of the Cold War.
To know more about world war ii visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13382356
#SPJ4
The French Mandate removed Faisel as King of Greater Syria. What did the British
Mandate in Iraq do for him?
Answer:
The British Mandate in Iraq offered Faisal a position as king of Iraq in 1921. He accepted the offer and served as king until 1933 when he was forced to abdicate in a coup. He then moved to Switzerland where he lived until his death in 1933.
Explanation:
I hope this is correct
according to deloria and lytle, what assumption was inherent in the general allotment (dawes) act?
According to Vine Deloria Jr. and Clifford Lytle in their book American Indians, American Justice, the fundamental assumption of the act was that Native Americans would become "civilized" if given individual land parcels.
The Dawes Act was a United States federal law that was passed in 1887. The act dissolved communal Native American landholding and provided 160-acre individual landholdings to Native American heads of households.
The act was meant to divide up reservations and tribal land to encourage assimilation by forcing Native Americans to adopt farming and owning property as a way of life.
What was the assumption inherent in the General Allotment (Dawes) Act?
According to Deloria and Lytle, the assumption inherent in the General Allotment (Dawes) Act was that Native Americans could become fully assimilated by farming and owning property.
The main goal of the Dawes Act was to provide Native Americans with the opportunity to become independent farmers who could support themselves and their families. The act was a way to force Native Americans to adopt American values and ways of life in the hopes of assimilating them into American society.
The Dawes Act was ultimately unsuccessful because it was based on the false belief that Native Americans could be fully assimilated by farming and owning property. Native Americans faced a variety of challenges that made it difficult for them to succeed as farmers, including poor soil quality and limited access to water.
Additionally, many Native Americans did not want to abandon their traditional ways of life and cultures.
Learn more about Dawes Act here:
brainly.com/question/18338289
#SPJ11