1. the Arms Race resulted in an unprecedented arms buildup on both sides. Both the United States and the Soviet Union developed and tested a wide range of nuclear weapons, including increasingly powerful hydrogen bombs. This led to a dangerous state of tension and the constant threat of a nuclear war, known as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).
2. the Arms Race had a significant impact on international relations during the Cold War. The United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a global struggle for influence, with both sides seeking to expand their spheres of influence and compete for allies. The Arms Race fueled this rivalry, as both sides used their military power as a tool of diplomacy.
3. the Arms Race had significant economic consequences. The United States and the Soviet Union invested heavily in their military industries, with defense spending accounting for a significant portion of their national budgets. This had a major impact on the domestic economies of both countries, as resources were diverted away from other areas of development.
4. the Arms Race ultimately contributed to the end of the Cold War. The United States and the Soviet Union recognized that their military rivalry was unsustainable, and both sides began to engage in arms control negotiations in the 1970s and 1980s. This culminated in the signing of several arms control agreements, including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which helped reduce tensions and pave the way for the end of the Cold War.
What was one of the causes of tensions in Europe that led to World War I?
Answer:
The expansion of European nations as empires (also known as imperialism) can be seen as a key cause of World War I, because as countries like Britain and France expanded their empires, it resulted in increased tensions among European countries.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
MArk me brianliest and good luck! =D
the main racial and cultural mechanism used to organize society hierarchically in colonial spanish and portuguese america was
The principal racial and social component used to coordinate society progressively in pioneer Spanish and Portuguese America was the caste system. option (A) is correct.
Caste is a type of social definition portrayed by endogamy, the genetic transmission of a style of life that frequently incorporates an occupation, custom status in a pecking order, and standard social communication and rejection gave social thoughts of immaculateness and contamination.
The Caste Framework was made in pilgrim times to clear up blended race families for those back in Spain yet this racial pecking order stayed set up long after the Spanish had left Latin America. The Caste Framework was made by the Spanish to keep up with their power and prevalence over other racial gatherings in the settlements.
Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about caste system:
https://brainly.com/question/22047065
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
The main racial and cultural mechanism used to organize society hierarchically in colonial spanish and portuguese america was_______.
(A) caste system
(B) fixed and hierarchical
(C) traditional
(D) inconsistent
What were some of the consequences that occurred after Harding appointed members of the Ohio gang, his friends or political allies?
Answer:
The appointment of members of the "Ohio Gang" by President Warren G. Harding had several consequences, including:
Scandals: The Ohio Gang was involved in a number of scandals during Harding's presidency, including the Teapot Dome scandal, which involved the secret leasing of federal oil reserves to private oil companies in exchange for bribes. Other scandals included the Veterans Bureau scandal and the sale of pardons.
Loss of Public Trust: The scandals surrounding the Ohio Gang eroded public trust in the government and contributed to a general sense of disillusionment with politics and government. Many people felt that the government was corrupt and that politicians were only interested in personal gain.
Damage to Harding's Legacy: The scandals associated with the Ohio Gang tarnished Harding's reputation and legacy. Although Harding was not personally involved in the scandals, he was criticized for his judgment in appointing members of the Ohio Gang to key government positions.
Reform Efforts: The scandals surrounding the Ohio Gang led to calls for reform in government and the establishment of new regulations and oversight mechanisms to prevent corruption and abuse of power. These reforms included the creation of the Bureau of the Budget, which aimed to increase transparency and accountability in government spending.
Overall, the appointment of members of the Ohio Gang had significant negative consequences for Harding's presidency and for the public's perception of government and politics.
Explanation:
see which matches up
who was the elected president of the russian republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991?gorbachevstalinyeltsinkhrushchev
Answer:
Mikhail Gorbachev
Explanation:
Just three days after it began, the coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev collapses. Despite his success in avoiding removal from office, Gorbachev’s days in power were numbered. The Soviet Union would soon cease to exist as a nation and as a Cold War threat to the United States.
.
The elected president of the Russian Republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991 was Boris Yeltsin. Who was Boris Yeltsin?
Boris Yeltsin was a Russian politician who served as the first president of the Russian Federation from 1991 to 1999. He was born in 1931 in Butka, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Soviet Union, and died in 2007 in Moscow, Russia. Yeltsin led Russia's response to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resulting political, economic, and social upheaval.
He became a prominent politician in the late 1980s and played a significant role in the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union. The elected president of the Russian Republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991 was Boris Yeltsin.
To know more about Boris Yeltsin refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/263972#
#SPJ11
the modern state spread throughout the world primarily through a. philosophical treatises by european thinkers. b. colonial dominance imposed by european states. c. increased international commerce and trade. d. a centuries-long process of wars and indigenous development.
The modern state spread throughout the world primarily through colonial dominance imposed by European states.
The correct answer is option B.
Institutions of feudalism and dictatorship were replaced in Europe between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries by the ultramodern state, which ultimately spread to the rest of the world through subjection and colonisation. This contemporary state model's four identifying characteristics are bureaucracy, legality, home, and sovereignty( external and internal).
States use these four characteristics to give their citizens with services similar as a legal system, structure, and security( Drogus & Orvis, 2014). The accord that put an end to the war, known as the Peace of Westphalia, recognised the autonomous sovereign of a state as having power over all aspects of the state, including religion. As a result, the idea of a autonomous state as we know it moment was developed.
Learn more about colonization at
https://brainly.com/question/30690128
#SPJ4
what were the most significant differences in the experiences of women in the post- world war ii era and the cult of domesticity popularized in the 19th century?
Women in the post-World War II era had greater access to education, employment, and political participation, while the cult of domesticity idealized women as homemakers and restricted their opportunities outside the home.
Women's experiences after WWII varied greatly from those of the nineteenth-century domesticity cult. Women were idealised as homemakers and were limited to household duties during the nineteenth century. They had little opportunity for schooling, employment, or civic participation.
Women, on the other hand, had better access to education and employment possibilities after WWII, and their labour-force participation grew considerably. Furthermore, the feminist movement, which advocated for equal rights and chances for women, helped women achieve greater governmental and social influence. These developments assisted major advancements in women's rights and equality.
Learn more about World War II:
https://brainly.com/question/27005787
#SPJ4
How was the cultural upheaval of the 1960s related to the political and social changes of the decade? Is the youth rebellion best seen as a response to immediate events, or as a consequence of such longer-term forces as the population bulge and economic prosperity? What were the long-term results of the counterculture in all its varieties?
The civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, antiwar demonstrations, and countercultural movements defined the time period.
What social and cultural developments are taking place?With the advent of Cold War politics, civil rights movements, student protests, and the Vietnam War, the 1960s saw the emergence of a popular culture in film and music that mirrored and influenced the decade's social changes.
The 1960s were among the most turbulent and polarising decades in human history. During this time, there was the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War and antiwar protests, countercultural movements, political assassinations, and also the creation of the "generation gap.
To know about social development visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30756287
#SPJ1
Only maintaining diplomatic relations with countries that share similar ideologies is called:
A. Dollar diplomacy
B. International diplomacy
C. Moral diplomacy
D. Big stick diplomacy
Only maintaining diplomatic ties with nations that hold like ideology is referred to as:virtuous diplomacy
What does the phrase "big stick diplomacy" mean?The phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far" was the motto of President Theodore Roosevelt, and it is sometimes referred to as "big stick ideology," "big stick diplomacy," or "big stick policy."
What does "dollar diplomacy" mean?Dollar Diplomacy is an international strategy developed by U.S. President William Howard Taft (1909–1913) and his secretary of state, Philander C. Knox, to maintain a region's financial stability while defending and advancing American business and financial interests there.
To know more about Moral diplomacy visit:-
brainly.com/question/27940423
#SPJ1
Answer:
moral diplomacy
Explanation:
Kung ikaw ay nabuhay noon, ano kaya ang maaari mong ginawa sa pagdating
ng mga mananakop? sa kasalukuyang panahon, kung sakali na may mananakop
na dumating sa bansa, ano ang iyong gagawin? at kung sa hinaharap ay may
darating na mananakop, paano mo ito haharapin?
sagot:
noon:____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
kasalukuyan:____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
hinaharap:______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Answer:
i speak english
Explanation:
:)
dos ejemplo de las relaciones entre la civilizacion, sociedad, salvajismo, y clan
Civilization and society are closely related. Civilization is the process of developing a society from a primitive state to a more advanced one.
This process involves the development of rules, laws, and social structures to ensure the security and stability of the group. Society is the group of people living together in a defined territory and sharing a common culture.
Savagery is a term used to describe the behavior of people who live in an uncivilized state. It is characterized by lack of laws and social structures, and often includes violence, cruelty, and chaos. In contrast, clan is a group of people who are related by blood and share a common ancestral lineage. Clans often have distinct customs and beliefs, and in some cases, they may have their own language and culture. Clans typically have strong social bonds that provide a sense of belonging and security.
To know more about civilization, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12207844
#SPJ4
The Question is-
Write two examples of the relationships between civilization, society, savagery, and clan.
Which Spanish-American
War hero in 1898, and
Rough Rider, would become
President of the United
States in 1901?
A. Herbert Hoover
B. William Taft
C. Teddy Roosevelt
D. Woodrow Wilson
C. Teddy Roosevelt Spanish-American War hero in 1898, and Rough Rider, would become President of the United States in 1901.
Which hero of the Spanish-American War would take office as president in 1901?The White House Historical Association is the source of the biographies of President Roosevelt and previous presidents. Theodore Roosevelt, who was not quite 43, became the 26th and youngest president in the history of the country after President William McKinley was assassinated.
Roosevelt abandoned his official post to command the volunteer cavalry known as the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War (1898), a cause for which he had vociferously advocated. The Rough Riders' valor caught the public's imagination and elevated Roosevelt to the status of a war hero.
To know more about Spanish-American War, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9269728
#SPJ1
The midterms are often referred to as a “referendum on the president.” What does this mean?
Answer:In the middle of the term of the executive or of another group of members, the people can elect their representatives in a midterm election
Explanation:
Read the quotation from Barack Obama’s 2016 address to the graduates of Howard University.
If you think that the only way forward is to be as uncompromising as possible, you will feel good about yourself, you will enjoy a certain moral purity, but you’re not going to get what you want.
–President Barack Obama, May 7, 2016
Which statement best summarizes President Obama’s main point?
Compromise is often necessary to bring about change.
People should not compromise if they want to bring about change.
People should not compromise if they want to remain morally pure.
Compromise makes people feel good about themselves and their actions.
please hurryy!!! timed quiz!!!!
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes President Obama's main point is: "Compromise is often necessary to bring about change."
although initially the us attempted neutrality, when the german u-boat sunk the british freighter, lusitania, carrying british war material the us drew closer to war, viewing the act as
Although initially, US attempted neutrality, when the german u-boat sunk the British freighter, Lusitania, carrying British war material the US drew closer to war, viewing the act as a violation.
The German U-boat sank the British freighter Lusitania in the year 1915, which was at that time transporting British war supplies and civilian passengers, causing the US to reconsider its original decision to stay neutral during the first world war. The US saw the incident as a violation, a breach of international law and an attack on defenceless civilians.
More than a hundred Americans were among the twelve hundred individuals who died in the assault. The complete destruction of the Lusitania played a major part in pushing the nation closer to officially joining the conflict, even though the country would not do so until the year 1917. Germans perceived the sinking of the Lusitania as an act of aggression, which increased American anger and resolve to support the Allied cause.
Read more about violation on:
https://brainly.com/question/30039274
#SPJ4
what impact did the end of the war in vietnam in 1975 have on the southeast asian population of california? group of answer choices many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong came to the united states, with california alone receiving 40 percent of these immigrants. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong were already living in california; after the war, many more came to already established communities, creating conflicts between longtime and new residents. many vietnamese who were already here returned home to help rebuild the country. many cambodians and hmong who were already here returned to their countries because the end of the war in vietnam led to the start of wars in neighboring countries.
In California, there were already many Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Hmong residents; nevertheless, following the war, a large influx of new immigrants led to tensions between longtime residents and those who had recently moved in. Hence (a) is the correct option.
In 1975, Communist forces took over South Vietnam, bringing an end to the conflict. The next year, South Vietnam was united as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. It concludes that some of the claims that the Vietnam War strengthened the noncommunist states in Southeast Asia, boosted the region's economic development, and sparked the formation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), all of which made the region more secure and stable, have some basis.
To know more about immigrants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ4
what impact did the end of the war in vietnam in 1975 have on the southeast asian population of california? group of answer choices
a. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong came to the united states, with california alone receiving 40 percent of these immigrants.
b. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong were already living in california; after the war, many more came to already established communities, creating conflicts between longtime and new residents.
c. many vietnamese who were already here returned home to help rebuild the country.
d. many cambodians and hmong who were already here returned to their countries because the end of the war in vietnam led to the start of wars in neighboring countries.
Please help
The Cold War at Home to write two letters (4-5 Sentences each) from two different viewpoints. One is from the perspective of an American describing what has been going on in their life and one is from the perspective of someone from the Communist East (like East Berlin or the Soviet Union).
The Letter from the perspective of an American is given below:
Dear friend,
I wanted to share with you the recent events in my life. The country is currently facing a tense period due to the Cold War. The threat of nuclear war looms over us, and people are constantly living in fear.
The government is conducting extensive surveillance on citizens, and there have been reports of McCarthyism, where people are being accused of being communists without any evidence. I personally know some people who have lost their jobs due to these accusations. The situation is dire, and I hope things get better soon.
Best regards,
[Your name]
Letter from the perspective of someone from Communist East:
Dear comrade,
I hope this letter finds you well. Life in East Berlin has been challenging due to the Cold War. We are constantly being portrayed as the enemy by the West, and there is a sense of isolation. The government controls all aspects of life, and people who criticize the regime are punished severely.
However, the Soviet Union is providing us with support, and we feel that we are not alone. We know that the West is constantly spying on us, but we have to remain vigilant and united. We hope that one day, there will be peace and cooperation between our two countries.
Yours in solidarity,
[Your name]
Read more about the Cold War here:
https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ1
2. Why are the black city officials fighting against this proposed law and what do they see the issues
or problems with this proposed policy?
Answer:
The black city officials in Jackson, Mississippi, are fighting against the proposed Jackson Omnibus Bill for several reasons. One of the primary concerns is that the bill would remove control of the city's water system from local officials and place it in the hands of the state government. This would mean that decisions about the city's water supply and infrastructure would be made by state officials who may not have a good understanding of the needs and priorities of the city's residents.
In addition, the proposed law would create new courts with judges appointed by the state, which some officials argue could undermine the independence of the city's judicial system. There is also concern that the bill could be used to undermine the power of the city's elected officials, particularly the mayor and city council.
Some officials have also raised concerns about the potential for the proposed law to impact the city's black residents disproportionately. Jackson has a majority-black population, and some have argued that the bill could be used to marginalize further and disenfranchise black residents.
Overall, the black city officials in Jackson oppose the proposed law because they believe it could have negative consequences for the city and its residents, particularly those already marginalized or disenfranchised.
many white americans of the eighteenth century viewed native americans as . multiple choice question. cultivated undignified
Answer: undignified
Explanation:
b/c cultivated means like civilized and refined. undignified means uncivilized and dirty, which is what the americans thought
Many white Americans of the eighteenth century viewed Native Americans as "undignified."
In the eighteenth century, white Americans viewed Native Americans as inferior and savage. They were viewed as uncivilized people, and they were forced to abandon their beliefs and culture. The Europeans saw themselves as the superior race and believed they could civilize the Native Americans.
Native Americans were seen as undignified by the whites in the eighteenth century. The whites saw them as people who could not properly live in society, and they believed that they needed to change their way of life to suit the white way of living. They viewed them as people who needed to be educated and taught new skills to be able to survive in the new world.Native Americans were often displaced from their ancestral lands and forced to relocate to new areas. They were subjected to discrimination, prejudice, and racism. Native Americans suffered greatly in the eighteenth century due to the actions of the whites who were determined to impose their way of life on them.The treatment of Native Americans during the eighteenth century was unfair and unjust.
They were not given the same rights as the whites, and they were not respected as people. It was not until much later that Native Americans were recognized for their contributions to society, and their culture was respected and valued by Americans.
Know more about Native americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ11
What did Adam Smith believe about self-interest and government regulation of the economy? A. He believed people should be allowed to pursue their own self-interest because it was necessary to support mercantilist economies. B. He believed governments should regulate people's economic activities to limit the harm caused by the industrialization of the economy. C. He believed governments should regulate people's economic activities to ensure that all people benefited from economic growth. D. He believed people should be allowed to pursue their own self-interest because doing so would create a collective benefit for the economy.
Answer: the ansewr is c
Explanation:
it says c
I am submitting to Congress the Ethics in Government Act of 1977. This bill will establish far-reaching safeguards against conflicts of interest and abuse of the public trust by government officials.... In addition... I am today announcing support for legislation to authorize appointment of a temporary Special Prosecutor to handle cases of misconduct by high-ranking Executive Branch officials. -President Jimmy Carter, message to Congress, May 3, 1977 Which situation prompted President Carter to propose this legislation to Congress? Military opinion regarding troop reductions in the Vietnam War Political pressure regarding government negotiations in the Iran hostage crisis International criticism regarding nuclear arms during the Cold War Public cynicism regarding government corruption after the Watergate scandal
Option (d), Following the Watergate crisis, public skepticism about governmental corruption led President Carter to present this measure to Congress.
What situation prompted President Carter to recommend the 1977 Ethics in Government Act to Congress?The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was enacted in the United States as a result of the Nixon Watergate scandal and the Saturday Night Massacre.
What led to the political scandal known as "Watergate"?The theft that sparked the controversy took place at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C., which was named after the "Water Gate" area where symphony orchestra performances were staged on the Potomac River between 1935 and 1965. The facility bore the name of the controversy.
What effects did the Watergate scandal have on the presidency? It was what?With the aid of White House employees, the Democratic National Committee offices in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C., were broken into. Due to the White House's involvement in the break-in and subsequent cover-up, President Nixon was forced to resign in 1974 in order to avoid being impeached.
Learn more about Ethics in Government Act of 1978: https://brainly.com/question/30692685
#SPJ1
Pls help 30 points
Which of the following is true of the Washington constitutional amendment process but not true of the U.S. constitutional amendment process?
A. Washington does not require a popular vote to approve amendments, while the U.S. does.
B. Washington requires one legislative chamber to approve amendments, while the U.S. requires both.
C. Washington requires a popular vote to approve amendments, while the U.S. does not.
D. Washington requires both legislative chambers to approve amendments, while the U.S. does not.
the mortality depicted in the image most directly contributed to which of the following changes in europe in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries? responses the end of feudalism the end of feudalism the decline of serfdom the decline of serfdom the collapse of the byzantine empire the collapse of the byzantine empire the protestant reformation
The mortality depicted in the image most directly contributed to the decline of serfdom in Europe in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.
What is mortality?Mortality is a term used to describe the occurrence of death in a population. Mortality rate is used to describe the number of deaths per unit of population over a specific period of time, usually expressed as a percentage. In the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, Europe was hit by a series of outbreaks of the bubonic plague, also known as the Black Death. This disease caused a significant decrease in population in many areas, with mortality rates as high as 60%.
Due to the significant decrease in population, there was a decrease in labor supply, which led to a decline in serfdom. Serfs, who were bound to their land and lords, lost their value, as lords began to compete with each other to retain laborers, and serfs had more bargaining power. This led to the decline of serfdom in Europe, and the rise of more free labor.
See more about mortality in:
https://brainly.com/question/30774820
#SPJ11
What did the Cherokee peoples receive under the Treaty of Echota
Answer: It resulted in the forced removal of thousands of Cherokee from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in what became known as the Trail of Tears.
Explanation:
The Treaty of Echota was signed on December 29, 1835, between the United States government and a minority faction of the Cherokee Nation. The treaty was controversial because it was signed without the consent of the majority of the Cherokee people, and it resulted in the forced removal of thousands of Cherokee from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in what became known as the Trail of Tears.
Under the terms of the Treaty of Echota, the Cherokee people ceded all their lands east of the Mississippi River to the United States government in exchange for compensation of $5 million and land in Indian Territory. The treaty also provided for the establishment of a Cherokee Nation government in Indian Territory and guaranteed the Cherokee people the right to self-government and protection of their property rights.
However, many Cherokee leaders, including Principal Chief John Ross, opposed the treaty and argued that it was not valid because it was signed without the consent of the majority of the Cherokee people. The U.S. government disregarded these objections and used the treaty to justify the forced removal of the Cherokee people from their homes in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory.
What does the speech reveal about what might lie ahead for the American people?
Answer: the soviets might try to spread communism to even America and make it even more difficult for them to keep the world safe for democracy.
Explanation:
What is the author suggesting about Artemisia in this passage when Xerxes calls her for a consultation?
The next question Xerxes poses is whether he's going to stay or go home.
When asked a second time, what counsel did Artemisia offer Xerxes?In order for the Great King to easily put the responsibility at someone else's shoes if things go wrong, Artemisia encourages him to send Mardonius to handle the war and go home.
Xerxes was amazed by her fortitude and bravery, commenting that "My men are becoming women, but my women, men." Nobody on the Calypso ship survived. Xerxes halted his assault on Greece after the battle of Salamis, and Artemisia is attributed with convincing him to do so.
To know more about Xerxes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14679361
#SPJ9
Help.
I have to write an article so can someone give me a few writing methods I can use because I dont know where to start. Like dont write it for me, just tell me a few ways/examples I can start it or like introduce a topic.
Sure, here are some writing methods you can use to start your article:
Start with a personal anecdote or story related to your topic. This can help draw the reader in and make them more interested in what you have to say.
Use a provocative or surprising fact or statistic related to your topic to grab the reader's attention.
Start with a question related to your topic that will pique the reader's curiosity and make them want to keep reading to find the answer.
Begin with a quote from a well-known person or source that relates to your topic.
Start with a definition or explanation of a key term or concept related to your topic.
Remember, the introduction is important as it sets the tone for the rest of the article, so try to choose a method that is relevant and engaging for your topic. Good luck with your article!
why were american diplomats particularly dismayed that the soviets had installed a procommunist government in poland in 1945?
American diplomats were particularly dismayed that the Soviets had installed a pro-communist government in Poland in 1945 because they feared it would lead to the spread of communism throughout Eastern Europe. This was a direct threat to the United States' interests and its goal of containing communism during the Cold War.
Additionally, the United States had a long history of supporting democratic governments and human rights, and the installation of a pro-communist government in Poland went against these values.The United States was also concerned about the Soviet Union's aggressive actions in Eastern Europe and their desire to expand their sphere of influence.
The installation of a pro-communist government in Poland was seen as a clear indication of the Soviet Union's intentions to spread communism throughout the region. This was seen as a direct threat to the national security interests of the United States, and American diplomats were determined to stop the spread of communism at all costs.
The installation of a pro-communist government in Poland also had practical implications for the United States. Poland was a key strategic location for the Soviet Union, as it provided access to the rest of Europe.
The United States was concerned that the Soviet Union would use Poland as a base to launch further attacks against other countries in the region. American diplomats were determined to prevent this from happening and worked to contain Soviet influence in Eastern Europe.
To know more about cold war refer here: https://brainly.com/question/2765211#
#SPJ11
Which sentences from Frederick Douglass' speech, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?, show the separation between him and his audience and prove that he does not share his listeners' attitudes toward the Fourth of July?
Place the passage here with the hot texts highlighted in yellow Only the correct answer(s) should be highlighted in green. The papers and placards say, that l am to delıver a 4th [of] July oration. This certainly sounds large, and out of the common way, for it is true that I have often had the privilege to speak in this beautiful Hall, and to address many who now honor me with their presence. But neither their familiar faces, nor the perfect gage I think I have of Corinthian Hall, seems to free me from embarrassment. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this platform and the slave plantation, from which lescaped, is considerable and the difficulties to be overcome in getting from the latter to the former, are by no means slight. That I am here to-day is, to me, a matter of astonishment as well as of gratitude. You will not, therefore, be surprised, if in what I have to say l evince no elaborate preparation, nor grace my speech with any high sounding exordium With little experience and with less learning, I have been able to throw my thoughts hastily and imperfectly together; and trusting to your patient and generous indulgence, I will proceed to lay them before you. This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God. It carries your minds back to the day, and to the act of your great deliverance; and to the signs, and to the wonders, associated with that act, and that day. This celebration also marks the beginning of another year of your national life; and reminds you that the Republic of America is now 76 years old. I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young. Seventy-six years, though a good old age for a man, is but a mere speck in the life of a nation. Three score years and ten is the allotted time for individual men; but nations number their years by thousands. Accordıng to this fact, you are, even now, only in -Frederick Douglass from "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?"
Answer ASAP please!
Answer:
The sentences that show the separation between Frederick Douglass and his audience and prove that he does not share his listeners' attitudes toward the Fourth of July are:
- "This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God."
- "I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young. Seventy-six years, though a good old age for a man, is but a mere speck in the life of a nation."
List and explain three reasons the French philosophes admired Qing China.
The French philosophes, a group of intellectuals in 18th-century France, admired Qing China for several reasons:Political organization: The Qing dynasty had a highly centralized and bureaucratic political system, which was considered efficient and well-organized by the philosophes.
They saw this as a model for a new kind of government, free from the aristocratic privilege and corruption of the ancien regime in France.Cultural heritage: The Chinese were considered to have a rich and ancient civilization, which the philosophes admired. They saw Chinese culture as having great moral and ethical values, which they thought were superior to the decadence and moral corruption of European societies.Economic development: The Qing dynasty was seen as having made great strides in economic development, including the creation of a market economy and the growth of trade and commerce. The philosophes saw this as an example of how a strong and centralized government could promote economic growth and development. the French philosophes admired Qing China for its strong and efficient government, rich cultural heritage, and economic development, and saw it as a model for political and social reform in Europe.
To learn more about dynasty click the link below:
brainly.com/question/30744152
#SPJ1
Did the New Deal effectively provide relief to Americans during the Great Depression? Historians and economists still disagree over the answer to this question. Read the four articles provided here to learn more about both sides of the argument. Determine your viewpoint on this topic and develop a claim.
Write an essay to present an argument that either accepts or rejects the claim that the New Deal effectively provided relief during the Great Depression. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and accurate data and other relevant evidence. It should also include, and rebut, a counterclaim.
the source to reed is the one in the link bellow
Here is your essay.
The New Deal, a series of economic programs and reforms implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, remains a controversial topic among historians and economists. Some argue that it effectively provided relief to Americans, while others maintain that it failed to bring about significant change. After careful consideration of both sides of the argument, I firmly believe that the New Deal was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression.
Those who argue that the New Deal was effective in providing relief point to several programs that significantly impacted Americans. For instance, the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) provided employment for thousands of unemployed men who worked on projects such as reforestation and soil conservation. The Works Progress Administration (WPA) provided employment for millions of Americans who worked on various public works projects, including roads, bridges, and schools. Additionally, the Social Security Act provided a safety net for the elderly and disabled, which greatly improved the quality of life for those who previously had little or no support.
Furthermore, the New Deal stimulated economic growth, which led to a decrease in unemployment rates. The National Recovery Administration (NRA) established codes for fair competition, which stabilized prices and wages and led to increased production. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) provided electricity to rural areas, which spurred economic development in those regions. These programs, among others, helped to boost the economy and provide relief to those who were struggling.
However, those who argue against the effectiveness of the New Deal point out that the unemployment rate remained high throughout the 1930s. They also argue that some programs, such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), had negative consequences. The AAA paid farmers to decrease production, which led to higher food prices and caused hardship for many Americans.
Despite these criticisms, I believe that the New Deal was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression. While the unemployment rate remained high, the New Deal helped to stabilize the economy and provide employment opportunities for millions of Americans. Additionally, the New Deal brought about lasting reforms, such as Social Security, that continue to benefit Americans today. While some programs had negative consequences, overall, the New Deal was a positive step towards recovery.
In conclusion, while historians and economists continue to debate the effectiveness of the New Deal, I firmly believe that it was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression. The New Deal programs provided employment opportunities, stimulated economic growth, and brought about lasting reforms that continue to benefit Americans today. While there were some negative consequences, overall, the New Deal was a necessary and effective response to a devastating economic crisis.