The right to govern or rule or determine is inherent in the concept of sovereignty.
The right to govern or rule or determine can be described as the power of sovereignty. Sovereignty refers to the supreme authority and control over a territory or a political entity. It encompasses the ability to make decisions, establish laws, enforce regulations, and exercise control over the internal and external affairs of a nation or governing body. The power of sovereignty is typically vested in the government or ruling body of a country, allowing them to exercise their authority and make decisions that affect the welfare and functioning of the state and its citizens.In conclusion, the right to govern, rule, or determine is a fundamental aspect of sovereignty, providing the authority and decision-making power necessary for the effective governance of a nation or political entity.
For more questions on right to govern:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ8
In which country did fascism start, and who was the leader that started
that style of government?
Answer: It started in Italy and the leader that started it was Benito Mussolini.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
What classes did Karl Marx refer to in the Communist Manifesto? How were they different?
Answer:
The Manifesto describes how capitalism divides society into two classes: the bourgeoisie, or capitalists who own these means of production (factories, mills, mines, etc.), and the workers, who sell their labor power to the capitalists, who pay the workers as little as they can get away with.
__ vastly expanded Persian territories, establishing the___, which was the largest the world had ever seen.
Answer: Cyrus the Great; Persian empire
Explanation: Cyrus the Great vastly expanded Persian territories, establishing the Persian Empire, which was the largest the world had ever seen.
What do both Clovis and Charlemagne have in common?
Answer: Clovis and Charlemagne were both King of Franks who used christianity as a way to superior their kingdoms. Both men fulfilled their idea of using Christianity.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Clovis and Charlemagne, both historical leaders, were instrumental in the development and progression of France by uniting and expanding the Frankish tribes.
Explanation:Both Clovis and Charlemagne are important figures in the history of France. Clovis was the first King of the Franks to unite all the Frankish tribes under one ruler, laying the groundwork for the country we know as France today. Similarly, Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, was the King of the Franks who expanded the Frankish kingdom, eventually becoming the Emperor of the Romans. This established what became known as the Carolingian Empire, which included parts of present-day France, Germany and Italy. Hence, both leaders share the commonality of greatly advancing the progression and development of France.
Learn more about French History https://brainly.com/question/31619670#SPJ11
How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the New England and souther colonies
Answer:
Most of the people in the middle colonies were Puritan
Puritan means: a member of a group of English Protestants of the late 16th and 17th centuries who regarded the Reformation of the Church of England under Elizabeth as incomplete and sought to simplify and regulate forms of worship.
Hope this helps:)
Answer: New England had skilled craftsmen in the industry of shipbuilding. The Mid-Atlantic presented a diverse workforce of farmers, fisherman, and merchants. The Southern Colonies were primarily agricultural with few cities and limited schools.
Explanation:↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Which statement best describes why James Cox lost the 1920 presidential
election to Warren Harding by a wide margin?
Answer:
Cox opposed the United States' membership in the League of. Nations
Explanation:
The Great Plains are part of a
of rainfall each year and have very few trees.
OA grassland
OB. temperate forest
OC. desert
OD chaparral
ecosystem. They receive 20 to 35 inches
A
Answer: A
Explanation: The Northern Great Plains spans more than 180 million acres and crosses five U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. As large as California and Nevada combined, this short- and mixed-grass prairie is one of only four remaining intact temperate grasslands in the world.
YIPPPEE
You have reached a final decision: you are going to create a new lunch program that will include healthier foods.
List one benefit and one cost of the new lunch program
The participants in Washington's Constitutional Convention worked to..
Answer:
The participants in Washington's Constitutional Convention worked to create a document that would serve as a framework for the laws, government, and fundamental principles of the United States of America. They sought to provide the nation with an effective and unified system of government to replace the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
Question
Which statements about West African kingdoms of the 1300s and 1400s are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Responses
The rainforest of Africa supports grasses and other plants and birds, but its soil is too wet for the roots of tall trees.
The kingdom of Benin was known for its skilled brass makers and well-organized capital.
Sunni Ali, ruler of Songhai, conquered Mali and destroyed the city of Timbuktu.
Benin was located in the Savanna and relied on the large animals found there for food.
Answer:
-The kingdom of Benin was known for its skilled brass makers and well-organized capital.
-Sunni Ali, ruler of Songhai, conquered Mali and destroyed the city of Timbuktu.
Explanation:
Can anyone help with this?
Answer:
B. Many Pakistanis criticized their government for helping Western powers in the struggle against militant Islam.
Explanation:
Pakistans role in the fight against terrorism raise dad tension in the country because many Pakistanis criticized their government for helping Western powers in the struggle against militant Islam.
Hope this helps!
Why do you think John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism?
Answer: John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he believed that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil.
Explanation: John of Leiden was a Dutch Anabaptist leader who moved to Münster in 1533 and became an influential prophet. He turned the city into a millenarian Anabaptist theocracy and proclaimed himself King of New Jerusalem in 1534. He was captured and executed by the Catholic forces in 1536.
Anabaptists were a radical branch of the Protestant Reformation that rejected infant baptism and practiced adult baptism instead. They held that infants were not punishable for sin because they had no awareness of good and evil and thus could not yet exercise free will, repent, and accept baptism. They also believed that baptism was a sign of commitment to a new life in Christ and a covenant with the community of believers.
John of Leiden shared these Anabaptist views on baptism and applied them to his rule in Münster. He denied the validity of infant baptism and accepted only adult baptism, which he regarded as a second baptism for those who had been baptized as infants by other churches. He also made baptism a requirement for citizenship in his kingdom and enforced it by confiscating the property of those who refused. He saw baptism as a way of purifying the city from sin and preparing it for the imminent return of Christ.
Therefore, John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he followed the Anabaptist doctrine that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil. He also used baptism as a tool of social control and religious conformity in his kingdom.
Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
Why did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries?
Answer:
Explanation:
Hitler most likely believed that Germany had a right to invade other countries because he believed that the Treaty of Versailles did not mention that Germany could not invade other countries.He embraced the concept nationalism and had a superiority complex, believing that the German race was far superior than the rest
why was Washington industries able to transition easily from WW2 to the cold war
Answer:
It seems like you're referring to the industries in Washington state and their ability to transition from World War II to the Cold War era. Several factors contributed to this relatively smooth transition:
1. Defense industry: Washington state was home to a strong defense industry, with companies such as Boeing leading the way in aircraft production. This industry continued to thrive during the Cold War due to the ongoing demand for military aircraft and technology.
2. Aerospace and technology advancements: The Cold War era saw a significant focus on space exploration and the development of advanced technologies. Washington's existing aerospace industry, led by Boeing, played a crucial role in this shift, as they were already involved in producing aircraft for military and civilian purposes.
3.Skilled workforce: During World War II, Washington's industries attracted a skilled workforce that included engineers, scientists, and technicians. This pool of talent helped drive innovation and allowed the state to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving technological landscape of the Cold War era.
4.Government investment: The federal government invested heavily in research and development during the Cold War, and many of these funds were channeled into Washington's industries. This investment helped to further advance the state's technological capabilities and maintain its position as a leader in aerospace and defense.
5.Geographic location: Washington state's location on the West Coast of the United States made it an ideal hub for defense and aerospace activities. Its proximity to the Pacific Ocean allowed for easy access to key military installations and strategic partners in the Asia-Pacific region.
These factors combined to help Washington industries transition smoothly from World War II to the Cold War era, allowing them to adapt and thrive in the changing geopolitical and technological landscape.
Explanation:
Brainlist please?
What were some of the economic effects of World War II? Choose two correct answers.
Cities, industries, and infrastructure were destroyed.
The USSR provided economic relief.
Public transportation was improved.
Businesses were unharmed.
Farms were ruined
Answer:
Businesses were unharmed.
Cities, industries, and infrastructure were destroyed.
Explanation:
Who was responsible for civil rights
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964—legislation initiated by President John F. Kennedy before his assassination—into law on July 2 of that year. King and other civil rights activists witnessed the signing.
Answer: President Lyndon Johnson
Despite Kennedy's assassination in November of 1963, his proposal culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Lyndon Johnson signed it into law just a few hours after it was passed by Congress on July 2, 1964.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Which idea applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale?
A.
Courts should be involved in matters of voting rights.
B.
Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
C.
Only the federal government can establish voting laws.
D.
Religious services in schools violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer: B. Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause
Explanation: The idea that applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale is that prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
1.1 OBITUARY You cousin passed away due to COVID 19. You as an elder sibling you were asked to write an obituary about the cousin to be read during his/her funeral.
As an elder sibling, you have been entrusted with the responsibility of writing an obituary for your cousin who passed away from COVID-19. It will be read during their funeral to honor their life and memory.
Here are the Steps to be followed:
Step 1: Gather Information
Begin by gathering the necessary information about your cousin. This may include their full name, date of birth, date of death, family background, education, career, hobbies, achievements, and any significant events or contributions in their life. Talk to other family members and friends to ensure you have accurate and complete information.
Step 2: Structure the Obituary
An obituary typically follows a specific structure. Start with a concise and respectful introduction, stating your cousin's full name, age, and the fact that they passed away due to COVID-19. Then, provide a brief overview of their life, highlighting their accomplishments, passions, and important relationships. You can mention their education, career, interests, and any community or volunteer work they were involved in. Include details about their immediate family members and close friends.
Step 3: Personalize and Share Memories
Make the obituary personal by sharing anecdotes, memories, or special moments you had with your cousin. This adds a heartfelt touch and helps the readers connect with their personalities. Reflect on their qualities, character, and the impact they had on others' lives. It's essential to maintain a respectful and compassionate tone throughout.
Step 4: Proofread and Finalize
Review the obituary for any errors or inconsistencies. Ensure that the details are accurate, and the language used is appropriate for the solemn occasion. Share the draft with other family members for their input and make any necessary revisions. Once you're satisfied with the final version, you can print copies to be read aloud during the funeral or share them with others digitally as a tribute to your cousin's life.
Remember, writing an obituary is a deeply personal and emotional task. Take your time, be compassionate, and create a heartfelt tribute that honors your cousin's memory.
Know more about obituary here:
https://brainly.com/question/17801108
#SPJ8
Which descriptions of the Ottoman Empire are accurate?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Responses
founded by Osman in the thirteenth century
expanded through Africa and Asia but could not successfully invade Europe
experienced frequent conflict with Safavid Shi'ites as Sunni Muslims
included territory that is now part of Turkey, Greece, and Egypt at its height
had a brief moment of glory before being conquered by Mongols
Answer:
The correct descriptions of the Ottoman Empire are:
Founded by Osman in the thirteenth century Experienced frequent conflict with Safavid Shi'ites as Sunni Muslims Included territory that is now part of Turkey, Greece, and Egypt at its heightOberon wanted to get back the boy he got from a servant woman. Titania won't allow Oberon to get the boy back that's why he decided to cast a spell on her.
The scenario you mentioned refers to a storyline from William Shakespeare's play "A Midsummer Night's Dream." In the play, Oberon, the king of the fairies, and Titania, the queen of the fairies, are in a conflict over the possession of a young boy.
Oberon wants to obtain the boy because he serves as a page to Titania. The boy was initially under the care of a servant woman who passed away, and Titania, out of compassion, adopted him. However, Oberon desires the boy for his own service and insists that Titania hand him over.
When Titania refuses to give up the boy, Oberon becomes frustrated and decides to cast a spell on her. He orders his mischievous servant, Puck, to retrieve a magical flower whose juice, when applied to someone's eyes, causes that person to fall in love with the first creature they see upon awakening.
Oberon plans to use the flower's juice to make Titania fall in love with some kind of grotesque creature, thereby distracting her and weakening her resolve to keep the boy. By casting this spell, Oberon hopes to manipulate Titania's emotions and force her to surrender the boy to him.
For such more question on Midsummer:
https://brainly.com/question/30322703
#SPJ8
Survey of US History Detailed answer
Enormous transformations occurred in the Reconstruction South and in the era of the so-called Wild West. Focus on several groups affected by the changes in these regions and what were their similarities and differences regarding treatment by the United States?
Answer:
The Reconstruction South and the era of the Wild West were both periods of significant change in American history, marked by enormous transformations in society, politics, and culture. These changes affected various groups in different ways, and there were both similarities and differences in how these groups were treated by the United States.
During the Reconstruction South, which followed the Civil War, several groups were affected by the changes in the region. African Americans were granted citizenship and the right to vote by the 14th and 15th Amendments, and African American men were elected to political office in large numbers during this period. However, these gains were short-lived, as white supremacists in the South used violence and intimidation to prevent African Americans from exercising their rights. The rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups led to a reign of terror in many parts of the South, and the federal government was unable or unwilling to provide adequate protection to African Americans. As a result, many African Americans were forced to flee the South in search of safety and opportunity elsewhere.
Another group affected by the changes in the Reconstruction South were poor white farmers, who were often left out of the political process and suffered from economic hardship. The federal government attempted to address this issue through the Homestead Act of 1862, which provided land to settlers in the West, but many poor white farmers in the South were unable to take advantage of this opportunity due to lack of resources or discrimination.
In the era of the Wild West, which coincided with the late 19th century, several groups were affected by the changes in the region. Native Americans were among the most affected, as their lands and resources were taken by white settlers and the federal government. The policy of Indian removal, which had begun in the 1830s, continued in the West, with Native Americans being forced onto reservations and subjected to violence and exploitation. The federal government also attempted to assimilate Native Americans into white American culture through programs like the Indian Boarding Schools, which were often abusive and traumatizing.
Another group affected by the changes in the Wild West were Mexican Americans, who had long been a presence in the region but were often discriminated against by white settlers and the government. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the Mexican-American War in 1848, had guaranteed the rights of Mexican Americans in the West, but these rights were often ignored or violated. Mexican Americans were subjected to discrimination in housing, education, and employment, and were often denied the right to vote or hold political office.
In both the Reconstruction South and the era of the Wild West, marginalized groups faced significant challenges and obstacles in their quest for equality and justice. While some gains were made, violence, discrimination, and exploitation were all too common, and the United States often failed to live up to its ideals of freedom and democracy. It was not until much later, through the Civil Rights Movement and other social justice movements, that many of these injustices were fully addressed and overcome.
Which phrase best completes this diagram?
The Virginia
Plan for the
federal
government
?
Favored by
larger states
A. Established the executive branch as superior to the legislative and
judicial branches
B. Was particularly advantageous to southern states
C. Called for each state's representation in Congress to be based on
population size dy
D. Created a unicameral, or one-house, Congress
Answer:
The correct option is C
Explanation:
Called for each state's representation in Congress to be based on population size.
Question 1 of 10 Read the passage below from the Christian gospel of Matthew. Which of the following scenarios describes a Muslim following one of the pillars of Islam exemplified in the passage?
A Muslim donates part of his salary to a charity out of respect for Islam's third pillar. (Option C)
How is this so?The passage from the Christian gospel of Matthew emphasizes the importance of giving to the needy in secret,without seeking recognition or praise from others.
This aligns with the concept of "Zakat" in Islam, which is the third pillar of the faith. Zakatrequires Muslims to give a portion of their wealth to those in need, with the intention of seeking Allah's reward rather than worldly recognition.
Learn more about Muslim at:
https://brainly.com/question/1214743
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
Read the passage below from the Christian gospel of Matthew. Which of the following scenarios describes a Muslim following one of the pillars of Islam exemplified in the passage?
So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
—Matthew 6:2-4
A. A Muslim takes a trip to Mecca out of respect for Islam's fifth pillar.
B. A Muslim prays five times a day out of respect for Islam's second pillar.
C. A Muslim donates part of his salary to a charity out of respect for Islam's third pillar.
D. A Muslim refuses to eat during the holy month of Ramadan out of respect for Islam's fourth pillar.
Write an essay of at least two hundred words and include examples (evidence) like specific people, places or things. Please cite your sources in either MLA, APA, or Chicago Citation. Race and Culture in Popular Music Items to Consider: In what ways do race and cultural identity play a role in popular music history?
Race and cultural identity have played a significant role in shaping the history of popular music. Throughout the years, various genres and musical styles have emerged as reflections of different racial and cultural experiences, and have influenced and been influenced by the socio-political climate of their time.
From the roots of jazz and blues, which evolved from the African American experience of slavery and oppression, to the rise of hip-hop as a form of cultural expression for African American and Latino communities, popular music has served as a powerful tool for artists to explore and convey their racial and cultural identities.
Additionally, popular music has also been instrumental in breaking down racial barriers and fostering cross-cultural collaborations, as seen in instances where artists from different backgrounds come together to create music that transcends borders and promotes cultural understanding.
Race and cultural identity have played a significant role in the development and evolution of popular music. One example of this is the emergence of jazz and blues in the early 20th century, which originated from the African American experience of slavery and racial segregation.
Artists like Louis Armstrong, Bessie Smith, and Duke Ellington used their music to express their struggles and triumphs, giving voice to the African American community and capturing the attention of audiences worldwide.
Hip-hop, another genre deeply rooted in race and cultural identity, emerged in the 1970s as a form of artistic expression for African American and Latino communities in the Bronx, New York.
Artists such as Grandmaster Flash, Run-D.M.C., and Public Enemy used their music to address issues of systemic racism, social inequality, and urban life, providing a platform for marginalized voices and shedding light on the realities faced by minority communities.
Furthermore, popular music has facilitated cross-cultural collaborations and promoted cultural understanding. Artists like Paul Simon, who incorporated African rhythms and melodies in his album "Graceland," or Carlos Santana, who blended rock and Latin American influences, have bridged cultural divides and brought different musical traditions together.
Learn more about racial segregation here :
https://brainly.com/question/26767920
#SPJ11
Since 1871, what has happened to the share of Canada's population residing in Ontario and Québec? It has remained constant.
It has increased to almost 90 per cent. It has decreased to around 60 per cent.
It has decreased to just less than 40 per cent.
The share of Canada's population residing in Ontario and Quebec has decreased significantly since 1871.
The answer is C.
This is largely due to the provinces' decreasing birthrates and internal migration of Canadians to other regions of the country. In 1871, the two provinces accounted for close to 80 per cent of Canada's total population. Since then, Ontario and Quebec have seen substantial decreases in their overall population due to shifting migration patterns, largely due to the economic opportunities that other regions, such as Prairie provinces, have been able to provide.
Today, the share of Canada's population residing in Ontario and Quebec has decreased to just less than 40 per cent. This decrease is a result of sustained population growth in all other regions of the country, except for the Atlantic provinces. This decrease highlights the changing landscape of Canada as people have sought out new opportunities in other parts of the country in the over 150 years since Confederation.
To know more about Canada's population, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14113223
#SPJ4
Voting in elections influences the U.S. government by:
A. spread lies about a politician.
B. threaten to burn down a building.
C. hire a lawyer to represent them in court.
D. publish criticism of the government.
The following passage is from The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848.
“Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians [workers] have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!”
Which best explains what Marx hoped to get across?
Workers are slaves and should be inspired to revolt.
Workers should unite in the communist movement.
Workers should scare rulers into giving up their wealth.
Workers must be asked to incite a revolution against the rich.
Marx hoped to get across is: Workers should unite in the communist movement.
In the quoted passage from The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx expresses his hope for the unity of the working class in the communist movement. Marx believed that the ruling classes, or bourgeoisie, held economic and political power over the proletariat, the working class. He saw this class division as inherently exploitative, with the bourgeoisie benefiting from the labor of the proletariat.Marx's statement is a call to action for the workers, encouraging them to recognize their collective power and to come together in solidarity. By emphasizing that the proletarians have "nothing to lose but their chains," Marx implies that workers are currently oppressed and alienated by the capitalist system. He suggests that through unity and revolution, they can free themselves from this oppression and work towards building a new world.Marx's ultimate goal was the establishment of a communist society where class distinctions and the exploitation of labor would be eliminated. By urging the working men of all countries to unite, Marx sought to mobilize the working class to challenge the existing social and economic order and to strive for a society based on principles of equality and shared ownership of resources.It is important to note that while the passage highlights Marx's call for workers' unity, understanding his broader ideas and the historical context in which they were written is necessary for a comprehensive interpretation of his work.The correct option is: Workers should unite in the communist movement.
For more such questions on communist movement.
https://brainly.com/question/3055516
#SPJ8
the women's rights movement fractured along racial lines because?
The women's rights movement fractured along racial lines primarily due to differing experiences and priorities shaped by the intersecting dynamics of race, gender, and class.
The mainstream women's suffrage movement in the United States was predominantly led by white women who focused primarily on securing voting rights for themselves.Women of color, particularly Black women, faced additional layers of discrimination and oppression stemming from racial inequality.The experiences of women of color, including the harsh realities of racism and segregation, led them to advocate for broader social justice issues beyond suffrage alone. They recognized that the fight for gender equality must also address the systemic racism and racial violence faced by communities of color.The mainstream suffrage movement often marginalized or excluded women of color, reinforcing racial divisions within the broader struggle for women's rights. The emphasis on a single-issue agenda and the prioritization of the concerns of white women created a division and limited the ability to build a united front.The fracturing of the women's rights movement along racial lines highlights the importance of intersectionality in understanding social justice movements. It underscores the need for recognizing and addressing the distinct experiences and challenges faced by different groups of women based on their racial identities, in order to foster a more inclusive and comprehensive movement for gender equality.For more such questions on women's rights movement
https://brainly.com/question/14986743
#SPJ8
What is common complaint among protesters?
Answer:
Explanation:
Protesters may have various complaints depending on the specific context and issues they are advocating for. However, there are a few common complaints that often emerge among protesters:
1. Injustice and Inequality: Many protesters voice their concerns about perceived injustices and inequalities within society. This can include issues related to social, economic, racial, or gender inequality, as well as grievances against systems or institutions that they believe perpetuate unfairness.
2. Human Rights Violations: Protesters often raise concerns about human rights violations, both domestically and internationally. This can involve advocating for civil liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and opposing actions or policies that they believe infringe upon these rights.
3. Government Actions and Policies: Protesters frequently voice their opposition to specific government actions or policies that they perceive as detrimental to the public interest or contrary to their values. This can range from protesting against specific laws, government decisions, or controversial policies, such as those related to healthcare, education, immigration, or the environment.
4. Police Brutality and Misconduct: Protests against police brutality and misconduct are widespread and highlight concerns over excessive use of force, racial profiling, and systemic issues within law enforcement agencies. Such protests often call for police reform and accountability measures.
5. Environmental Issues: Many protests focus on environmental concerns, such as climate change, deforestation, pollution, or unsustainable practices. Activists often advocate for stronger environmental regulations, renewable energy, conservation efforts, and sustainable development.
6. War and Conflict: Demonstrations against wars, military interventions, and conflicts are another common complaint among protesters. These protests may express opposition to specific military actions, advocate for peaceful resolutions, or demand an end to armed conflicts.
It's important to note that the specific complaints can vary significantly depending on the social, political, and cultural context in which protests occur. Protest movements are driven by a wide range of grievances, and the above examples provide a general overview of common concerns raised by protesters worldwide.
laws that were unable to change after the apartheid laws in 1994
Certain laws, such as the Group Areas Act, Land Act, and Bantu Education Act, remained unchanged after apartheid in 1994.
Following the abolition of apartheid laws in 1994, several laws remained unchanged despite the collective efforts to bring about comprehensive change in South Africa. One such law was the Group Areas Act, which enforced racial segregation and restricted non-white individuals from residing in designated white areas. Despite its discriminatory nature, the Group Areas Act was not immediately repealed, resulting in continued spatial segregation and limited housing opportunities for marginalized communities.Another law that persisted was the Land Act, which allocated land ownership predominantly to white individuals and limited land access for non-white populations. This perpetuated unequal distribution of land and hindered the process of land reform and redistribution.Additionally, aspects of the Bantu Education Act remained unchanged, contributing to educational disparities among different racial groups. The Act, which enforced separate and inferior education for non-white students, had long-lasting effects on educational opportunities and quality.These laws, among others, demonstrated the challenges faced in dismantling the systemic legacies of apartheid and the complexities involved in transforming the legal framework to ensure equality and justice for all South Africans.The complete question should be Which laws remained unchanged after the apartheid laws in 1994, despite the efforts to bring about change?For more questions on apartheid
https://brainly.com/question/413554
#SPJ8