Answer:
Acceptable losses refer to casualties that are deemed necessary in order for a war effort to be successful. Major Whittlesey has a problem with the General's answer because it shows callous disregard for the lives of the men that were lost in battle, as though they were a number on a balance sheet. Major Whittlesey has personally seen the consequences of these losses, and is incensed at the thought of them being dismissed as merely a necessary part of war.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!! Have a great day/night!!
1
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
is an agreement among North American countries. The US government benefits from this
by giving American
easy access to North American
The North America Free-Trade
agreement because it expands the market for American.
markets
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an agreement among North American countries. The US government benefits from this agreement by giving American businesses easy access to North American markets. The North American Free Trade Agreement benefits the US government because it expands the market for American goods and services.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trilateral trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. It was established to promote economic integration and free trade among these countries. Under NAFTA, tariffs and trade barriers were reduced or eliminated, allowing for the seamless movement of goods and services across North American borders.
The US government benefits from NAFTA in several ways. Firstly, it provides American businesses with easy access to Canadian and Mexican markets, which expands their customer base and increases opportunities for growth and profitability. American companies can export their products to Canada and Mexico without facing significant trade barriers or tariffs, enabling them to compete more effectively in these markets.
Additionally, NAFTA encourages foreign direct investment by providing a predictable and stable business environment. American companies can establish operations or invest in Canada and Mexico, taking advantage of the lower production costs or accessing new markets. This promotes economic growth and job creation in the US.
Furthermore, NAFTA has led to increased competitiveness for American industries. By eliminating trade barriers, it has created a more level playing field for American businesses, allowing them to better compete with foreign companies. This can lead to improved efficiency, innovation, and productivity within the US economy.
In summary, the North American Free Trade Agreement benefits the US government by facilitating access to North American markets, expanding opportunities for American businesses, attracting foreign investment, and enhancing the competitiveness of American industries.
for more questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ8
Why do you think the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico
weren’t able to effectively resist the Spanish? What is a key
factor that stands out to you?
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them.
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them. In addition, the Spanish were able to gain the support of other native groups who had been oppressed by the same people they were fighting. A key factor that stands out in this situation is the technological advancements of the Spanish. They had guns, cannons, and horses, which the native people had never seen before. This gave them a significant advantage in battle, as well as in intimidating the native people. Furthermore, the Spanish had armor, which made them difficult to kill with the native people's weapons. The diseases that the Spanish brought with them were also devastating to the native people. The Spanish were immune to these diseases, but the native people were not, which led to a significant loss of life. In conclusion, the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to the Spanish's technological advantages and the diseases they brought with them.
To know more about technology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9171028
#SPJ11
How did Renaissance art differ from medieval art?
Select all correct answers.
Responses
Renaissance art appeared flat, while art of the Middle Ages used light, perspective, and depth.
Artists of the Renaissance used a very limited number of colors compared to art of the Middle Ages.
Artists of the Renaissance made figures look solid and lifelike by using light and shadow.
Figures in Renaissance art were shown in realistic proportions and positions.
Answer:
According to the search results, the correct answers to the question "How did Renaissance art differ from medieval art? Select all correct answers." are:
Renaissance art appeared flat , while art of the Middle Ages used light , perspective, and depth.
Artists of the Renaissance used a very limited number of colors compared to art of the Middle Ages.
Artists of the Renaissance made figures look solid and lifelike by using light and shadow.
Figures in Renaissance art were shown in realistic proportions and positions.
Therefore , all of the above statements are correct.
Explanation:
Which Progressive wrote a book that led to Standard Oil being broken up into smaller businesses? Responses a. Jane Addams
b. Ida Tarbell c. Upton Sinclair d. Jacob Riis
Answer:
Ida Tarbell wrote the book "The History of the Standard Oil Company" which exposed John D. Rockefeller's business practices and eventually led to the break up of the company into smaller businesses
Explanation:
According to the highlighted portion of the excerpt, what is the meaning of the concept of a "platform" of equality in relation to the central idea of Anthony's speech?
The concept of a "platform" of equality, in relation to the central idea of Anthony's speech, refers to a comprehensive set of principles, values, and policies that support and promote equal rights for women.
In Susan B. Anthony's speech, the concept of a "platform" of equality is closely tied to the central idea of advocating for women's rights. Anthony emphasizes the need for a solid foundation or framework that encompasses various aspects of equality, such as legal rights, social norms, and political participation. The platform represents a comprehensive approach to address the systemic barriers and biases that women face in society.
Expanding on this concept, the platform of equality encompasses a range of objectives, including suffrage rights, equal access to education and employment, and the elimination of discriminatory practices. It serves as a guiding framework for achieving gender equality, providing a roadmap for legislative and societal changes that uplift and empower women.
The platform of equality also implies the necessity of collective action and unity among women and their allies. By advocating for a platform, Anthony seeks to mobilize support and rally individuals around a shared vision of equality. It signifies the importance of concerted efforts and a coordinated approach to bring about lasting change.
Furthermore, the platform reflects Anthony's belief that achieving equality requires addressing multiple dimensions simultaneously. It is not limited to a single issue or demand but encompasses a wide range of rights and opportunities that are essential for women's full participation in society.
By emphasizing the concept of a platform of equality, Anthony aims to highlight the holistic nature of the fight for women's rights and the need for comprehensive reforms that address the underlying structures and systems that perpetuate gender inequality. It is a call to action for a multifaceted and inclusive approach to create a more just and equitable society for all.
To learn more about suffrage click here:
brainly.com/question/14201911
#SPJ11
Fully explain the history of women entering the police force. What are the challenges that they faced and what challenges do they still face? What are the challenges women in Corrections face? What are some advantages women have in the roles of police officer, corrections officer, or probation/parole officer?
The history of women entering the police force dates back to the 1800s when police departments in the United States were mostly male-dominated. In 1845, New York City established its first police department, which excluded women, and it took more than 100 years for women to be accepted into the force.
Challenges faced by women entering the police force When women first entered the police force, they encountered numerous challenges, including gender bias, discrimination, and harassment from their male counterparts. Many of them were seen as less capable of handling dangerous and difficult situations, which was seen as a “man’s job”. Moreover, there were social stereotypes that police work was too dangerous for women and that their presence might corrupt the moral fiber of the force, which prevented many women from joining the police force. Women were also not given equal opportunities for promotion and were paid lower salaries than their male counterparts. Women's challenges in correctionsWomen in corrections face some unique challenges in their work. Many of them face the danger of sexual harassment and assault from inmates, and they also face harassment and discrimination from their male colleagues. Moreover, they also face challenges in terms of work-life balance, as they work in a highly stressful environment, which can impact their mental and physical health. Advantages of women in law enforcement women bring unique skills and attributes to the roles of the police officer, corrections officer, or probation/parole officer. Women are often better communicators, are more empathetic, and can de-escalate tense situations more effectively. They are also more likely to be non-confrontational, which can be useful in handling delicate situations. Women have proven that they are just as capable as men in law enforcement roles and that they have what it takes to excel in these professions.
know more about women entering the police force.
https://brainly.com/question/6084799
#SPJ11
What did Alexander Hamilton not do as secretary of the Treasury.
How did Mary's family teach her to defy the typical
expectations of women in her time?
Drag each label to the correct location on the table
Match powers granted by the US Constitution to their types.
issue drivers' licenses
conduct elections
print money
make treaties with other countries
defense of the homeland
Enumerated Powers
Reserved Powers
The correct matching will be:
issue drivers' licenses - Reserved Powersconduct elections - Reserved Powersprint money - Enumerated Powersmake treaties with other countries - Enumerated Powersdefense of the homeland - Reserved PowersIssue drivers' licenses and conducting elections are examples of reserved powers granted by the US Constitution. Reserved powers are those not specifically delegated to the federal government and are instead reserved for the states. These powers allow states to regulate and manage certain aspects within their jurisdiction. On the other hand, the power to print money and make treaties with other countries are enumerated powers, explicitly granted to the federal government. The authority to defend the homeland falls under both categories, as it involves a combination of reserved powers exercised by the states and enumerated powers vested in the federal government, working together to ensure the safety and security of the nation.For more questions on Reserved Powers:
https://brainly.com/question/3599116
#SPJ8
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each hypothesis/arguments for extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America?
1. Climate change with warm weather.
2. Overkill by humans(by hunting).
Answer:
The extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America is a complex issue that has been the subject of much debate and research. Two of the main hypotheses that have been proposed to explain this extinction are climate change and overkill by humans. Here are some of the strengths and weaknesses of each hypothesis:
Climate Change Hypothesis:
Strengths:
- There is strong evidence that the climate was warming at the end of the Pleistocene epoch, which could have had a significant impact on the environment and the survival of megafauna.
- Climate change could have caused changes in vegetation patterns, which could have affected the availability of food for megafauna.
- Climate change could have also caused changes in the distribution of water resources, which could have affected the survival of megafauna that relied on water sources.
Weaknesses:
- The timing of the extinction of megafauna does not perfectly align with the timing of climate change. Some species went extinct before the most significant warming occurred.
- There were previous periods of climate change during the Pleistocene epoch that megafauna survived, which suggests that climate change alone may not have been the sole cause of extinction.
Overkill Hypothesis:
Strengths:
- There is evidence that humans were present in North America at the time of the megafauna extinction and that they were hunting large animals.
- There is also evidence that humans were capable of causing extinctions on other continents, such as Australia.
Weaknesses:
- There is some debate about the extent to which humans were responsible for the extinction of megafauna. Some researchers argue that the timing of the extinction does not match up with the arrival of humans, and that other factors may have been at play.
- There is also some evidence that suggests that humans may have coexisted with megafauna for thousands of years before the extinction, which suggests that overhunting may not have been the sole cause.
Overall, both the climate change and overkill hypotheses have their strengths and weaknesses, and it is likely that a combination of factors contributed to the extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America. Further research and evidence may be needed to fully understand the complex causes of this extinction.
What was presidents Roosevelt response to kristallnacht
Answer:
President Roosevelt responded to Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, by publicly condemning the violence and calling for an investigation into the incident. He also recalled US Ambassador Hugh Wilson from Germany in response to the Nazi treatment of Jews, and increased immigration quotas for refugees from Germany. The US Congress also passed a joint resolution condemning the “atrocities” and expressing support for the “civilized world”. Roosevelt’s response was considered relatively weak, however, in comparison to other democratic nations that sent troops to prevent similar episodes.
Explanation:
For your discussion this week I would like you to carefully review all the pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution In your initial post I would like an explanation of which piece of evidence you think the strongest piece of evidence is for evolution? How would you explain this to someone who doesn't think that evolution is occurring.
The key pieces of evidence supporting the theory of evolution include the fossil record, comparative anatomy, embryology, biogeography, and genetic evidence.
The fossil record provides a wealth of transitional fossils that demonstrate the gradual changes in species over time. Comparative anatomy reveals similarities in the bone structure and organs of different species, indicating common ancestry. Embryology shows similarities in the early stages of development among different species. Biogeography examines the distribution of species across different geographical regions, revealing patterns consistent with evolution. Genetic evidence, such as DNA sequencing, demonstrates genetic similarities and patterns of inheritance between species.
Among these pieces of evidence, genetic evidence is considered particularly strong. It provides a direct link between species and allows scientists to trace evolutionary relationships. By comparing DNA sequences, we can identify shared genetic markers and construct phylogenetic trees, showing the relatedness between different organisms.
This evidence not only supports the occurrence of evolution but also helps us understand the mechanisms and processes behind it. When explaining its significance to someone skeptical of evolution, emphasizing the robustness and consistency of genetic evidence can help illustrate the scientific consensus and the compelling case for evolutionary theory.
To know more about theory of evolution, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30300771
#SPJ4
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"What are the key pieces of evidence supporting the theory of evolution? Which piece of evidence do you consider to be the strongest, and how would you explain its significance to someone who doubts the occurrence of evolution?"-----------------
The Georgia General Assembly honored a local professional sports team for winning a championship. This is an
example of what?
O an act
a law
O a bill
O a resolution
The Georgia General Assembly honored a local professional sports team for winning a championship. This is an example of a resolution.
In legislative bodies like the Georgia General Assembly, resolutions are a common form of expressing the opinion or sentiment of the legislature on a particular matter. Resolutions can be used to recognize or honor individuals, organizations, or achievements, as well as to make a statement on a specific issue.
In this case, the resolution was passed by the Georgia General Assembly to honor the local professional sports team for their championship victory. It is a way for the legislature to publicly acknowledge and celebrate the team's accomplishment.
Resolutions differ from acts, laws, and bills in their legal standing and effect. While acts and laws are formal legislation that create or change legal provisions, resolutions do not have the force of law. Resolutions are typically non-binding and serve as a symbolic gesture or expression of support or recognition by the legislative body.
Therefore, in this context, the recognition given by the Georgia General Assembly to the local professional sports team would be considered an example of a resolution.
Know more about the Georgia General Assembly here:
https://brainly.com/question/30135835
#SPJ8
Witch period of egyptian occurred closest to the beginnig of the common era
The period of Egyptian history that occurred closest to the beginning of the Common Era is the Ptolemaic period.
Explanation: The Ptolemaic period in Egypt refers to the dynasty of pharaohs who ruled Egypt after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BCE until the Roman conquest of Egypt in 30 BCE. The Ptolemaic dynasty was founded by Ptolemy I Soter, one of Alexander's generals. This period is named after the ruling dynasty, which was of Macedonian-Greek origin.
The Ptolemaic period is known for its significant Greek influence and Hellenization of Egyptian culture. The Ptolemies adopted many aspects of Egyptian pharaonic traditions and presented themselves as pharaohs, but they also promoted Greek language, customs, and religion. The city of Alexandria, founded by Alexander the Great, became a thriving center of intellectual and cultural exchange during this period.
The end of the Ptolemaic period and the beginning of the Common Era marked a transition in Egyptian history as the Roman Empire gradually expanded its influence over the Mediterranean region. With the defeat of the last Ptolemaic queen, Cleopatra VII, by the Roman general Octavian (later known as Augustus), Egypt became a Roman province in 30 BCE. This marked the end of the Ptolemaic rule and the beginning of direct Roman control over Egypt.
In summary, the Ptolemaic period of Egyptian history, characterized by the rule of the Ptolemaic dynasty and the blending of Greek and Egyptian cultures, occurred closest to the beginning of the Common Era. It came to an end with the Roman conquest of Egypt, marking a significant transition in the region's history.
To learn more about Egyptian click here:
brainly.com/question/27926504
#SPJ11
Why in about 400 AD would settlers choose to settle on Easter Island?
Settlers may have chosen to settle on Easter Island around 400 AD due to its abundant natural resources, fertile land, and strategic location for trade and exploration.
The settlers who chose to settle on Easter Island around 400 AD were likely attracted by several factors.
First, the island offered a range of natural resources, including timber, fresh water, and fertile soil, which would have supported agricultural activities and provided sustenance for the settlers.
Additionally, the surrounding waters provided a rich source of fish and other marine life, ensuring a reliable food supply.
Furthermore, Easter Island's isolated location in the Pacific Ocean may have made it an attractive choice for settlers seeking a place to establish a new community. The distance from other populated areas could have provided a sense of security and allowed the settlers to maintain their own distinct culture and way of life.
Lastly, the strategic location of Easter Island may have played a role in attracting settlers. It served as a stopping point for voyagers and explorers crossing the Pacific, making it a hub for trade and exchange of goods and ideas.
In conclusion, the abundant natural resources, fertile land, and strategic location of Easter Island likely influenced settlers' decision to establish a settlement there around 400 AD.
For more questions on Settlers
https://brainly.com/question/24347206
#SPJ8
What is common complaint among protesters?
Answer:
Explanation:
Protesters may have various complaints depending on the specific context and issues they are advocating for. However, there are a few common complaints that often emerge among protesters:
1. Injustice and Inequality: Many protesters voice their concerns about perceived injustices and inequalities within society. This can include issues related to social, economic, racial, or gender inequality, as well as grievances against systems or institutions that they believe perpetuate unfairness.
2. Human Rights Violations: Protesters often raise concerns about human rights violations, both domestically and internationally. This can involve advocating for civil liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and opposing actions or policies that they believe infringe upon these rights.
3. Government Actions and Policies: Protesters frequently voice their opposition to specific government actions or policies that they perceive as detrimental to the public interest or contrary to their values. This can range from protesting against specific laws, government decisions, or controversial policies, such as those related to healthcare, education, immigration, or the environment.
4. Police Brutality and Misconduct: Protests against police brutality and misconduct are widespread and highlight concerns over excessive use of force, racial profiling, and systemic issues within law enforcement agencies. Such protests often call for police reform and accountability measures.
5. Environmental Issues: Many protests focus on environmental concerns, such as climate change, deforestation, pollution, or unsustainable practices. Activists often advocate for stronger environmental regulations, renewable energy, conservation efforts, and sustainable development.
6. War and Conflict: Demonstrations against wars, military interventions, and conflicts are another common complaint among protesters. These protests may express opposition to specific military actions, advocate for peaceful resolutions, or demand an end to armed conflicts.
It's important to note that the specific complaints can vary significantly depending on the social, political, and cultural context in which protests occur. Protest movements are driven by a wide range of grievances, and the above examples provide a general overview of common concerns raised by protesters worldwide.
Which idea applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale?
A.
Courts should be involved in matters of voting rights.
B.
Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
C.
Only the federal government can establish voting laws.
D.
Religious services in schools violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer: B. Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause
Explanation: The idea that applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale is that prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
Match each battle with its description.
Tiles
Pearl Harbor
El Alamein
Midway
Guadalcanal
Stalingrad
Anzio
Pairs
decisive naval victory for the United States
arrowBoth
battle that gave Allies control of Italy
arrowBoth
attack that caused the United States to enter the war
arrowBoth
single bloodiest battle of the twentieth century
arrowBoth
battle that prevented German troops from seizing
the Suez Canal
arrowBoth
battle for control of the sea route that connected
the United States with Australia
arrowBoth
The battles and their descriptions are as follows:
Pearl Harbor: attack that caused the United States to enter the war.Midway: decisive naval victory for the United States.Stalingrad: single bloodiest battle of the twentieth century.El Alamein: battle that prevented German troops from seizing the Suez Canal.Guadalcanal: battle for control of the sea route that connected the United States with Australia.Anzio: battle that gave Allies control of Italy.Pearl Harbor refers to the surprise military strike by the Imperial Japanese Navy on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941. The attack led to the United States' entry into World War II.The Battle of Midway was a pivotal naval battle fought in the Pacific in June 1942. The United States decisively defeated the Japanese fleet and turned the tide of the war in the Pacific in favor of the Allies.Stalingrad was a major battle fought between German and Soviet forces from August 1942 to February 1943. It was one of the deadliest battles in history, resulting in significant casualties and the defeat of the German army, marking a turning point on the Eastern Front.El Alamein refers to two battles fought in Egypt during World War II (1942). The second Battle of El Alamein was a significant Allied victory that prevented German troops from capturing the Suez Canal and halted their advance in North Africa.Guadalcanal was a campaign fought between the United States and Japan in the Pacific during World War II. The battle for Guadalcanal was crucial in securing control of the sea route between the United States and Australia.The Battle of Anzio took place in Italy in 1944. It resulted in the Allied forces gaining control of Anzio and the surrounding area, allowing them to launch an offensive and eventually liberate Rome.In summary, each battle played a significant role in World War II, with Pearl Harbor bringing the United States into the war, Midway securing a crucial naval victory, Stalingrad being the bloodiest battle, El Alamein preventing German advancement, Guadalcanal securing a sea route, and Anzio giving the Allies control of Italy.
For more questions on battles
https://brainly.com/question/27228932
#SPJ8
What was the result of President Franklin D Roosevelt want to increase the number of supreme court justices
The result of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices was unsuccessful. Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, which aimed to add more judges to the Supreme Court in order to reduce the number of old judges who were not favorable to his New Deal policies. The bill received criticism from both parties, and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted it down in July 1937. This proposal was seen as a violation of the separation of powers, and was heavily opposed by the public.
1. Who is the speaker and what is his position?
Nancy Pelosi is the current Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, representing the Democratic Party.
As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, the current Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is Nancy Pelosi. She assumed the position on January 3, 2019, during the 116th United States Congress. Nancy Pelosi is a member of the Democratic Party and represents California's 12th congressional district. She has a long and distinguished political career, serving as Speaker of the House previously from 2007 to 2011, making her the first woman to hold this position in U.S. history. As the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is responsible for leading the House of Representatives, presiding over sessions, maintaining order, and representing the House in its relations with the President and the Senate. She plays a crucial role in shaping legislative agendas, guiding the passage of bills, and providing leadership within her party. Please note that the information provided is accurate up until September 2021, and the current Speaker may have changed since then.Complete question should be Who is the current speaker of the United States House of Representatives and what is their position?
For more questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/28806805
#SPJ8
which was a result of britains plan to declonize india?
Answer: b. two new nations - a Hindu India and a Muslim Pakistan
Explanation: YIPPPEE
One of the world's largest statues of Jesus of Nazareth was built in Brazil, a former Portuguese colony. However, it was built in the early 20th century, long after Brazil gained independence from Portugal. What does the construction of this statue suggest about the cultural impact of Catholic missionaries on Brazilian culture?
Answer:
Christianity, especially Catholicism was still popular even after Brazil do decolonized
Explanation:
Large statues mean something important and in this case, Jesus. If the native Brazilian build a statue of Jesus even after Portuguese rule, this means that many of them followed Catholicism and the missionaries were a effective into converting the population.
1. What were the laws of migration from 1895?
2. What are some of the largest source countries for migration and the largest destination countries?
3. Why is migration within and into Europe extremely frequent?
4. What are 5 stages of U.S. immigration?.
5. What are 3 different migration patterns that have historically taken place within the US?.
Answer:
1. The Laws of Migration from 1895 refer to a set of principles developed by British demographer Ernst Ravenstein. These laws describe patterns observed in human migration and include:
- Most migrants move only a short distance.
- Long-distance migration is typically to larger cities and urban centers.
- Rural areas are more likely to be the source of migrants than urban areas.
- Migration is typically driven by economic reasons, such as seeking employment or better wages.
- Migration is typically counterbalanced by movements in the opposite direction.
2. The largest source countries for migration vary depending on the time period and region, but some of the countries that have historically been major sources of migration include Mexico, India, China, and the Philippines. The largest destination countries for migration include the United States, Canada, Australia, and various countries in Europe.
3. Migration within and into Europe is frequent for a number of reasons, including:
- The European Union's policy of free movement within member countries.
- The continent's history of colonialism and its legacy of migration and settlement.
- The ongoing conflicts and political instability in parts of the Middle East and Africa, which have led to large numbers of refugees and migrants seeking asylum in Europe.
- Economic factors, such as the search for better job opportunities and living standards.
4. The five stages of U.S. immigration, as described by historian Roger Daniels, are as follows:
- Pre-1820: The period of colonization and settlement by European immigrants.
- 1820-1880: The period of mass immigration, primarily from Northern and Western Europe.
- 1880-1924: The period of peak immigration, with large numbers of immigrants coming from Southern and Eastern Europe.
- 1924-1965: The period of restriction, with strict quotas and limits on immigration.
- 1965-present: The period of modern immigration, with a more diverse range of immigrants coming from all parts of the world.
5. Three different migration patterns that have historically taken place within the US include:
- Westward migration: The movement of settlers across the North American continent, particularly during the 19th century, in search of land, resources, and new opportunities.
- Urbanization: The movement of people from rural areas to cities in search of employment and other opportunities, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- Internal migration: The movement of people from one part of the country to another, often for economic reasons, such as the movement of African Americans from the rural South to urban centers in the North and West during the Great Migration of the early 20th century.
What did Muhammad instruct his followers to do during his Farewell Sermon?
Answer:
During his Farewell Sermon, Muhammad instructed his followers to adhere to the teachings he had set forth in the Quran and sunnah. He also emphasized the importance of unity among Muslims and warned against committing acts of injustice and spreading mischief in the land. Additionally, he reminded his followers of the sanctity of human life and property and advised them to treat women with kindness and care. Finally, he concluded the sermon with the famous words: "Take heed, therefore, to yourselves concerning them; it is not lawful to shed their blood or take their property without lawful right."
Explanation:
Answer: Muhammad instructed his followers to do the following during his Farewell Sermon:
To uphold the sanctity of life, property, and honor of all Muslims, and to avoid injustice and oppression.To abolish the practices of the pre-Islamic era, such as usury, blood vengeance, and tribalism, and to establish a brotherhood of faith and equality among all Muslims.To treat their women with kindness and respect, and to grant them their rights and duties.To worship God alone, and to perform the pillars of Islam, such as prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage.To follow his example and teachings, and to hold fast to the Quran and the sunnah.
Explanation: Muhammad’s Farewell Sermon is considered by Muslims to be one of his most important and comprehensive speeches, delivered shortly before his death on his final pilgrimage to Mecca. It summarizes the main teachings of Islam and provides guidance for Muslims on various aspects of their personal and social lives. Some of the main points that Muhammad instructed his followers to do during his Farewell Sermon are:
To uphold the sanctity of life, property, and honor of all Muslims, and to avoid injustice and oppression. Muhammad reminded his followers that they are all equal before God, and that they should not harm or wrong each other in any way. He declared that all bloodshed, theft, and violation of rights that occurred in the pre-Islamic era are forgiven and cancelled, and that no one has any claim or revenge over another. He also warned them that they will have to face God on the Day of Judgment and account for their deeds.To abolish the practices of the pre-Islamic era, such as usury, blood vengeance, and tribalism, and to establish a brotherhood of faith and equality among all Muslims. Muhammad denounced the customs and traditions that were based on ignorance and injustice, such as charging interest on loans, seeking revenge for bloodshed, and discriminating against people based on their race or lineage. He urged his followers to renounce these practices and to adopt a new way of life based on Islam. He emphasized that all Muslims are brothers and sisters, regardless of their origin or status, and that they should love and support each other.To treat their women with kindness and respect, and to grant them their rights and duties. Muhammad addressed the issue of women’s rights and responsibilities in Islam, which were often neglected or abused by men. He reminded his followers that women are their partners and helpers, not their property or slaves. He instructed them to feed and clothe them well, to honor their dignity and privacy, and to not oppress or harm them. He also stated that women have obligations towards their husbands, such as being faithful and obedient, and not making friends with those whom their husbands disapprove of.To worship God alone, and to perform the pillars of Islam, such as prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage. Muhammad reaffirmed the core belief of Islam: that there is no god but God (Allah), and that Muhammad is His messenger. He urged his followers to worship God sincerely and exclusively, without associating any partners or idols with Him. He also reminded them of the essential acts of worship that they should perform regularly: the five daily prayers (salah), the fasting during Ramadan (sawm), the obligatory charity (zakat), and the pilgrimage to Mecca (hajj) if they have the means.To follow his example and teachings, and to hold fast to the Quran and the sunnah. Muhammad declared that he has completed his mission of conveying God’s message to humanity, and that he has left behind two sources of guidance for Muslims: the Quran (the word of God) and the sunnah (the example of Muhammad). He advised his followers to adhere to these sources faithfully and diligently, without adding or subtracting anything from them. He also warned them against dividing into sects or factions over religious matters.Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
Who was responsible for civil rights
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964—legislation initiated by President John F. Kennedy before his assassination—into law on July 2 of that year. King and other civil rights activists witnessed the signing.
Answer: President Lyndon Johnson
Despite Kennedy's assassination in November of 1963, his proposal culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Lyndon Johnson signed it into law just a few hours after it was passed by Congress on July 2, 1964.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Part B
In your opinion, is this a positive or negative development? Why?
The shift towardsonline socialization instead of face-to-face interaction has both positive and negative aspects.
Why is this so?On the positive side, it allows people to connect with others across geographical boundaries,fostering diverse connections and expanding social networks.
Also , online platforms provide convenience and accessibility, particularly for individuals with physical limitations or social anxiety.
However,the lack of in-person interaction may lead to reduced empathy, isolation, and challenges in building deep,meaningful relationships, which can be considered negative consequences of this trend.
Learn more about socialization at:
https://brainly.com/question/28168229
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?Why?
When Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor in Germany, which of the following became an official policy?
When Adolf Hitler became Chancellor in Germany, the official policies that emerged included anti-Semitism, the establishment of a totalitarian state, and the pursuit of aggressive expansionist goals. These policies had far-reaching consequences, leading to the persecution of minority groups, the erosion of civil liberties, and ultimately, the devastation of World War II.
When Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor in Germany, one of the official policies that emerged was the implementation of the Nazi Party's ideology, which included the promotion of Aryan supremacy and the persecution of minority groups, particularly Jews. This policy, known as anti-Semitism, aimed to exclude Jews from society, strip them of their rights, and ultimately eliminate them from Germany.
Under Hitler's leadership, the Nazi regime implemented a series of discriminatory laws and regulations that targeted Jews. One of the most significant policies was the Nuremberg Laws, introduced in 1935, which stripped Jews of their German citizenship and prohibited marriage or sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews. These laws institutionalized the persecution of Jews and laid the groundwork for further oppressive measures.
Another official policy implemented by Hitler was the establishment of a totalitarian state. Hitler and the Nazi Party sought to centralize power and control all aspects of German society, including politics, economy, education, and culture. They suppressed political opposition, silenced dissenting voices, and implemented a system of propaganda to manipulate public opinion and maintain their grip on power.
Furthermore, Hitler's appointment as Chancellor also marked the beginning of Germany's rearmament and expansionist policies. In violation of the Treaty of Versailles, which had imposed restrictions on Germany's military capabilities after World War I, Hitler initiated a massive military buildup and embarked on territorial expansion. This aggressive policy eventually led to the invasion of neighboring countries and the outbreak of World War II.
for more questions on World War II.
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ8
Any help is appreciated
The Emancipation Proclamation was a significant step within the emancipation of oppressed people within the Joined together States, but its prompt affect was constrained. Its importance lies in its ethical and political impact.
What is the Emancipation Proclamation about?The Liberation Decree, issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, had noteworthy suggestions for different bunches amid the American Respectful War.
The Liberation Announcement pronounced that all subjugated people in Accomplice domain were from this time forward considered free. It pointed to weaken the Confederacy's labor constrain and debilitate their war exertion.
Learn more about Emancipation Proclamation from
https://brainly.com/question/12766031
#SPJ1
Complete the chart and discuss what the Emancipation Proclamation did or did not do for each group:
The Emancipation Proclamation The Emancipation Proclamation Did... Did Not...
In the Confederate States
In the Border States
For Freedmen in the North
Enslaved African-Americans in
the South
How were the motivations for establishing NATO and the Warsaw Pact similar?
A. Both were established to end the trade of nuclear weapons.
B. Both were established to protect the interests of countries with similar economic systems.
C. Both were established to spread the influence of the United States.
D. Both were established to provide financial assistance for countries rebuilding in postwar Europe.
Answer:
D. Both were established to provide financial assistance for countries rebuilding in postwar Europe is the most accurate statement regarding the motivations for establishing NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
How did Hitler and Stalin maintain everyday control of their citizens?
Answer:
Hitler and Stalin maintained control of their citizens through the use of terror tactics, stringent regulations, and government propaganda. Hitler's Nazi Party employed ruthless measures such as Gestapo secret police to terrorize citizens and eliminate any opposition. Stalin also used secret police (the NKVD), labor camps, limited access to food and medical care, and millions of executions to instill fear among his citizens. Both dictators also relied heavily on using government-sponsored propaganda to increase public support for their regimes and control the flow of information. Furthermore, citizens in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were required to adhere to a wide array of restrictions and regulations in order to maintain order and prevent the spread of rebellious ideas.
Explanation: