think the answer is no error or d
Explain how the poet uses words with particular connotations to
create a specific tone in the first stanza of "Sympathy". How does
his choice of words help you visualize what the stanza describes?
Cite textual evidence in your response.
In the first stanza of "Sympathy" the author has created a specific tone that evokes a range of emotions, such as sorrow, hopelessness, frustration, and empathy, in the readers.
In "Sympathy," the poet uses words with particular connotations to create a specific tone in the first stanza.
Paul Laurence Dunbar, the author of the poem, employs negative connotations and dark imagery to create an atmosphere of sorrow, isolation, and confinement.
The author's choice of words in the first stanza of "Sympathy" provides readers with a vivid and striking visual image of a bird trapped in a cage.
This image of the caged bird struggling and attempting to escape evokes a sense of suffocation, fear, and frustration.
The use of the word "bars" to describe the cage in which the bird is confined also has connotations of imprisonment, confinement, and a sense of being trapped.
This imagery contributes to the sense of hopelessness and despair that the poet wants to create.
The phrase "I know why the caged bird sings" indicates that the poet understands the bird's suffering and empathizes with it.
Through this metaphor of a caged bird, Dunbar highlights the struggles and oppression that African Americans faced during his time.
He also suggests that this poem represents the struggle for freedom and equality in America.
The metaphorical use of the caged bird in "Sympathy" establishes an emotional connection between the speaker and the readers.
Readers can visualize the bird's struggle and its fruitless efforts to escape the confinement of its cage.
This visual imagery enhances the poet's message of the importance of freedom, equality, and liberation.
Thus, through his use of words with specific connotations and visual imagery, the author has created a specific tone that evokes a range of emotions, such as sorrow, hopelessness, frustration, and empathy, in the readers.
For more questions on Paul Laurence Dunbar
https://brainly.com/question/22524251
#SPJ8
When the narrator says, "But I knew more trouble was on the
way..." he's giving us a clue that something bad is coming. Take
a guess. What do you think might happen? To Yummy? To
Roger? To Gary?
Answer:
To Gary
Explanation:
Use the dictionary entry for charisma to answer the question.
charisma
cha•ris•ma [kuh-riz-muh] adj
from Greek charis
1. a magnetic charm that appeals to people
In which sentences is the word charisma used correctly? Select three answers.
Most people seemed to respond to the candidate’s charisma rather than to his political agenda.
Benjamin was overwhelmed by his co-worker’s charisma, and he promised to repay him as soon as possible.
Alyssa’s acting talent was not great, but she hoped her charisma would secure her a role in the play.
Though Farhan could be charming, he knew that he could not rely on his charisma to get the job.
Julio used his charisma to haul the leaky boat and its soggy passengers out of the water.
The three sentences in which the word "charisma" is used correctly are:
1. Most people seemed to respond to the candidate’s charisma rather than to his political agenda.
2. Alyssa’s acting talent was not great, but she hoped her charisma would secure her a role in the play.
3. Though Farhan could be charming, he knew that he could not rely on his charisma to get the job.
In these sentences, the word "charisma" is used appropriately to describe a magnetic charm or personal appeal that attracts or influences people.
In the first sentence, "Most people seemed to respond to the candidate’s charisma rather than to his political agenda." it refers to the candidate's ability to captivate and engage the public despite the potential lack of substance in his political agenda.
In the second sentence, " Alyssa’s acting talent was not great, but she hoped her charisma would secure her a role in the play" it highlights Alyssa's belief that her personal charm will help her secure a role in the play despite her limited acting talent.
And in the third sentence, "Though Farhan could be charming, he knew that he could not rely on his charisma to get the job." it suggests that although Farhan possesses charm or charisma, he recognizes that it is not enough to guarantee him the job.
These examples align with the dictionary definition of charisma as a magnetic charm that appeals to people, demonstrating the correct usage of the term in context.
Know more about charisma here:
https://brainly.com/question/30562354
#SPJ8
Jamir was very bright Yolanda however was even more intelligent
In the given sentence, the hidden word is "however." The sentence states, "Jamir was very bright. Yolanda, however, was even more intelligent."
Here, the word "however" is the hidden word. It serves as a transitional adverb that introduces a contrast or contradiction between the statements about Jamir and Yolanda's intelligence.
The inclusion of "however" in the sentence adds a shift in emphasis, indicating that Yolanda's intelligence surpasses Jamir's despite his initial description as "very bright." The word "however" acts as a pivot point, redirecting the reader's attention to a new piece of information and altering the perspective on the topic being discussed.
Using transitional words like "however" helps to create a more nuanced and dynamic narrative by introducing contrasting ideas, highlighting differences, or presenting unexpected twists in the sentence structure. These words assist in maintaining coherence and guiding the reader through the flow of thought.
Identifying hidden words not only sharpens our language analysis skills but also enhances our comprehension of the underlying meaning and structure of a sentence. It allows us to uncover subtle linguistic devices and appreciate the deliberate choices made by writers to convey specific nuances and contrasts in their writing.
Learn more about language analysis skills here:
https://brainly.com/question/33248660
#SPJ11
which sentence best concludes the passage the Wage Gap
Which sentence best summarizes the key point in lines 32-40?
O Clyde Tombaugh was an intelligent, respected astronomer who discovered Pluto in
1930.
O Many astronomers once believed that "Planet X" influenced the orbits of Uranus and
Neptune.
Pluto's original status as a planet was an accident because it was based on
inaccurate information.
O Although many people feel passionate about Pluto's status, they must look at the
situation from a scientific viewpoint.
The key point in lines 32-40 is that Pluto's original status as a planet was an accident because it was based on inaccurate information. This is summarized in option C.
The passage suggests that astronomers believed in the existence of "Planet X" and thought it influenced the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Clyde Tombaugh's discovery of Pluto in 1930 was a result of the search for this hypothetical planet. However, further research and advancements in technology led to the realization that Pluto did not meet the criteria to be considered a planet.
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) redefined the definition of a planet, leading to Pluto's reclassification as a dwarf planet. The passage also implies that personal opinions about Pluto's status should be considered in light of scientific facts. Thus, option C accurately summarizes the main point of lines 32-40. Therefore the correct option is c
Know more about International Astronomical Union (IAU) here:
https://brainly.com/question/1742530
#SPJ8
What does the author mean when he describes the “great packing machine” at the beginning of the last paragraph? What type of literary device is the author using, and what does it add to the tone of the selection, or the attitude the author has toward a subject and his or her audience? Cite textual evidence in your response.
Answer:
Based on the search results, the author in question seems to be Upton Sinclair, and the "great packing machine" is a reference to the slaughter industry and meatpacking. The phrase "great packing machine" is an example of metaphor, where the complex and industrialized meatpacking process is compared to a machine. This metaphor emphasizes the dehumanizing and industrialized nature of the meatpacking industry and suggests that workers are simply cogs in a machine, rather than being valued individuals. This adds to the overall tone of the selection, which is critical of the meatpacking industry and its exploitation of workers.
In Chapter 14 of Sinclair's book "The Jungle," he writes, "they were part of the machine they were fed by it, clothed by it, sheltered by it, and when they died they were buried by it." This quote further emphasizes the metaphor and adds to the negative attitude Sinclair has toward the meatpacking industry and the treatment of its workers.
Explanation:
A strong swimmer, Gregory Goyle works as a
lifeguard every summer.
Does this sentence have a dangling modifier
No, the sentence does not have a dangling modifier.
A dangling modifier occurs when a modifying phrase or clause is not clearly or logically connected to the word or phrase it is intended to modify, resulting in a confusing or illogical sentence structure.
Dangling modifiers often take the form of an introductory phrase that is connected to the wrong thing. Fumbling in her purse, the keys could not be found.
In this sentence "A strong swimmer, Gregory Goyle works as a lifeguard every summer.", "A strong swimmer" serves as an introductory phrase that describes Gregory Goyle, and it is appropriately connected to the main clause "Gregory Goyle works as a lifeguard every summer." The sentence is grammatically correct and does not contain a dangling modifier.
To learn more about Dangling Modifiers,
https://brainly.com/question/29232989
What is logos?
A-an appeal to emotion
B-an appeal to ethics
C-an appeal to reason
D-an appeal to tradition
Answer:
C - an appeal to reason
Explanation:
Logos is an appeal to reason or logic
Pathos is an appeal to emotion
Ethos is an appeal to ethics or credibility
Answer:
C - An Appeal to Reason
Explanation:
The Greek word "logos" meant reasoning, or logic perhaps. It helps someone debate using their understanding of debating, or persuasive speaking toward a specific audience. Another way to find the answer is that the word "logos" is a cognate. A cognate is a word or phrase in another language that is similar to the word in English. Logos is similar to the word "logic" in English. Logic is similar to the word "reasoning", so C is the most valid answer.
While translating a text, the translator must:
A. never change the author's original wording and sentence
structure.
B. make decisions that affect how readers understand the translated
text.
C. change names of the characters.
D. rewrite the ending of the text.
Answer: B. make decisions that affect how readers understand the translated text
Explanation: While translating a text, the translator must make decisions that affect how readers understand the translated text.
Which elements cause catastrophe in Act V, scene iii
Othello's character flaws, Iago's manipulation, and the tragic fate of Desdemona and Emilia are the elements that cause catastrophe in Act V, scene iii of Othello. These factors lead to the downfall of the play's characters and ultimately make for a tragic ending.
Act V, scene iii of Shakespeare's play Othello, contains a great deal of tragedy and catastrophe. A range of elements can be identified as the causes of this tragedy. The elements that lead to catastrophe in Act V, scene iii of Othello are Othello's character flaws, Iago's manipulation, and the tragic fate of Desdemona and Emilia. First of all, Othello is responsible for his own downfall.
He is extremely gullible and susceptible to Iago's manipulation, which ultimately leads him to believe that Desdemona is unfaithful to him. Othello's lack of trust in Desdemona and his jealous nature are character flaws that lead to his catastrophic end.Secondly, Iago's manipulation plays a significant role in the tragedy. Iago is the mastermind behind Othello's tragic fate. He manages to convince Othello of Desdemona's supposed infidelity with Cassio by fabricating evidence and using his persuasive abilities.
He also manipulates Roderigo into helping him carry out his plan. Iago's manipulation is a crucial element that leads to the tragedy in Act V, scene iii. Finally, the tragic fate of Desdemona and Emilia plays a significant role in the catastrophe. Desdemona is an innocent victim of Othello's jealousy and rage, and her murder is one of the most tragic events in the play. Emilia, who is also innocent, is killed by her own husband, Iago. Their deaths add to the tragedy and make Act V, scene iii a truly catastrophic conclusion to the play.
For more such questions on Othello, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/20265011
#SPJ8
Read the following discussion:
MATT:
In The Great Gatsby, it's pretty clear that the only thing
Gatsby really wants in life is Daisy Buchanan.
IDA:
Right. I mean, his whole life has been about pursuing and
impressing Daisy. He's clearly fixated on her alone.
KELLY:
Do you really think that Daisy is his only motivation? What
about the whole idea of wealth? Maybe he doesn't want to
be involved with Daisy as much as he wants to be like her
and her husband.
JORGE:
That's probably true, at least a little. But the irony is that
Gatsby has always been living a lie. He even changed his
name in order to convince Daisy that he was wealthier than
he was. And even though now he really is wealthy, he has
to keep up the lies.
MATT:
So you might say that Gatsby has succeeded in his goal of
becoming one of the privileged and wealthy, but because
he's living a lie, he hasn't really succeeded at all. That's
really interesting.
Which student is most clearly asking a question that helps keep
the discussion moving?
A. Ida
B. Matt
C. Jorge
D. Kelly
SUBMIT
The student who is most clearly asking a question that helps keep the discussion moving is D. Kelly.
Kelly's question, "Do you really think that Daisy is his only motivation? What about the whole idea of wealth? Maybe he doesn't want to be involved with Daisy as much as he wants to be like her and her husband," introduces a new perspective and extends the conversation beyond the initial assertion.
By questioning the assumption that Daisy is Gatsby's sole motivation, Kelly opens up the discussion to consider other factors, such as Gatsby's desire for wealth and social status. This inquiry prompts further analysis and examination of Gatsby's motivations and ambitions, driving the conversation forward.
Kelly's question challenges the previous statements made by Matt and Ida, expanding the scope of the discussion and inviting different viewpoints. It encourages the other students to delve deeper into Gatsby's character and explore the complexities of his aspirations. Kelly's contribution ensures that the conversation remains dynamic and fosters a deeper understanding of Gatsby's motivations and the themes present in "The Great Gatsby." Therefore, Option D is correct.
Know more about Conversation here:
https://brainly.com/question/24549573
#SPJ8
A narrative...
A narrative...
is always fictional
is always non-fictional
persuades the audience
tells a story
Answer:
A narrative is a textual representation of a story or series of events. It typically has a beginning, middle, and end, and is designed to engage an audience. Depending on the authors’ intention, a narrative may be fictional or non-fictional. When a narrative is fictional, it can contain characters and events that are imaginary. If it is non-fictional, it will contain factual events and characters and may be used to persuade an audience to adopt a certain point of view. Regardless of whether the narrative is fictional or non-fictional, the main purpose of a narrative will be to tell a story and entertain the intended audience.
Explanation:
Answer:
A narrative is a fictional story, with unreal characters
Explanation:
my teacher
Persuasive speeches have a(n) __________________ obligation to the audience. a. ethical b. political c. social d. personal Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
The best answer to fill in the blank is "a. ethical." Persuasive speeches have an ethical obligation to the audience.
This means that the speaker should prioritize honesty, integrity, and respect for the audience's values and beliefs. Ethical persuasion involves presenting well-supported arguments, avoiding manipulation or deceitful tactics, and considering the well-being and rights of the audience. By fulfilling their ethical obligation, speakers aim to build trust, credibility, and promote a fair exchange of ideas during the persuasive process.
Learn more about Persuasive speeches here:
https://brainly.com/question/31539434
#SPJ11
How many kind of rhetorical appeals can you use at a time
There are three main types of rhetorical appeals: ethos, logos, and pathos. Each of these appeals can be used to make an argument more persuasive, but it is important to use them in a balanced and effective way.
Rhetorical appeals are techniques used in persuasive writing and speaking to make an argument more compelling. The three main types of rhetorical appeals are ethos, logos, and pathos.
Ethos refers to the credibility or trustworthiness of the speaker or writer. This involves demonstrating expertise in the subject matter, establishing common ground with the audience, and projecting a sense of authority and integrity.
Logos involves using logical reasoning, evidence, and facts to support an argument. This can include statistics, case studies, expert opinions, and other types of data.
Pathos involves appealing to the emotions of the audience. This can be done through the use of vivid descriptions, powerful anecdotes, personal stories, and other emotional appeals.
It is possible to use all three types of rhetorical appeals at once in order to make a more compelling argument. However, it is important to use them in a balanced way and to avoid relying too heavily on any one type of appeal.
For more such questions on rhetorical appeals, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ8
Discuss how the angel’s arrival affects or guides the lives of the people in this village in the story of a very old man with enormous wings
The arrival of the angel in the village in the story of A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings affects the people in the village in various ways. They are initially fascinated by the angel, then they begin to exploit him, and finally, they realize his divine powers.
The short story A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings by Gabriel Garcia Marquez tells the tale of an angel that falls from the sky and is discovered in a small town. The arrival of the angel affects or guides the lives of the people in the village in a number of ways.First, the people in the village are drawn to the angel's mysterious appearance and try to understand his nature. They are initially confused and try to understand his characteristics.
They notice his wings, which are enormous, and can't comprehend how he was able to fly with them. People came to see him and were fascinated by the way he looked.Second, the angel's arrival causes the people in the village to lose their way of life. The villagers start selling goods to visitors to the town, and they begin to exploit the angel. The townspeople make money by exhibiting the angel, and they start to see him as a spectacle rather than a divine being. People took advantage of the situation and treated the angel in an inhumane way.
This situation got worse when a carnival appeared in town and the owner wanted to buy the angel from the villagers. Third, the presence of the angel provides a glimmer of hope to the people of the village. The town priest thinks that the angel is an envoy from God and is disappointed that the angel did not bring any messages from heaven. When the villagers realize that the angel is not an evil creature and has healing powers, they start to see him as a hope for healing their various ailments.
For more such questions on A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29693831
#SPJ8
why do humans eat food
give your suggestions to maintain the glory of malaysian government today
Malaysia is a beautiful country and is known for its remarkable achievements in various fields like education, health, tourism, and technology. To maintain the glory of the Malaysian government today, here are some suggestions:
1. Education: Education is an essential element that lays the foundation for a developed country. Malaysian government should continue to invest heavily in education and provide quality education to its citizens. They should focus on modernizing the education system to meet the demands of the 21st century.
2. Healthcare: Healthcare is another crucial element that contributes to the well-being of the citizens. The Malaysian government should continue to invest in healthcare and provide affordable healthcare to its citizens.
3. Economic Growth: Economic growth is a critical factor in any country's development. The Malaysian government should continue to attract foreign investment to boost economic growth. They should also focus on the development of small and medium enterprises, which are the backbone of any economy.
4. Environment: The Malaysian government should continue to focus on protecting the environment. They should ensure that industries follow environmental regulations and that there is no pollution. They should also promote sustainable development to ensure that natural resources are preserved for future generations.
5. Infrastructure: Infrastructure development is essential for the country's development. The Malaysian government should continue to invest in infrastructure development to improve the transportation system and connectivity. The government should also focus on improving digital infrastructure to ensure that everyone has access to the internet.
In conclusion, the Malaysian government needs to focus on education, healthcare, economic growth, environment, and infrastructure development to maintain its glory today. By investing in these areas, Malaysia will continue to thrive and be a model country for others to emulate.
Know more about remarkable achievements here :
brainly.com/question/32869894
#SPJ8
how can a speaker best appeal to the audience
Question 4 of 5
In chapter 9, what do the tenant farmers do with most of their possessions?
OA. Give them to the bank.
OB. Sell them for little money.
OC. Pack them in their trucks.
O D. Leave them for their successors.
Which statement best describes the relationship
between the evidence in the two excerpts?
The statement that best describes the relationship between the evidence in the two excerpts is that assumptions are a cause of wrongful convictions.
The evidence provided in both excerpts shows that the criminal justice system can be biased based on assumptions made about suspects, especially if they belong to certain groups or have certain characteristics. Such assumptions can lead to wrongful convictions of innocent individuals. One excerpt describes how eyewitness misidentification can lead to false assumptions and ultimately wrongful convictions. The other excerpt discusses how wrongful convictions are more likely for those who are poor and cannot afford legal representation. Both of these cases illustrate how assumptions can lead to wrongful convictions, which highlights the need for more accurate and reliable methods of identifying suspects. The criminal justice system should strive to be more objective and evidence-based to ensure that innocent individuals are not wrongly accused or convicted.For more questions on the relationship
https://brainly.com/question/22964724
#SPJ8
The correct question would be as
Which statement best describes the relationship between the evidence in the two excerpts?
The evidence in both excerpts shows that racial bias plays a part in wrongful conviction.
The evidence in both excerpts shows that assumptions are a cause of wrongful convictions.
The evidence in both excerpts shows that poverty is a reason for wrongful convictions.
The evidence in both excerpts shows that social structures are a cause for wrongful convictions
Which of these themes are evident in Susan glaspells trifles
Multiple themes are evident in Susan Glaspell's play "Trifles," including 1. gender and the criminal justice system, 2. the harmful mental effects of isolation, 3. men's prejudices against women, and 5. the role of women in early twentieth-century society.
Firstly, the play explores the theme of gender and the criminal justice system. It reveals the unequal treatment of women within the legal system, highlighting how their perspectives and experiences are often dismissed. The play also emphasizes the harm caused by isolation, as seen through the character of Minnie Wright, who suffers mentally due to her isolated life on a remote farm.
Another theme present is men's prejudices against women. The male characters in the play consistently underestimate and belittle the abilities and intelligence of the female characters, showing the prevailing gender biases of the time. Additionally, "Trifles" offers insights into the limited roles and expectations placed on women in early twentieth-century society, reflecting on the broader theme of the position of women during that era.
However, the theme of fate and free will is not explicitly explored in "Trifles." While the play does not focus on the philosophical concepts of fate and free will, it primarily centers on the social and gender dynamics within its narrative. Overall, "Trifles" sheds light on the themes of gender and the criminal justice system, the harmful effects of isolation, men's prejudices against women, and the role of women in early twentieth-century society, providing a critique of societal norms and expectations of the time. Therefore, Option 1, 2, 3, and 5 are correct.
The question was incomplete. find the full content below:
Which of these themes are evident in Susan Glaspell's Trifles?
1. gender and the criminal justice system
2. the harmful mental effects of isolation
3. men’s prejudices against women
4. fate and free will
5. the role of women in early twentieth-century society
Know more about Susan Glaspell's play here:
https://brainly.com/question/29616770
#SPJ8
What are the pros and cons of each type of news source? Which type of news source is more reliable, independent or mainstream? Why? Answer in complete sentences and write at least 125 words help please
News sources can be categorized as independent or mainstream. Each type has pros and cons. Assessing their reliability depends on factors such as adherence to journalistic standards and fact-checking processes.
When evaluating news sources, it is important to consider the pros and cons of each type. Here are some general pros and cons:
Mainstream News Sources:
Pros:
Established reputation and credibility: Mainstream news outlets often have a long history and established standards of journalism.
Extensive resources: They often have large newsrooms, investigative teams, and access to various sources.
Wide audience reach: Mainstream sources have a broad readership or viewership, allowing them to disseminate information widely.
Professional standards: They usually adhere to journalistic ethics and fact-checking processes.
Cons:
Potential bias and influence: Mainstream sources may have corporate or political affiliations that can impact their coverage.
Sensationalism: Some mainstream outlets prioritize attracting audiences and may sensationalize stories for higher viewership.
Lack of diverse perspectives: Mainstream sources may have a limited range of viewpoints, leading to a narrower coverage of issues.
Dependency on advertising: Commercial interests can influence editorial decisions and coverage priorities.
Independent News Sources:
Pros:
Diverse perspectives: Independent sources often cover topics or present viewpoints that may not receive attention in mainstream media.
Greater focus on investigative journalism: They can dedicate more resources to in-depth reporting and uncovering hidden truths.
Reduced corporate influence: Independent outlets are not reliant on advertisers, potentially mitigating conflicts of interest.
Greater editorial freedom: They have more flexibility to address sensitive or controversial topics.
Cons:
Limited resources: Independent sources often have smaller budgets and staff, which can impact their coverage and reach.
Potential for bias and lack of fact-checking: Without stringent editorial processes, some independent outlets may lack rigorous fact-checking mechanisms.
Difficulty in establishing credibility: Independent sources may face skepticism due to their lack of a well-known reputation.
Determining the reliability of a news source depends on various factors, and it is not solely determined by being independent or mainstream. Both types can have reliable and unreliable sources within them. To assess reliability, factors such as adherence to journalistic standards, transparency, fact-checking processes, and a commitment to accuracy should be considered.
It is essential to evaluate each source on its merits and assess the credibility of individual journalists, editors, and their track records. Relying on multiple sources, both independent and mainstream, can provide a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of news events.
Know more about journalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/4111294
#SPJ8
After reading this excerpt, the reader would most likely be in suspense about which topic? select 2 options
After reading this excerpt, the reader would most likely be in suspense about the two topics Why Mr. Hyde left in such a hurry, Where Mr. Hyde actually went.
1. Why Mr. Hyde left in such a hurry: The excerpt mentions that the rooms have been ransacked, with clothes scattered, drawers open, and papers seemingly burned. This implies that something significant and possibly incriminating occurred, leading to Mr. Hyde's abrupt departure. The reader would be curious to understand the reasons behind Mr. Hyde's sudden and chaotic exit.
2. Where Mr. Hyde actually went: The excerpt does not provide information about Mr. Hyde's specific destination after leaving his home. The reader is left wondering where he might have fled and what his intentions or motivations were. Given the mysterious and ominous nature of Mr. Hyde's character, his whereabouts hold a sense of intrigue and uncertainty.
While the other options could also pique the reader's interest, such as the destruction of the checkbook, what was found behind the door, or when Mr. Hyde fled his home, the excerpt does not directly address these aspects. The focus is primarily on the ransacked rooms and the discovery of the burnt papers and the checkbook. Consequently, the reader's suspense would likely revolve around why Mr. Hyde left in a hurry and where he went, as these are the most immediate questions raised by the given information.
Know more about the reader here:
https://brainly.com/question/30009742
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the Full content below:
Read the excerpt from chapter 4 of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
At this moment, however, the rooms bore every mark of having been recently and hurriedly ransacked; clothes lay about the floor, with their pockets inside out; lock-fast drawers stood open; and on the hearth, there lay a pile of grey ashes, as though many papers had been burned. From these embers the inspector disinterred the butt end of a green checkbook, which had resisted the action of the fire; the other half of the stick was found behind the door; and as this clinched his suspicions, the officer declared himself delighted.
After reading this excerpt, the reader would most likely be in suspense about which topics Select 2 options.
how Mr. Hyde destroyed his checkbook
when Mr. Hyde fled his home
what was found behind the door
why Mr. Hyde left in such a hurry
where Mr. Hyde actually went
Write a readable story with the help of the following outline given in the b and add a suitable title and moral too. A king disappointed his people lazy to teach them a lesson had a big stone put in the middle of the road one night merchants pass and go round it...........an officer driving a car also did a young soldier came cycling, did the same stone and blamed the government for not removing it had the stone removed many people watched it all cursed then the ki an iron box, marked "For the man who moves away the stone" was a purse full of money the people were ashamed ****** ****** ins mora
Title: The Stone of Lessons
Once upon a time, in a prosperous kingdom, there was a wise and caring king who loved his people dearly. However, he noticed that his subjects had become lazy and complacent. Determined to teach them a lesson, he devised a plan.
One night, the king ordered a big stone to be placed in the middle of the main road. As dawn broke, merchants and travelers began to pass by, carefully maneuvering around the stone, grumbling about the inconvenience.
An officer, driving his car, also encountered the stone. He swerved around it and angrily blamed the government for not removing the obstruction. His words fell on deaf ears as he continued his journey, frustrated.
Shortly after, a young soldier came cycling down the road. He too encountered the stone but, instead of cursing or complaining, he immediately stopped. Realizing that he could remove the stone himself, he got off his bicycle, pushed it aside, and continued on his way.
Word quickly spread about the young soldier's actions, and people began to gather around the spot. To their surprise, they discovered an iron box, marked "For the man who moves away the stone." Inside the box was a purse overflowing with money.
As the people saw the contents of the box, they were overwhelmed with shame. They realized that their complaints and curses had been futile, while the young soldier had taken action and reaped the rewards.
The moral of the story is that it is easy to point fingers and complain, but true success and rewards come to those who take responsibility and initiative. Instead of blaming others, we should be proactive and find solutions to the problems we encounter.
To learn more about the story
https://brainly.com/question/24292088
#SPJ8
3. Discuss Junior's experiences at Reardan High School from what you've read so far. In your
response, be sure to discuss Junior's interactions with Roger
Junior's experiences at Reardan High School, as portrayed in the book "The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian" by Sherman Alexie, depict his struggles and triumphs as he navigates a predominantly white school as an Indigenous student.
One significant interaction that shapes Junior's experience at Reardan High is his relationship with Roger, a popular white student.
Initially, Junior and Roger have a confrontational relationship, with Roger representing the prejudices and stereotypes that Junior faces. Roger, along with his friends, frequently bullies and mocks Junior due to his background and appearance. This creates an environment of hostility and resentment, making Junior's integration into the school challenging.
However, as the story progresses, a significant turning point occurs during a basketball game between Reardan High and Wellpinit, Junior's home school on the Spokane Indian Reservation. Junior is determined to prove himself on the court and plays exceptionally well, gaining the admiration of both his teammates and opponents. Roger witnesses Junior's skill and, in a surprising moment of solidarity, acknowledges and respects his talent.
This pivotal moment initiates a transformation in their relationship. Roger reaches out to Junior and expresses admiration for his basketball skills. Junior, in turn, realizes that not all of his classmates hold prejudiced views. Their interaction signifies the possibility of friendship and understanding beyond racial boundaries.
Junior's experiences at Reardan High School, including his interactions with Roger, demonstrate the complexity of overcoming stereotypes and prejudices. Through their evolving relationship, the narrative highlights the potential for empathy and the breaking down of barriers when individuals are willing to challenge preconceived notions and find common ground.
In summary, Junior initially faces hostility from Roger and his friends, who mock and bully him due to his Indigenous background. However, a turning point occurs during a basketball game where Roger witnesses Junior's skill and expresses admiration. This interaction signifies the potential for understanding and friendship beyond racial boundaries, highlighting the power of empathy and breaking down stereotypes.
Learn more about Indigenous student here:
https://brainly.com/question/27950830
#SPJ11
My aunt, as well as all of my cousins, (have,has) been sick this past week.
have , the subject is plural
Mark me as brainliest
Why does Carrie discover a new atmosphere when she reenters the streetWhat can you infer about Helen’s teacher, Miss Sullivan?
When Carrie reenters the street, her discovery of a new atmosphere suggests a significant change in her surroundings. This change could be due to several factors.
Firstly, it's possible that Carrie has entered a different neighborhood or part of town with a distinct ambiance. This could be characterized by different buildings, people, or cultural elements that contribute to a unique atmosphere.
Alternatively, Carrie's perception of a new atmosphere may stem from a personal transformation or shift in her perspective. Perhaps she has undergone personal growth or a change in mindset, allowing her to see the familiar street in a different light.
This could be influenced by experiences, interactions, or newfound knowledge that has broadened her understanding of the world.
Regarding Miss Sullivan, it is difficult to infer specific details about her based on the given information. However, we can make some educated guesses.
Miss Sullivan is likely a dedicated and effective teacher as she has helped Helen make notable progress in her education. Her teaching methods may be unconventional yet successful, as evidenced by Helen's ability to communicate with others through sign language.
Additionally, Miss Sullivan demonstrates patience, perseverance, and adaptability in her teaching approach. She is sensitive to Helen's needs and works tirelessly to break down barriers to her education.
Miss Sullivan's commitment to Helen's development suggests a deep passion for teaching and a strong belief in the potential of her students. Overall, Miss Sullivan appears to be a compassionate and skilled educator, dedicated to helping her students overcome challenges and achieve their full potential.
For more such questions on Carrie,click on
https://brainly.com/question/6543163
#SPJ8
how does Dorian Gray’s inability to age save him from justice and not his conscious
Answer:
At the opening of the novel, Dorian Gray exists as something of an ideal: he is the archetype of male youth and beauty. As such, he captures the imagination of Basil Hallward, a painter, and Lord Henry Wotton, a nobleman who imagines fashioning the impressionable Dorian into an unremitting pleasure-seeker. Dorian is exceptionally vain and becomes convinced, in the course of a brief conversation with Lord Henry, that his most salient characteristics—his youth and physical attractiveness—are ever waning. The thought of waking one day without these attributes sends Dorian into a tailspin: he curses his fate and pledges his soul if only he could live without bearing the physical burdens of aging and sinning. He longs to be as youthful and lovely as the masterpiece that Basil has painted of him, and he wishes that the portrait could age in his stead. His vulnerability and insecurity in these moments make him excellent clay for Lord Henry’s willing hands.
Explanation:
how did the siege and two friends show events similarly
The Siege and Two Friends are two entirely distinct events with contrasting themes and plots. The Siege is a 1998 action thriller movie directed by Edward Zwick, and Two Friends is a 1986 drama film directed by Jane Campion. However, these two movies share a common element in their portrayal of the effect of social-political turmoil on personal relationships.
The Siege is set in a contemporary America under a terrorist attack from an Islamic extremist group, resulting in a brutal crackdown by law enforcement. This crackdown leads to the roundup and imprisonment of Arab American citizens, resulting in a series of human rights violations.
Two Friends, on the other hand, takes place during World War I, and it follows two teenage girls who find themselves torn apart by the war. The movie depicts how their friendship gets affected by the war, and how their lives and aspirations change as the war continues.
Although they have contrasting settings and themes, both movies show the impact of political unrest on personal relationships. They demonstrate how political turmoil can result in suspicion, mistrust, and the breaking up of strong relationships between individuals.
The Siege and Two Friends are great examples of how political upheaval can have significant consequences on human relationships. They show that although relationships can be tested and strained during times of crisis, they can also persevere and become even stronger.
For more such questions on The Siege, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/274571
#SPJ8