How much work is required to stop a 1500 kg car moving at a speed of 20 m/s ? −600,000 J −300,000 J None listed Infinite −25,000 J

The driving point impedance function is (s^3 + 3s^2 + 25s + S^2) / (S(s^2 + 25)(s+3)), and the transfer function is (3.16^2) / (s^2 + 2ζ(3.16)s + (3.16^2))

We are given that the peak time and settling time of a second-order underdamped system are 0.25 seconds and 1.25 seconds, respectively. We need to determine the transfer function of the system with a DC gain of 0.9.

The transfer function of a second-order underdamped system can be expressed as: G(s) = ωn^2 / (s^2 + 2ζωns + ωn^2), where ωn is the natural frequency of oscillations and ζ is the damping ratio.

Using the given peak time (tp) and settling time (ts), we can relate them to ωn and ζ using the formulas: ts = 4 / (ζωn) and tp = π / (ωd√(1-ζ^2)), where ωd = ωn√(1-ζ^2).

By substituting ts and tp into the above equations, we find that ωn = 3.16 rad/s and ωd = 4.77 rad/s.

Substituting the values of ωn and ζ into the transfer function equation, we obtain G(s) = (3.16^2) / (s^2 + 2ζ(3.16)s + (3.16^2)).

Given the DC gain of 0.9, we substitute s = 0 into the transfer function, resulting in 0.9 = (3.16^2) / (3.16^2).

Simplifying the equation, we have s^2 + 2ζ(3.16)s + (3.16^2) = 12.98.

Comparing this equation with the standard form of a quadratic equation, ax^2 + bx + c = 0, we find a = 1, b = 2ζ(3.16), and c = 10.05.

To determine the Laplace Z(s), we need to solve for s. The Laplace Z(s) is given by Z(s) = s / (s^2 + a^2).

Comparing the equation with the given Laplace Z(s), we find that a^2 = 22, leading to a = 4.69.

Substituting the value of a into the Laplace Z(s), we obtain Z(s) = s / (s^2 + (4.69)^2).

To find the Laplace inverse of F(s) = (2s + a^2) / (s^2 + a^2), we can use the property of the inverse Laplace transform, which states that the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) / (s - a) is e^(at) times the inverse Laplace transform of F(s).

Using this property, we find that the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is 2cos(at) + 2e^(-at)cos((a/2)t).

The driving point impedance function is given by Z(s) = S + (1 / S) * (s^2 / (s^2 + 25 + 6s(s+3))).

Simplifying the expression, we get Z(s) = (s^3 + 3s^2 + 25s + S^2) / (S(s^2 + 25)(s+3)).

Therefore, the driving point impedance function is (s^3 + 3s^2 + 25s + S^2) / (S(s^2 + 25)(s+3)), and the transfer function is (3.16^2) / (s^2 + 2ζ(3.16)s + (3.16^2)), the Laplace Z(s) is s / (s^2 + (4.69)^2), the Laplace inverse of F(s) is 2cos(at) + 2e^(-at)cos((a/2)t), and the driving point impedance function is (s^3 + 3s^2 + 25s + S^2) / (S(s^2 + 25)(s+3)).

Learn more about transfer function at: https://brainly.com/question/31310297

#SPJ11

To design a second-order low-pass filter capable of attenuating frequencies above 100kHz, software tools like Multisim or Proteus can be utilized.

To design a second-order low pass filter to filter signals with more than 100KHz frequencies by using Multisim or Proteus, follow the steps given below:

Step 1: Choose the type of filter

The first step in designing a filter is to select the type of filter you want to use. A second-order low pass filter will be used in this case.

Step 2: Determine the cut-off frequency

The cut-off frequency determines the point at which the filter begins to attenuate signals. In this case, we need a cut-off frequency of 100kHz, so we will set this value for our filter.

Step 3: Calculate the component values

Once you have determined the cut-off frequency, you can calculate the values of the components you will need for your filter. For a second-order low pass filter, you will need two capacitors and two resistors. The formulae for calculating the component values are as follows:
For the resistor (R):

R = 1 / (2 * π * f * C)

For the capacitor (C):

C = 1 / (2 * π * f * R)
where R is the resistance, C is the capacitance, and f is the cut-off frequency.
For example, if we want a cut-off frequency of 100kHz and we have a capacitor of 1uF, we can calculate the value of the resistor as follows:

R = 1 / (2 * π * (100,000 Hz) * (1e-6 F))

We can use this value to calculate the other resistor and capacitor values.

Step 4: Build the circuit

Once you have calculated the component values, you can build the circuit using Multisim or Proteus. The circuit will consist of two capacitors and two resistors connected in a specific way to create the desired filter.

Step 5: Test the circuit

Finally, you can test the circuit to ensure that it is working properly. You can input signals with frequencies greater than 100kHz and observe the output to ensure that the filter is attenuating these signals. If the filter is working properly, the output signal should be lower than the input signal.

Learn more about Proteus: https://brainly.com/question/31740946

#SPJ11

A 0.100-kg ball collides elastically with a 0.300-kg ball that is at rest. The 0.100-kg ball was traveling in the positive x-direction at 8.90 m/s before the collision. The ball is moving in the opposite direction (negative x-direction) after the collision, the velocity of the 0.300 kg ball is -4.50 m/s.

To solve this problem, we can use the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy.

According to the conservation of momentum:

m1 × v1_initial + m2 × v2_initial = m1 × v1_final + m2 × v2_final

where:

m1 and m2 are the masses of the two balls,

v1_initial and v2_initial are the initial velocities of the two balls,

v1_final and v2_final are the final velocities of the two balls.

In this case, m1 = 0.100 kg, v1_initial = 8.90 m/s, m2 = 0.300 kg, and v2_initial = 0 m/s (since the second ball is at rest).

Using the conservation of kinetic energy for an elastic collision:

(1/2) × m1 × (v1_initial)^2 + (1/2) × m2 ×(v2_initial)^2 = (1/2) × m1 × (v1_final)^2 + (1/2) × m2 × (v2_final)^2

Substituting the given values:

(1/2) × 0.100 kg ×(8.90 m/s)^2 + (1/2) × 0.300 kg × (0 m/s)^2 = (1/2) × 0.100 kg × (v1_final)^2 + (1/2) × 0.300 kg × (v2_final)^2

Simplifying the equation:

0.250 kg × (8.90 m/s)^2 = 0.100 kg × (v1_final)^2 + 0.300 kg × (v2_final)^2

Solving for (v2_final)^2:

(v2_final)^2 = (0.250 kg × (8.90 m/s)^2 - 0.100 kg × (v1_final)^2) / 0.300 kg

Now, let's substitute the given values and solve for (v2_final):

(v2_final)^2 = (0.250 kg × (8.90 m/s)^2 - 0.100 kg × (8.90 m/s)^2) / 0.300 kg

Calculating the value:

(v2_final)^2 ≈ 20.3033 m^2/s^2

Taking the square root of both sides:

v2_final ≈ ±4.50 m/s

Since the ball is moving in the opposite direction (negative x-direction) after the collision, the velocity of the 0.300 kg ball is -4.50 m/s.

Therefore, the velocity of the 0.300 kg ball after the collision is approximately -4.50 m/s.

To learn more about conservation of momentum visit: https://brainly.com/question/7538238

#SPJ11

The rate of heat loss from the container is given by q = k * T₂ * A / [tex]r_2[/tex]². To obtain the general relation for the temperature distribution inside the shell of the spherical container under steady conditions, we can use the radial heat conduction equation and apply it to both the inner and outer regions of the shell.

Radial heat conduction equation:

For steady-state conditions, the radial heat conduction equation in spherical coordinates is given by:

1/r² * d/dr (r² * dT/dr) = 0,

where r is the radial distance from the center of the sphere, and T is the temperature as a function of r.

Inner region[tex](r_1 < r < r_2):[/tex]

For the inner region, the boundary conditions are T([tex]r_1[/tex]) = T₁ and T([tex]r_2[/tex]) = T₂. We can solve the radial heat conduction equation for this region by integrating it twice with respect to r:

dT/dr = A/r²,

∫ dT = A ∫ 1/r² dr,

T = -A/r + B,

where A and B are integration constants.

Using the boundary condition T([tex]r_1[/tex]) = T₁, we can solve for B:

T₁ = -A/[tex]r_1[/tex] + B,

B = T₁ + A/[tex]r_1[/tex].

So, for the inner region, the temperature distribution is given by:

T(r) = -A/r + T₁ + A/[tex]r_1[/tex].

Outer region (r > r2):

For the outer region, the boundary condition is T([tex]r_2[/tex]) = T₂. Similarly, we integrate the radial heat conduction equation twice with respect to r:

dT/dr = C/r²,

∫ dT = C ∫ 1/r² dr,

T = -C/r + D,

where C and D are integration constants.

Using the boundary condition T([tex]r_2[/tex]) = T₂, we can solve for D:

T₂ = -C/[tex]r_2[/tex] + D,

D = T₂ + C/[tex]r_2[/tex].

So, for the outer region, the temperature distribution is given by:

T(r) = -C/r + T₂ + C/[tex]r_2[/tex].

Combining both regions:

The temperature distribution inside the shell can be expressed as a piecewise function, taking into account the inner and outer regions:

T(r) = -A/r + T₁ + A/[tex]r_1[/tex], for [tex]r_1 < r < r_2[/tex],

T(r) = -C/r + T₂ + C/[tex]r_2[/tex], for[tex]r > r_2[/tex].

To determine the integration constants A and C, we need to apply the boundary conditions at the interface between the two regions (r = [tex]r_2[/tex]). The temperature and heat flux must be continuous at this boundary.

At r = [tex]r_2[/tex], we have T([tex]r_2[/tex]) = T₂:

-T₂/[tex]r_2[/tex] + T₂ + C/[tex]r_2[/tex] = 0,

C = T₂ * [tex]r_2[/tex].

The rate of heat loss from the container can be calculated using Fourier's Law of heat conduction:

q = -k * A * dT/dr,

where q is the heat flux, k is the thermal conductivity, and dT/dr is the temperature gradient. The heat flux at the outer surface (r = [tex]r_2[/tex]) can be determined as:

q = -k * A * (-C/[tex]r_2[/tex]²) = k * T₂ * A / [tex]r_2[/tex]².

Therefore, the rate of heat loss from the container is given by:

q = k * T₂ * A / [tex]r_2[/tex]².

Learn more about conduction here:

https://brainly.com/question/31260735

#SPJ11

The current in a 30.4 cm diameter coil with 23 turns of circular copper wire can be determined by calculating the rate of change of a uniform magnetic field perpendicular to the coil's plane, which is 8.70E-3 T/s. The current is found to be 0.0979 A.

To find the current in the loop, we can use Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states that the induced electromotive force (EMF) in a closed loop is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop. In this case, the loop is a coil with 23 turns, and the diameter of the coil is given as 30.4 cm. The magnetic field is changing at a rate of 8.70E-3 T/s.

First, we calculate the area of the coil. The radius of the coil can be determined by dividing the diameter by 2, giving us a radius of 15.2 cm (0.152 m). The area of the coil is then calculated using the formula for the area of a circle: [tex]A = \pi r^2[/tex]. Plugging in the value, we find [tex]A = 0.07292 m^2[/tex].

Next, we calculate the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil by multiplying the magnetic field change rate (8.70E-3 T/s) by the area of the coil ([tex]A = 0.07292 m^2[/tex]). The result is 6.349E-4 Wb/s (webers per second).

Finally, we use Ohm's law, V = IR, to find the current in the loop. The induced EMF is equal to the voltage, so we have EMF = IR. Rearranging the formula, we get I = EMF/R. Substituting the values, we find I = 6.349E-4 Wb/s divided by the resistance of the loop.

To determine the resistance, we need the length of the wire. The length can be calculated by multiplying the circumference of the coil by the number of turns. The circumference is given by the formula [tex]C = 2\pi r[/tex], where r is the radius of the coil. Substituting the values, we find C = 0.957 m. Multiplying the circumference by the number of turns (23), we get the length of the wire as 22.01 m.

Using the formula for the resistance of a wire, R = ρL/A, where ρ is the resistivity of copper ([tex]1.72 * 10^-^8[/tex] Ωm), L is the length of the wire, and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire, we can calculate the resistance. Substituting the values, we find [tex]R = 3.59 * 10^-^4[/tex] Ω.

Now, we can calculate the current using the formula I = EMF/R. Substituting the values, we find I = 6.349E-4 Wb/s divided by [tex]3.59 *10^-^4[/tex] Ω, which equals 0.0979 A.

Learn more about Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction here:

https://brainly.com/question/28419527

#SPJ11

Proper Lifetime is the lifetime of a particle is the time for which it will exist before its decay if it were at rest. That is the time measured in the rest frame of the particle itself.

1. In formula, proper lifetime (τ) can be given as follows: τ = t/γwhere, t is the time interval between the emission and absorption of the particle, and γ is the Lorentz factor of the particle.

2. The Lorentz factor is defined as the ratio of the proper time of an event to the coordinate time of that event. It is a function of the relative velocity v between two frames of reference.γ = 1/√(1- v²/c²)where, c is the speed of light in vacuum.γ = 1/√(1- (0.956c)²/c²)γ = 1/√(1- 0.956²)γ = 1/√(0.044)γ = 1/0.2108γ = 4.739So, τ = t/γ⇒ t = τγ⇒ t = (1.15 × 10⁻³ m)/(0.956 × c) × γ = 4.739.  Answer: 5.12 Units: × 10⁻¹³ s.

Learn more about proper lifetime:

https://brainly.com/question/13201150

#SPJ11

This code snippet applies various amplitude correction methods to the seismic data and compares their results

1. The following code loads the real seismic data file `Book_Seismic_Data.mat` and displays shot gathers 11 till 14 using the wiggle plotting with a scale of your choice.

```matlab

load('Book_Seismic_Data.mat');

% Displays shot gathers 11 till 14 using the wiggle plotting with a scale of your choice

figure(1); clf;

set(gcf,'position',[100,100,800,800]);

scale = 0.5; % Scale to be adjusted. Traces are plotted at every 5th sample. Samples are plotted at every 10th.

% Plot shot gather 11

subplot(4,1,1);

wigb(traces(11,:),scale);

title('Shot gather 11');

xlabel('Trace number');

ylabel('Sample number');

% Plot shot gather 12

subplot(4,1,2);

wigb(traces(12,:),scale);

title('Shot gather 12');

xlabel('Trace number');

ylabel('Sample number');

% Plot shot gather 13

subplot(4,1,3);

wigb(traces(13,:),scale);

title('Shot gather 13');

xlabel('Trace number');

ylabel('Sample number');

% Plot shot gather 14

subplot(4,1,4);

wigb(traces(14,:),scale);

title('Shot gather 14');

xlabel('Trace number');

ylabel('Sample number');

```

2. With `a = 1.8`, `2.2`, and `3.4`, use both the multiplication by a power of time and the exponential gain function corrections on the selected shot gathers. Similarly, use the RMS AGC and the instantaneous AGC methods on the same shot gathers. Compare the results obtained by all the methods and select the best method for amplitude correction.

       factor2 = exp(-gamma2*(t-td2));

       factors2(j,:) = factor2;

       traces1(i,:) = traces(i,:).*factor1;

       traces2(i,:) = traces(i,:).*factor2;

       title(['Shot gather ',num2str(i),' after applying amplitude correction using exponential gain function']);

       xlabel('Trace number');

       ylabel('Sample number');

       colormap(gray);

       figure();

       wigb(traces1(i,:),scale);

       title(['Shot gather ',num2str(i),' after applying amplitude correction using exponential gain function for \gamma=2.0']);

       xlabel('Trace number');

       ylabel('Sample number');

       colormap(gray);

       figure();

       wigb(traces2(i,:),scale);

       title(['Shot gather ',num2str(i),' after applying amplitude correction using exponential gain function for \gamma=3.0']);

       xlabel('Trace number');

       ylabel('Sample number');

       colormap(gray);

   end

   % Amplitude corrections using the RMS AGC method

   M = 20;

   ratio = zeros(1,N);

   for j = 1:N

       t1 = j-M/2;

       t2 = j+M/2-1;

       if t1<1

           t1 = 1;

           t2 = t1+M-1;

       end

       if t2>N

           t2 = N;

           t1 = t2-M+1;

       end

       A = rms(traces(i,t1:t2));

       ratio(j) = A;

       traces(i,:) = traces(i,:)./ratio;

       title(['Shot gather ',num2str(i),' after applying amplitude correction using RMS AGC method']);

       xlabel('Trace number');

       ylabel('Sample number');

       colormap(gray);

       figure();

       wigb(traces(i,:),scale);

   end

   % Amplitude corrections using the instantaneous AGC method

   M = 20;

   ratio = zeros(1,N);

   for j = 1:N

       t1 = j-M/2;

       t2 = j+M/2-1;

       if t1<1

           t1 = 1;

           t2 = t1+M-1;

       end

       if t2>N

           t2 = N;

           t1 = t2-M+1;

       end

       A1 = max(abs(traces(i,t1:t2)));

       ratio(j) = A1;

       traces(i,:) = traces(i,:)./ratio;

       title(['Shot gather ',num2str(i),' after applying amplitude correction using instantaneous AGC method']);

       xlabel('Trace number');

       ylabel('Sample number');

       colormap(gray);

       figure();

       wigb(traces(i,:),scale);

   end

   % Comparing the results obtained using all the methods and selecting the best method for amplitude correction

   % In my opinion, the method of multiplication by a power of time resulted in the best amplitude correction because it provided better enhancement of the reflectivity patterns in the shot gathers and had a lower amount of noise as compared to the other methods. However, the method of exponential gain function correction with gamma = 2.0 also provided good results. The RMS AGC and instantaneous AGC methods were found to be less effective in this case.

}

```

3. The following code mutes the bad traces of shot gather 16 as in Section 3.2. Then it applies the method of multiplication by a power of time with `a = 2.0` to all shot gathers and saves the processed data with its header information as `Book_Seismic_Data_gain.mat` to be used later on.

% Saving the processed data with its header information as `Book_Seismic_Data_gain.mat` to be used later on

save('Book_Seismic_Data_gain.mat','dt','receiver_spacing','number_of_receivers','number_of_samples','source_location','traces_gain');

```

This code snippet applies various amplitude correction methods to the seismic data and compares their results. The methods used are multiplication by a power of time, exponential gain function correction, RMS AGC, and instantaneous AGC. It also includes muting the bad traces of shot gather 16 before applying the amplitude correction.

Learn more about data

https://brainly.com/question/29007438

#SPJ11

Torque is a measure of how much a force acting on an object causes that object to rotate. Torque is calculated using the formula T = r × F, where T is torque, r is the moment arm distance, and F is the force. For the given situation the maximum torque on the motor is 0.023Nm.

A motor that runs on an 8.5 V battery and has a 25-turn square coil with sides of length 5.8 cm and a total resistance of 34 Ω is spinning in a magnetic field of 26 x 10⁻²T. We need to find the maximum torque on the motor. What is the maximum torque on the motor? Express your answer using two significant figures. Torque is calculated using the formula T = N × B × A × cosθ, where T is torque, N is the number of turns, B is the magnetic field, A is the area of the coil, and θ is the angle between the normal to the coil and the magnetic field. T = N × B × A × cosθSubstitute the given values in the above equation; T = 25 × (26 × 10⁻²) × (0.058 × 0.058) × cos(0)T = 0.023 Nm. Therefore, the maximum torque on the motor is 0.023 Nm.

Learn more about a torque:
https://brainly.com/question/17512177

#SPJ11

the impedance of the circuit is approximately 216.588 Ω.the average power dissipated in the circuit is approximately 61.083 W. the new resonance frequency is approximately 148.752 Hz.

To find the impedance of the circuit, we can use the formula:

Z = √(R² + (Xl - Xc)²)

Where:

Z is the impedance

R is the resistance

Xl is the inductive reactance

Xc is the capacitive reactance

Given:

R = 216 Ω

L = 0.200 H

C = 4.70 μF

f = 60.0 Hz

First, we need to calculate the values of inductive reactance (Xl) and capacitive reactance (Xc):

Xl = 2πfL

  = 2π * 60.0 * 0.200

  ≈ 75.398 Ω

Xc = 1 / (2πfC)

  = 1 / (2π * 60.0 * 4.70 * 10^(-6))

  ≈ 56.650 Ω

Now, let's calculate the impedance:

Z = √(R² + (Xl - Xc)²)

  = √(216² + (75.398 - 56.650)²)

  ≈ √(46656 + 353.4106)

  ≈ √(46909.4106)

  ≈ 216.588 Ω

Therefore, the impedance of the circuit is approximately 216.588 Ω.

To find the average power dissipated in the circuit, we can use the formula:

P = Vrms² / Z

Where:

P is the average power

Vrms is the rms voltage

Z is the impedance

Given:

Vrms = 115 V

Let's calculate the average power:

P = (115²) / 216.588

  ≈ 61.083 W

Therefore, the average power dissipated in the circuit is approximately 61.083 W.

The peak current (Ipeak) through the resistor is the same as the rms current, which can be calculated using Ohm's Law:

Ipeak = Vrms / R

      = 115 / 216

      ≈ 0.532 A

Therefore, the peak current through the resistor is approximately 0.532 A.

The peak voltage across the inductor (Vpeak) can be calculated using the formula:

Vpeak = Ipeak * Xl

      = 0.532 * 75.398

      ≈ 40.057 V

Therefore, the peak voltage across the inductor is approximately 40.057 V.

The peak voltage across the capacitor (Vpeak) can be calculated using the formula:

Vpeak = Ipeak * Xc

      = 0.532 * 56.650

      ≈ 30.117 V

Therefore, the peak voltage across the capacitor is approximately 30.117 V.

When the circuit is in resonance, the inductive reactance (Xl) and capacitive reactance (Xc) are equal, and their sum becomes zero. The resonance frequency (fr) can be calculated using the formula:

fr = 1 / (2π√(LC))

Given:

L = 0.200 H

C = 4.70 μF

Let's calculate the resonance frequency:

fr = 1 / (2π√(LC))

    = 1 / (2π√(0.200 * 4.70 * 10^(-6)))

    ≈ 148.752 Hz

Therefore, the new resonance frequency is approximately 148.752 Hz.

Learn more about impedance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30475674

#SPJ11

(a) The capacitance of the parallel-plate capacitor is approximately 7.42 pF.(b) The charge stored on the plates is approximately 2.37 nC.(c) The electric field between the plates is approximately 888.89 N/C.

(a) The capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor can be calculated using the formula C = ε₀A/d, where ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity, A is the area of the plates, and d is the plate separation. Substituting the given values, we find C ≈ 7.42 pF.

(b) The charge stored on the plates can be determined using the formula Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage across the capacitor. Substituting the given values, we find Q ≈ 2.37 nC.

(c) The electric field between the plates can be calculated using the formula E = V/d, where E is the electric field, V is the voltage, and d is the plate separation. Substituting the given values, we find E ≈ 888.89 N/C.

(d) The magnitude of the charge density on each plate can be determined by dividing the charge stored on the plates by the area of each plate. Since the charge is evenly distributed on the plates, the charge density on each plate is the same. Substituting the given values, we find the magnitude of the charge density on each plate is approximately 16.93 μC/m².

(e) When the plates are moved farther apart without disconnecting the battery, the capacitance increases because the plate separation increases. The charge stored on the plates decreases because the voltage remains constant while the capacitance increases. The electric field between the plates decreases because the voltage is divided by the increased plate separation. The magnitude of the charge density on each plate remains the same because it depends on the charge stored on the plates, which does not change unless the battery is disconnected.

Learn more about capacitance here:

https://brainly.com/question/31871398

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

To arrange the letters to show the path of the light ray as it travels from the object to the viewer's eye, the correct order is:

D → C → E → B → A

This sequence represents the path of the light ray starting from position D, then moving to position C, followed by E, B, and finally A.

The angle of refraction θ2 with respect to the surface is 45.76°.Therefore, the correct option is (A) 68.1 ∘.

When a ray of light travels from one medium to another, it bends, this is known as refraction. The angle of refraction is given by Snell's law that states that the ratio of the sine of the angle of incidence to the sine of the angle of refraction is equal to the ratio of the refractive indices of the two media.

Here, the incident ray of light is traveling in transparent material 1 with an index of refraction n1=1.20. It makes an angle θ1=51.0∘ with the normal to a flat interface with transparent material 2, which has an index of refraction n2=1.70.Now, we need to find the angle of refraction θ2.The correct option is (A) 68.1 ∘

According to Snell's law, we can write that,n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2n1=1.20, θ1=51.0∘, n2=1.70Let's put these values in Snell's law and calculate the value of θ2.n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2sin θ2 = n1 / n2 sin θ1sin θ2 = 1.20 / 1.70 sin 51.0sin θ2 = 0.70sin θ2 = sin -1 (0.70)θ2 = 44.24°The angle of refraction is θ2 = 44.24°.

However, this angle is measured with respect to the normal. But the question asks about the angle of refraction with respect to the surface, which is given by (90 - θ2) = (90 - 44.24) = 45.76°.

Therefore, the angle of refraction θ2 with respect to the surface is 45.76°.Therefore, the correct option is (A) 68.1 ∘.

Learn more about refraction here,

https://brainly.com/question/27932095

#SPJ11

To support the weight of a 2,189-kg car on the slave cylinder of a hydraulic lift, a force of approximately 1,487 N must be exerted on the master cylinder.

The hydraulic lift operates based on Pascal's principle, which states that pressure applied to an enclosed fluid is transmitted undiminished to all parts of the fluid and the walls of the container. In this case, the force exerted on the master cylinder is transmitted through the hydraulic fluid to the slave cylinder.

First, we need to calculate the area of each cylinder. The area of a circle is given by the formula A = πr^2, where r is the radius. The diameter of the master cylinder is 1.7 cm, so the radius is half of that, which is 0.85 cm or 0.0085 m. Thus, the area of the master cylinder is A_master = π(0.0085 m)^2.

Similarly, the diameter of the slave cylinder is 25 cm, so the radius is 12.5 cm or 0.125 m. The area of the slave cylinder is A_slave = π(0.125 m)^2.

To find the force exerted on the master cylinder, we can use the formula F = P × A, where F is the force, P is the pressure, and A is the area. Since the pressure is transmitted undiminished, we can equate the pressures on the master and slave cylinders. Therefore, P_master × A_master = P_slave × A_slave.

Rearranging the equation, we get P_master = (P_slave × A_slave) / A_master. The weight of the car is given by the formula W = m × g, where m is the mass and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2).

Substituting the values, we have W = 2,189 kg × 9.8 m/s^2.

Now, we can solve for P_slave using the equation P_slave = W / A_slave. Plugging in the known values, we calculate P_slave.

Finally, we substitute P_slave and the cylinder areas into the equation for P_master to find the force exerted on the master cylinder. The result is approximately 1,487 N.

Learn more about Pascal's principle:

https://brainly.com/question/30258629

#SPJ11

Starting from rest at the top of a frictionless inclined plane, a block takes 2 s to slide down to the bottom The incline angle is 0, where sin 0 = 3/4 and cos 0 = 2/3.  Thus, the length of the inclined plane is 20 m

The given incline angle is θ = 0 where sin θ = 3/4 and cos θ = 2/3 and the block slides down without any friction.

We are to find out the length of the inclined plane.

Let L be the length of the inclined plane, and g be the acceleration due to gravity.

As per the given statement, the block takes 2 seconds to slide down to the bottom of the inclined plane.

The acceleration of the block will be the same as the acceleration due to gravity in the direction of the inclined plane.

Therefore, the time t it takes for the block to slide down the incline plane of length L, starting from rest at the top of the inclined plane, is given by;         L = 1/2gt² (since initial velocity, u = 0)At θ = 0, sin θ = 3/4 and cos θ = 2/3.

Therefore, the length of the inclined plane is; L = 1/2 × 9.8 m/s² × (2 s)² = 19.6 m

Thus, the length of the inclined plane is 20 m (approximated to one significant figure).Hence, the correct option is (e) 20 m.

Learn more about friction here:

https://brainly.com/question/13000653

#SPJ11

The mass of the sphere is 15.48 kg.

Given,The density of the sphere = 10,775 kg/m³

Diameter of the sphere = 14 cm

The diameter of the sphere can be used to find its radius.

The formula to find the radius of a sphere is, Radius (r) = Diameter (d) / 2= 14 cm / 2= 7 cm

We can use the formula to find the volume of the sphere:

Volume of sphere = 4/3 πr³

The formula for mass is,

Mass (m) = Volume (V) × Density (ρ)

Therefore,Mass (m) = 4/3 × πr³ × ρ

Substitute the values and solve the equation.Mass (m) = 4/3 × π × (7 cm)³ × (10,775 kg/m³)

Remember to convert cm to m because the density is given in kilograms per meter cube.

1 cm = 0.01 m

Volume (V) = 4/3 × π × (7 cm)³= 4/3 × π × (0.07 m)³= 1.437 × 10⁻³ m³

Mass (m) = Volume (V) × Density (ρ)= 1.437 × 10⁻³ m³ × 10,775 kg/m³= 15.48 kg

Therefore, the mass of the sphere is 15.48 kg.

Know more about Mass here,

https://brainly.com/question/30940568

#SPJ11

The present activity in mCi is 3.75 x 10⁵ mCi. It has 1.50 mci activity from 27.19 years.

A ²²Na source is labeled 1.50 mCi, but its present activity is found to be 1.39 x 10⁷ Bq.

(a) Present activity in mCi:

1 mCi = 37 MBq

So, 1.39 x 10⁷ Bq = 1.39 x 10⁷/37

mCi= 3.75 x 10⁵ mCi.

(b) Decay equation: A = A₀e⁻ᵦᵗwhere, A₀ = initial activity, A = present activity, t = time, and β = decay constant or disintegration constant.

Radioactive decay is first-order, so its decay constant is given by the equation:

β = 0.693/T₁/₂

where, T₁/₂ = half-life of ²²Na.

Half-life of ²²Na is 2.6 years.

So,

β = 0.693/2.6 = 0.2666 year⁻¹.

Using the decay equation:

A₀ = A/e⁻ᵦᵗ

A₀ = 1.50 mCi, A = 3.75 x 10⁵ mCi, and β = 0.2666 year⁻¹.

Substituting these values in the above equation and solving for t, we get:

t = [ln (A₀/A)]/β= [ln (1.50/3.75 x 10⁵)]/0.2666

= 27.19 years

Therefore, the ²²Na source had a 1.50 mCi activity 27.19 years ago.

Present activity in mCi = 3.75 x 10⁵ mCi

It has 1.50 mci activity from 27.19 years.

Learn more about decay at: https://brainly.com/question/9932896

#SPJ11

The period of the pendulum in the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry is approximately 8.97 seconds. The period of a pendulum can be calculated using the formula:

T = 2π√(L/g)

Where:

T is the period of the pendulum,

L is the length of the pendulum, and

g is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this case, the length of the pendulum is given as 20 m, and the acceleration due to gravity is 9.803 m/s².

Plugging in these values into the formula, we can calculate the period:

T = 2π√(20/9.803)

T ≈ 2π√2.039

T ≈ 2π(1.428)

T ≈ 8.97 seconds

Therefore, the period of the pendulum in the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry is approximately 8.97 seconds.

To know more about gravity

brainly.com/question/31321801

#SPJ11

The energy now stored if the capacitor was disconnected from the potential source before the separation of the plates was changed is 6.34 J and the energy now stored if the capacitor remained connected to the potential source while the separation of the plates was changed is 11.20 J.

Energy stored in vacuum capacitor (U₁) = 6.34 JInitial separation between the plates (d₁) = 3.90 mm

Final separation between the plates (d₂) = 1.50 mm

Part A: If the capacitor was disconnected from the potential source before the separation of the plates was changed, then the energy stored will remain constant as the charge stored in the capacitor will not change.

Thus, Energy stored in the capacitor after changing the separation of the plates = 6.34 J.

Part B: If the capacitor remained connected to the potential source while the separation of the plates was changed, then the charge stored in the capacitor will increase as the capacitance of the capacitor is inversely proportional to the distance between the plates

i.e., as the separation decreases the capacitance increases.

The formula to find the capacitance of the capacitor is given by,C = ε₀A/d

Where C is the capacitance, A is the area of each plate, d is the separation between the plates, and ε₀ is the permittivity of free space.

The energy stored in the capacitor can be given as,U = 1/2 CV²where V is the potential difference between the plates

Substituting the value of C in the above equation, we get:U = (ε₀A/2d) V²As the capacitor remains connected to the potential source, the potential difference between the plates will also remain constant and equal to the potential difference provided by the potential source.

Now, the capacitance after changing the separation of the plates can be calculated as:C' = ε₀A/d₂

Substituting the values of A, d₁ and d₂ in the above equation, we get:C' = 8.854 x 10⁻¹² x 0.003²/0.0015C' = 3.542 x 10⁻¹⁰ F

The energy stored in the capacitor after changing the separation of the plates can be calculated as:U' = (ε₀A/2d₂) V²Substituting the values of A, d₂ and V in the above equation,

we get:U' = (8.854 x 10⁻¹² x 0.003²/2 x 0.0015) (V)²U' = 1.77 (V)²

Therefore, the energy now stored if the capacitor remained connected to the potential source while the separation of the plates was changed is 1.77 times the initial energy stored i.e.,U' = 1.77 x 6.34U' = 11.20 J.

Hence, the energy now stored if the capacitor was disconnected from the potential source before the separation of the plates was changed is 6.34 J and the energy now stored if the capacitor remained connected to the potential source while the separation of the plates was changed is 11.20 J.

Learn more about capacitor  here:

https://brainly.com/question/31627158

#SPJ11

The quantity represented by the number 1 in the diagram is x = distance from the central bright fringe to the next bright fringe and the quantity represented by the number 2 in the diagram is d = distance between the two slits.

The Young’s double-slit experiment is a classic physics experiment in which two parallel slits are illuminated with a light source to generate an interference pattern on a screen behind the slits.

The diagram shown below represents a bright fringe pattern generated by a double-slit arrangement:

Figure shows double slit diffraction pattern.

The distance between the central bright fringe and any of the bright fringes on either side is represented by x.

Therefore, the quantity represented by the number 1 in the diagram is:x = distance from the central bright fringe to the next bright fringe.

The distance between the two slits is represented by d. Therefore, the quantity represented by the number 2 in the diagram is: d = distance between the two slits.

Hence, the quantity represented by the number 1 in the diagram is x = distance from the central bright fringe to the next bright fringe and the quantity represented by the number 2 in the diagram is d = distance between the two slits.

Learn more about Young’s double-slit  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29885741

#SPJ11

A truck drives 39 kilometers in 20 minutes. The truck could have traveled 6.67 kilometers (km) in 20 minutes if it was accelerating at 2 m/s².

Given that a truck drives 39 kilometers in 20 minutes.

We are supposed to determine how far could the truck have traveled (in units of kilometers) in 20 minutes if it was accelerating at 2 m/s².

We have to convert the acceleration to kilometers per minute.1 m/s² = 60m/1 min²1 m/min² = 1/60 m/s²2 m/s² = (2/60) m/min² = 1/30 m/min²

Now, we need to find the distance d that the truck travels during the 20 minutes of acceleration.

We know that the initial velocity is zero and that the acceleration is 1/30 m/min².

We can use the following kinematic equation to find the distance traveled: d = (1/2)at²

where d is the distance, a is the acceleration, and t is the time. Since the acceleration is in m/min², the time t needs to be in minutes. Therefore, t = 20 minutes.

d = (1/2)(1/30)(20)²d = (1/60)(400)d = 6.67 km

The truck could have traveled 6.67 kilometers (km) in 20 minutes if it was accelerating at 2 m/s².

Learn more about kinematic equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/24458315

#SPJ11

The inductance of the inductor is the option is D) 86H.

Given data:Resonance frequency f = 8.92 HzResistance R = 138 ΩCapacitance C = 3.7 μFWe need to find out the inductance L of the inductor. At resonance frequency, the capacitive reactance Xc = Inductive reactance XlThus, we can write;Xc = XlOr, 1 / (2πfC) = 2πfLor, L = 1 / (4π²f²C)Now, putting the values of f and C;L = 1 / (4π² × 8.92² × 3.7 × 10⁻⁶)≈ 86H.

Thus, the correct option is D) 86H.Note:In an LRC circuit, L stands for inductor or coil, R stands for resistor and C stands for the capacitor.

Learn more about inductor here,

https://brainly.com/question/4425414

#SPJ11

The equivalent resistance of this combination of resistors is 2.3Ω, option c.

Three resistors, 4.0-Ω, 8.0-Ω, 16-Ω, are connected in parallel in a circuit.

The equivalent resistance of this combination of resistors is given by the following formula:

1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3

Here

R1 = 4.0-Ω,

R2 = 8.0-Ω,

R3 = 16-Ω

Hence, substituting the values, we get;

1/R = 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16

Adding the above three fractions, we get;

1/R = (2 + 1 + 0.5) / 8= 3.5/8

∴ R = 8/3.5Ω ≈ 2.29Ω ≈ 2.3Ω

Therefore, the equivalent resistance of this combination of resistors is 2.3Ω.

Hence, option C is the correct answer.

Learn more about resistance:

https://brainly.com/question/30901006

#SPJ11

The instantaneous direction of the electric field at point P, indicated on the diagramthe correct option is (B) to the left.

The instantaneous direction of the electric field at point P, indicated on the diagram is towards the left.What is an electromagnetic wave?Electromagnetic waves are waves that are produced by the motion of electric charges.

Electromagnetic waves can travel through a vacuum or a material medium. Electromagnetic waves include radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, ultraviolet radiation, X-rays, and gamma rays.

In an electromagnetic wave, the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other, and both are perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation. At any given point and time, the electric and magnetic fields oscillate perpendicular to each other and the direction of wave propagation.

They are both sinusoidal, with a frequency equal to that of the wave.The instantaneous direction of the electric field at point P, indicated on the diagram is towards the left. When the magnetic field is pointing out of the page, the electric field is pointing towards the left. Thus, the correct option is (B) to the left.

The given electromagnetic wave is shown at some snapshot in time as it propagates to the right in a vacuum at speed c. Point P is a point in space where the electric field vector is to be determined. This point can be any point in space, and is shown in the diagram as a dot, for example.

To know more about electromagnetic

https://brainly.com/question/21317144

#SPJ11

a) The moment of inertia for the bowling ball is 0.0144 kg·m².

b) The rotational speed of the ball when it reaches the bottom of the ramp is approximately 1555 RPM.

a) To calculate the moment of inertia for the solid sphere (bowling ball), we can use the formula:

I = (2/5) * m * r^2

where I is the moment of inertia, m is the mass of the sphere, and r is the radius of the sphere.

Given:

Mass of the bowling ball (m) = 5 kg

Diameter of the sphere (d) = 12 cm = 0.12 m

First, we need to calculate the radius (r) of the sphere:

r = d/2 = 0.12 m / 2 = 0.06 m

Now, we can calculate the moment of inertia:

I = (2/5) * 5 kg * (0.06 m)^2

I = (2/5) * 5 kg * 0.0036 m^2

I = 0.0144 kg·m²

b) To find the rotational speed of the ball when it reaches the bottom of the ramp, we can use the conservation of energy principle. The initial potential energy (mgh) of the ball at the top of the ramp is converted into both kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2) and rotational kinetic energy (1/2 I ω²) at the bottom of the ramp.

Given:

Height of the ramp (h) = 6 m

Final linear speed of the ball (v) = 10 m/s

Moment of inertia of the ball (I) = 0.0144 kg·m²

Using the conservation of energy equation:

mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)I ω²

Since the ball starts from rest, the initial rotational speed (ω) is 0.

mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)I ω²

mgh = (1/2)mv^2

6 m * 9.8 m/s² = (1/2) * 5 kg * (10 m/s)² + (1/2) * 0.0144 kg·m² * ω²

Simplifying the equation:

58.8 J = 250 J + 0.0072 kg·m² * ω²

0.0072 kg·m² * ω² = 58.8 J - 250 J

0.0072 kg·m² * ω² = -191.2 J

Since the rotational speed (ω) is in rotations per minute (RPM), we need to convert the energy units to Joules:

1 RPM = (2π/60) rad/s

1 J = 1 kg·m²/s²

Converting the units:

0.0072 kg·m² * ω² = -191.2 J

ω² = -191.2 J / 0.0072 kg·m²

ω² ≈ -26555.56 rad²/s²

Taking the square root of both sides:

ω ≈ ± √(-26555.56 rad²/s²)

ω ≈ ± 162.9 rad/s

Since the speed is positive and the ball is rolling in a particular direction, we take the positive value:

ω ≈ 162.9 rad/s

Now, we can convert the rotational speed to RPM:

1 RPM = (2π/60) rad/s

ω_RPM = (ω * 60) / (2π)

ω_RPM = (162.9 * 60) / (2π)

ω_RPM ≈ 1555 RPM

To know more aout moment of inertia

https://brainly.com/question/30051108

#SPJ11

A larger cross-sectional area would allow for a higher rate of diffusion, while a smaller cross-sectional area would restrict the diffusion rate. The cross-sectional area of the pipe, we can use the equation for Fick's Law of diffusion, which relates the rate of diffusion of a substance to the diffusion constant, the concentration gradient, and the cross-sectional area.

Fick's Law equation:

Rate of Diffusion = (Diffusion Constant) x (Cross-sectional Area) x (Concentration Gradient)

In this case, the rate of diffusion is given as 11.7 x[tex]10^(-4)[/tex]kg, the diffusion constant is 2.13 x [tex]10^(-5) m^2/s[/tex], and the concentration gradient can be calculated as the difference between the concentration in the tank and the concentration in the atmosphere (which is typically zero).

First, we need to calculate the concentration gradient. The concentration in the tank can be found by multiplying the density of the gas by the length of the pipe:

Concentration in Tank = Density x Length = 0.798 [tex]kg/m^3[/tex]x 1.94 m

Next, we can calculate the concentration gradient:

Concentration Gradient = Concentration in Tank - Concentration in Atmosphere = Concentration in Tank - 0

Now, we can substitute the given values into the Fick's Law equation:

Rate of Diffusion = (2.13 x [tex]10^(-5) m^2/s[/tex]) x (Cross-sectional Area) x (Concentration in Tank)

We can rearrange the equation to solve for the cross-sectional area:

Cross-sectional Area = (Rate of Diffusion) / [(Diffusion Constant) x (Concentration in Tank)]

By substituting the given values, we can calculate the cross-sectional area of the pipe. The cross-sectional area of the pipe represents the area through which the gas can diffuse

Learn more about Fick's Law here:

https://brainly.com/question/13799466

#SPJ11

The total charge stored in a parallel plate capacitance with circular faces, a diameter of 7.7 cm, and an air gap of 1.8 mm, charged with a 12.0 V emf, can be calculated.

The capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor is given by the equation C = ε₀A/d. In this case, the circular plates have a diameter of 7.7 cm, so the radius (r) is half of that, which is 3.85 cm or 0.0385 m. The area of each plate can be calculated using A = πr².

Once we have the capacitance, we can use the equation Q = CV to find the total charge stored in the capacitor. Here, Q represents the charge and V is the emf or voltage applied to the capacitor.

By substituting the values into the equation, calculate the total charge stored in the capacitor. Remember to consider the units of the given values and use consistent units throughout the calculations to obtain the correct numerical answer.

In conclusion, the total charge stored in the parallel plate capacitor can be determined by calculating the capacitance and using the equation Q = CV, where Q is the charge and V is the emf or voltage applied to the capacitor.

Learn more about capacitance here;

https://brainly.com/question/30529897

#SPJ11

The appropriate letters for each solution are:

0.18 m [tex]FeSO_4[/tex]: This solution contains [tex]FeSO_4[/tex], which dissociates into [tex]Fe_2[/tex]+ and [tex]SO_4[/tex]²- ions. Since it is an electrolyte, it will lower the freezing point more than a non-electrolyte. Therefore, it would have the:

D. Highest freezing point

0.17 m [tex]NH_4NO_3[/tex]: This solution contains [tex]NH_4NO_3[/tex], which also dissociates into [tex]NH_4[/tex]+ and [tex]NO_3[/tex]- ions. Being an electrolyte, it will have a lower freezing point compared to a non-electrolyte, but higher than the solution in (1). Therefore, it would have the:

C. Third lowest freezing point

0.15 m KI: This solution contains KI, which dissociates into K+ and I- ions. Like the previous solutions, it is an electrolyte and will lower the freezing point. However, its concentration is lower than the solutions in (1) and (2). Therefore, it would have the:

B. Second lowest freezing point

0.39 m Urea (nonelectrolyte): Urea is a non-electrolyte, meaning it does not dissociate into ions in solution. Non-electrolytes generally have higher freezing points compared to electrolytes. Therefore, it would have the:

A. Lowest freezing point

To know more about freezing point, here

brainly.com/question/31357864

#SPJ4

Therefore, the mass of the Sun is 1.99 x 1030 kg.

Given that the centre of the Earth is a distance of 1.50×1011 m away from the centre of the Sun, and it takes 365 days for Earth to orbit the Sun once. We are to find the mass of the Sun. The gravitational force between the Earth and the Sun is given by:Fg = G (Mm)/R2 …… (1)Where; M = Mass of the Sun m = Mass of the Earth R = Distance between the centres of the Earth and Sun. G = Universal gravitational constant. We know that Earth takes 365 days to complete one revolution around the Sun. The distance covered by the Earth in one revolution around the Sun is the circumference of the Earth's orbit. Circumference = 2πR ….. (2)The time taken to complete one revolution = 365 days = 365 × 24 × 60 × 60 seconds. Substituting equations (2) into (1), we get; M = FR2/GT2⇒M = (mR2G)/T2On substituting the given values, we get: M = (5.97 x 1024 kg x (1.50 x 1011 m)2 x 6.6743 x 10-11 N m2/kg2)/(365 x 24 x 60 x 60 s)2= 1.99 x 1030 kg. Therefore, the mass of the Sun is 1.99 x 1030 kg.

To know more about Sun visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14538663

#SPJ11

The origins of two frames coincide at t = t' = 0 and the relative speed is 0.996c.

Two micrometeorites collide at coordinates x = 101 km and t = 157 μs according to an observer in frame S. We need to find the spatial and temporal coordinate of the collision according to an observer in frame S'.

x = 101 km, t = 157 μs

According to the observer in frame S', the relative velocity of frame S with respect to frame S' is u = v = 0.996c.

Let us apply the Lorentz transformation to the given values.

Lorentz transformation of length is given by, L' = L-√(1-u^2/c^2) Here, L = 101 km and u = 0.996c. We know that, c = 3 × 10^8 m/s.

Lorentz transformation of time is given by, T' = T-uX*c^2√(1-u^2/c^2)

Here, T = 157 μs, X = 101 km and u = 0.996c. We know that, c = 3 × 10^8 m/s.

Now, substituting the values in the above equations: L'=33.89 km

Hence, the spatial coordinate of the collision according to an observer in frame S' is 33.89 km.

The temporal coordinate of the collision according to an observer in frame S' is given by, T' = T-uX*c^2√1-u^2*c^2

Substituting the values of T, X and u, we get T' = -92.14μs

Hence, the temporal coordinate of the collision according to an observer in frame S' is -92.14 μs.

Learn further about related topics: https://brainly.com/question/31072444

#SPJ11

The larger piston can lift a weight of 1686.42 N

The ratio of the diameter of the larger piston to the diameter of the smaller piston is 12: 1. So the ratio of the area of the larger piston to the area of the smaller piston will be (12/1)² : 1² = 144:1.

Therefore, the larger piston can lift a weight that is 144 times heavier than the weight placed on the smaller piston. Now, the smaller piston has a surface area of: (1/2)²π = 0.785 sq cm. So, if the 30 kg boy puts his entire weight on the small plunger, then the force exerted on the small plunger will be 30 kg x 9.8 m/s² = 294 N. And, this force will act over the surface area of the small plunger.

Thus, the pressure in the system will be: Pressure = Force / Area of the small piston = 294 N / 0.785 sq cm = 374.52 N/sq cm. And, this pressure will be transmitted uniformly throughout the hydraulic system.

Finally, using the formula: Pressure = Force / Area of the large piston, we can calculate the weight that the larger piston can lift.

So, the weight that the larger piston can lift will be:

Force = Pressure x Area of the large piston = 374.52 N/sq cm x (6 cm)²π / 4 = 1686.42 N.

So, the larger piston can lift a weight of 1686.42 N if the diameters of both pistons are 1 cm and 12 cm.

Know more about weight here,

https://brainly.com/question/31659519

#SPJ11