For this assignment, you will write three body paragraphs for an essay that explains the important role Harriet Tubman played in the Underground Railroad. Your paragraphs should support this thesis statement:

Harriet Tubman played an important role in the Underground Railroad.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all of the questions complete.
Review the Encyclopedia Britannica article "Harriet Tubman." Take notes about three facts from the article that you think may be useful for your essay.

Write three body paragraphs for an essay explaining Harriet Tubman's role in the Underground Railroad. Each of your body paragraphs should contain a topic sentence, at least three relevant supporting details, and a concluding sentence that wraps up the ideas of the paragraph. Each paragraph should answer one of these questions:

Paragraph 1: What was the Underground Railroad, and whom did it serve?
Paragraph 2: Who was Harriet Tubman?
Paragraph 3: How did Harriet Tubman play an important role in the Underground Railroad?

The greatest  influence on modern Western Civilization was Greek individualism. Option c

Greek individualism was a philosophical concept that emphasized the importance of the individual as a unique and autonomous entity with the ability to reason and make decisions independently of society and tradition. It emerged in Ancient Greece during the classical period and was a significant departure from the earlier tribal and collective values of Greek society.

The Greek concept of individualism is often associated with the ideas of famous philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, who emphasized the importance of individual moral responsibility, personal excellence, and the pursuit of knowledge and virtue. These thinkers argued that individuals should strive to develop their own unique talents and abilities, and that this pursuit would ultimately benefit society as a whole.

Read more on individualism here:https://brainly.com/question/18405002

#SPJ1

The appropriate word to describe the separation between the pals is four steps.

To determine this

Shaunte took 8 steps in the opposite direction while Joy took 12 steps ahead. The sentence would be: "We can add the amount of steps the two buddies walked to calculate the distance between them."

12 + (-8)

= 12 - 8 = 4

Hence, four steps is the appropriate word to use to describe the separation between the buddies.

The arrows in front of Shaunte's steps show that she is walking backward, and the arrows in front of Joy's steps show that she is walking ahead.

The entire distance that each friend walked was determined, and depending on which direction they walked, these distances were then added or subtracted to get the distance between the friends. This is an illustration of how to find the net displacement between two objects using vector addition and subtraction. The distance between the pals in this instance represents the net displacement.

To know more about vector , click the below link

brainly.com/question/12937011

#SPJ9

The reforms of the Gracchi brothers were met with mixed reactions from the people of Rome. On the one hand, their reforms helped to address many of the social and economic problems that were plaguing Rome at the time, such as widespread poverty and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small elite.

However, their reforms also faced significant opposition from powerful individuals and groups within Roman society, particularly among the conservative senatorial class who saw the Gracchi brothers as a threat to their own power and authority.

Despite this opposition, the Gracchi brothers were able to achieve some significant reforms during their time in office, including the establishment of a system of subsidized grain distribution to the urban poor, the redistribution of public land to small farmers, and the extension of Roman citizenship to non-elite groups.

Overall, the legacy of the Gracchi brothers remains a subject of debate among historians, with most seeing them as heroic champions of the rights of the common people.

To learn more about the Gracchi brothers reforms, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2411878

Answer:

Option 1

Explanation:

The change that occurred in America between 1800 and 1850 was the improvement in transportation, which linked regions together economically.

The expression "wage and price control" completes the picture for economic planning.

Economic planning is a computational procedure-based resource allocation mechanism for solving a constrained maximization problem in an iterative process to obtain its solution. Planning is a mechanism for allocating resources between and within an organization, as opposed to a market mechanism.

As a socialist allocation mechanism, economic planning replaces the factor market with a process of directly allocating resources within a series of interconnected social organizations that together constitute the economy's production apparatus.

There are various forms of economic planning that differ according to their specific procedures and approaches. The degree of centralization or decentralization in decision making depends on the specific type of planning mechanism used. You can also distinguish between centralized and distributed planning.

An economy that is primarily based on planning is known as a planned economy. In a centrally planned economy, resource allocation is determined by a comprehensive production plan that sets production requirements. Planning can also take the form of directive planning within a market economy, where governments use market instruments to induce independent firms to achieve their development goals. 

Know more about economic planning here:

https://brainly.com/question/30158414

#SPJ1

The earliest civilizations developed around the same time in different parts of the world. Two of the most notable civilizations were those of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations.

Civilizations are complex societies that have developed over a long period of time, often through the exchange of ideas, technology and resources. They are marked by a number of characteristics, including the development of cities, states, and empires, the emergence of organized religions, the growth of trade and commerce, the use of writing, and the development of scientific knowledge and technology.

The earliest civilizations developed around the same time in different parts of the world. Two of the most notable civilizations were those of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations.

The Mesopotamian civilization developed in the region of modern-day Iraq, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This civilization was based on agriculture, which was made possible by the rivers.

The Egyptian civilization developed along the banks of the Nile river. This civilization was also based on agriculture, and their political system was a monarchy.

Both of these civilizations had complex political, social, economic and religious/philosophical systems that developed over time and allowed them to thrive. They were both based on agriculture and trade, and had complex religious and philosophical systems. They both had monarchies as their political systems, and the religion and philosophy of both civilizations was polytheistic.

To learn more about civilizations

https://brainly.com/question/25138480

#SPJ1

President William McKinley used a "front porch campaign" from his home, by delivering speeches and meeting with supporters who traveled to see him. This approach is believed to have helped him win the election.

A front porch campaign is a type of political campaign where a candidate conducts most of their campaigning from their own home, typically sitting on their front porch to address supporters and give speeches.

It was this type of campaign approach that President William used likely to avoid the expenses related to traveling around the country to campaign, and it is believed to have ultimately aided him in securing a win in the election.

You can learn more about President William McKinley's approach here https://brainly.com/question/2704309

#SPJ1

You've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided some information about the front porch campaign approach.

Answer:

B) Articles written by authors known for exaggerating the facts, often not providing any evidence for their claims.

B) Articles written by authors known for exaggerating the facts, often not providing any evidence for their claims.

Yellow journalism refers to a style of journalism that is characterized by sensationalism, exaggeration, and often unethical practices such as the use of misleading headlines, fake news, and false information. It is typically associated with the late 19th and early 20th centuries when newspapers competed with each other to attract readership through sensational stories, often involving crime, scandal, and gossip.

Option B is the closest to the definition of yellow journalism, as it emphasizes the use of exaggerated and unsupported claims. Option A may describe opinion journalism, while options C and D are not accurate descriptions of yellow journalism.

Warfare involved close combat and the use of increasingly lethal and destructive weapons, causing unprecedented carnage and destruction.

Fighting since forever ago has been portrayed by its mercilessness and complete destruction. On the front line, fighters participated in close battle utilizing weapons like blades, lances, and withdraws from appearance of explosive. With the presentation of guns, fights turned out to be more deadly and horrendous, as troopers could draw in their adversaries from more noteworthy distances. During The Second Great War, the utilization of automatic rifles, cannons, and compound weapons caused uncommon slaughter and obliteration. Troopers confronted steady risk from adversary fire, sickness, and openness to unforgiving conditions. The inescapable utilization of besieging strikes during The Second Great War added another degree of obliteration, as urban communities and regular citizen populaces became focuses for annihilation. Generally, fighting has been and keeps on being quite possibly of humankind's most pulverizing action.

To learn more about warfare and devastation, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30031250

The theory underpinned American territorial expansion in the 19th century and served as justification for the eviction of Native Americans or other ethnic groups from ancestral homes.

Either a voluntary or forced relocation took place. Patrols from the army and the militia watched the tribes' westward migration. And over 70,000 Native Americans are thought to have been transferred by the government between 1830 and 1840; thousands of them perished along the route that became known as that of the Trail of Tears. As more states were admitted to the Union as a result of the United States' rapid growth, the problem of slavery became more pressing and the Civil War eventually broke out.

To know more about Trail of Tears visit:

https://brainly.com/question/674671

#SPJ1

Answer: that mean someone who’s shoes touch muding

Explanation:

In a historic speech given yesterday, civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. addressed a crowd of more than 250,000 people at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C. King's speech was part of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, which was organized by a coalition of civil rights groups.

The event took place on August 28, 1963, and was attended by a diverse crowd of people from across the United States. The speech began at 3 pm and lasted for just over 16 minutes.

During his speech, King passionately spoke about the need for racial equality and justice in America, emphasizing that all people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. He called for an end to segregation and discrimination, urging Americans to come together in unity and love.

King's powerful words and eloquent delivery resonated deeply with the crowd, inspiring a new generation of civil rights activists and galvanizing support for the movement. The "I Have a Dream" speech, as it came to be known, remains one of the most iconic and influential speeches in American history, a testament to King's legacy as a champion of justice and equality.

Explanation:

Foreign trade has had both positive and negative impacts on small businesses in the United States.

On the positive side, foreign trade has opened up new markets for small businesses to sell their products and services. By exporting goods to other countries, small businesses can increase their customer base and potentially grow their revenue. Additionally, foreign trade can provide access to cheaper materials and products that can be used to manufacture goods, which can help small businesses to remain competitive.

However, foreign trade can also pose challenges for small businesses. Increased competition from foreign companies can make it difficult for small businesses to compete on price or quality. Small businesses may also face barriers to entry in foreign markets, such as high tariffs or regulations, which can make it difficult to expand overseas.

Moreover, small businesses may be more vulnerable to the effects of foreign trade policies, such as changes in tariffs or trade agreements. These policies can have a significant impact on small businesses' ability to import or export goods, and can result in increased costs or decreased demand for their products.

Therefore, the impact of foreign trade on small businesses in the United States is complex and multifaceted. While it can provide opportunities for growth and expansion, it can also pose challenges and risks. It is important for small businesses to stay informed about changes in foreign trade policies and to carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of engaging in foreign trade.

Protests, boycotts, sit-ins, civil disobedience, and alternative institutions are all tactics. It has been empirically demonstrated that nonviolent resistance is twice as effective as armed struggle in achieving  political objectives.

According to the findings, democratization is approximately ten times more likely to result from non-violent resistance than from violent resistance. As images of the confrontations sparked widespread public support for the movement's goals, nonviolent protests resulted in thousands of arrests. In the US South, hundreds of thousands more participated in marches, boycotts, and voter registration drives.

To amplify their voices, challenge power dynamics, and press for reform, individuals and organizations confronting restrictive, oppressive, or authoritarian forms of governance may be able to employ hundreds of nonviolent strategies. Through education and training in movement-building and strategic nonviolent action, the U.S. Institute of Peace encourages nonviolent strategies; applied research on such developments and the adequacy of outside help; and publications that assist policymakers in advancing nonviolent alternatives.

To learn more about Protests visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13667698

#SPJ1

The evolution of early civilizations continued over time. Civilizations were changed and affected by the environment, conflicts, and the movement of people and ideas. Even though some changes hurt civilizations.

Image result for Talk about the process by which the earliest civilizations developed into states and then empires. Include details about the characteristics of these ever-expanding regions. What were the various strategies utilized to control such a wide range of individuals .

Between 4000 and 3000 B.C.E., when agriculture and trade led to an abundance of food and economic stability, the earliest civilizations emerged. Since many people no longer needed to farm, a wide range of occupations and interests could flourish in a small area.

To learn more about civilizations visit :

https://brainly.com/question/12207844

#SPJ1

Answer:

Gadsden died before he could complete his railroad. The first transcontinental railroad was built farther north instead. A southern railroad across the land from the Gadsden Purchase was not completed until the 1880s.

Explanation:

Answer:

The other mass atrocities are similar to genocide in that they involve the intentional and systematic killing of a large group of people. These acts often involve the targeting of individuals based on their ethnicity, religion, or other identifying factors. Additionally, both genocide and other mass atrocities can involve the use of violence, torture, and other forms of cruelty in order to achieve their goals. The effects of both genocide and other mass atrocities can be long-lasting and have profound impacts on the individuals and communities affected. Ultimately, both genocide and other mass atrocities represent a grave violation of human rights and are considered to be among the most serious crimes that can be committed against a group of people.

Answer:To

the government of Karmin,

Firstly, I believe that each country's foreign policy goals should be tailored to its specific context and needs. While some countries may prioritize gaining power and influence overseas, others may focus on protecting their sovereignty and promoting economic development. In the case of Karmin, considering its current geopolitical situation, I would suggest that protecting sovereignty and promoting economic development should be the main foreign policy goals. Historical examples, such as the successful neutralism of Switzerland and Sweden, demonstrate that a policy of non-alignment and neutrality can enable a small country to maintain its independence and prosperity in a volatile international environment.

Secondly, regarding the question of alignment, I would recommend that Karmin adopts a policy of non-alignment and stays out of any military alliances such as NATO or the Warsaw Pact. The Unaligned Movement, which was formed during the Cold War as a coalition of non-aligned countries, could provide Karmin with a platform to pursue its interests and values without being dragged into any military conflicts or ideological battles. Historical examples, such as the successful non-alignment of India and Yugoslavia, suggest that a policy of neutrality and independence can be a viable and effective foreign policy strategy.

Finally, in terms of the type of foreign policy that Karmin should adopt toward the rest of the world, I would suggest a diplomatic and constructive approach. Instead of being aggressive or confrontational, Karmin should seek to build alliances and partnerships based on mutual interests and respect. Historical examples, such as the success of Finland's policy of active neutrality and dialogue in promoting peace and stability in the Baltic region, demonstrate that a diplomatic and constructive foreign policy can benefit both the country and the international community.

In conclusion, I believe that Karmin should prioritize protecting its sovereignty and promoting economic development, adopt a policy of non-alignment and neutrality, and pursue a diplomatic and constructive foreign policy toward the rest of the world. These strategies are based on historical examples and international relations theories and could help Karmin achieve its foreign policy goals and contribute to global peace and prosperity.

Explanation:

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was widely controversial at the time, as it forced the relocation of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River. Despite this, some Americans justified the act in several ways.

One of the most common justifications was that the removal of Native Americans was necessary for the survival of the United States of America. Supporters of this view argued that the expansion of white settlers into Native American lands was inevitable and that the only way to prevent conflict was to remove the tribes to a designated area. They believed that the relocation would allow for the continued growth of the United States and its economy. This justification was supported by some of the most powerful politicians of the day, including President Andrew Jackson, who famously said in his first State of the Union address, "The waves of population and civilization are rolling to the westward, and we now propose to acquire the countries occupied by the red men of the South and West by a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual."

Another justification for the Indian Removal Act was the belief that it would save Native Americans from harassment from whites and allow them to live in an area where they could govern themselves. Proponents of this view argued that Native Americans were being mistreated and displaced by white settlers and that relocation to Indian Territory would protect them from further harm. They believed that the arrangement would allow Native Americans to maintain their cultural traditions and govern themselves without interference from white authorities. This view was also supported by some Native American leaders, who saw the relocation as a way to avoid further conflict with white settlers.

However, there were also those who believed that Native Americans did not need land and that they could live anywhere. This view was based on the idea that land was a commodity that could be bought and sold, and that Native Americans did not have a legitimate claim to the land they inhabited. Supporters of this argument believed that Native Americans could live in any area that was not already claimed by white settlers, and that the Indian Removal Act was therefore justified. This view was often used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, as it suggested that they had no real rights to the land and that they could be moved at the will of the government.

In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified by some Americans on the grounds that it was necessary for the survival of the United States, would protect Native Americans from white harassment, and that Native Americans did not have a legitimate claim to land. Despite these justifications, the act remains a controversial and tragic chapter in American history. The forced relocation of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands caused immense suffering and loss of life, and it is a reminder of the dark side of American expansionism and the treatment of indigenous peoples.

European attempts to settle land in the Americas was the origins of racial slavery. The roots of European racism can be traced back to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the colonisation of new territory.

It is feasible to track the origin of perceptions of some as beneath them, primitive, archaic to those who defended enslavement. Slavery  made it possible for Europeans to expand into the continent of North America and for the modern financial system to emerge. The contemporary slave trade across the Atlantic is distinguished by its complete marginalization of the slave.  In both the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, an abundance of European thinkers elaborated on the premise of supremacy based on race. They created the legend of a people devoid of culture and past. Both Africans living on their own land and those held in slavery in the Americas and the Caribbean were targets of racial ideas.

Here is the complete question-

The roots of European racism can be traced back to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the colonisation of new territory.

What can the origins of racial slavery be linked to?

Learn more on Slavery   -

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

According to the "White Man's Burden" ideology, one supposed benefit of imperialism for other peoples is to teach them how to run their own government. This belief was based on the assumption that non-European societies were inherently inferior and lacked the skills and knowledge necessary to govern themselves effectively. The proponents of imperialism argued that European powers had a moral duty to intervene in the affairs of other societies in order to bring them the benefits of European civilization, including modern political institutions, education, and technology. The idea of teaching other races how to run their own government was often used as a justification for imperialism, but in practice, it often led to the subjugation and exploitation of colonized peoples.

Answer:

In an endeavor to benefit the home nation, Britain and its colonies carried out "triangular trade" during the colonial era by transporting products, people, and natural resources across the Atlantic Ocean. Wide-ranging effects of trade with the Europeans on Native American tribes included conflict, cultural change, and sickness.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Please mark me as Brainiest!

In the entire region, shipbuilding was a key industry, with the timber sector providing significant support. The largest fleet was based in Saint John, with Charlottetown coming in second.

For instance, Newfoundland was renowned for its fishing industry. The agriculture of Prince Edward Island was well-known. The shipping and coal mines of Nova Scotia were well-known. Throughout the middle of the 1800s, the Atlantic colonies' economies largely depended on forestry and shipbuilding, especially in New Brunswick.

The Atlantic provinces are made up of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland. The Atlantic provinces are made up of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland.

To Know more about significant support.

https://brainly.com/question/23413671

#SPJ1

The task of the appellate court is to determine whether or not the law was correctly applied in the trial court. Appeals courts have three judges and no jury.

In India, what exactly is an appeal court?

The ability of a court to hear/review a case decided by a lower court is referred to as appellate jurisdiction. Both the Supreme Court and the High Courts have appellate jurisdiction in India. They have the authority to reverse or uphold lower court rulings. The first appeal is made to an officer designated by the public authority as the First Appellate Authority within the public authority itself. The CPIO has less authority than the First Appellate Authority. The Central Information Commission will consider the second appeal.

To know more about judges visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1078357

#SPJ9

Answer:

According to Oakes, the reason why Frederick Douglass defended John Brown so adamantly after Brown's failed invasion of Harpers Ferry was because of option a) Douglass empathized with how John Brown was denounced and shunned by the North. Douglass believed that Brown was a man of principle who had acted on behalf of the enslaved people, and he felt that Brown's motives and intentions were honorable. Despite the fact that Brown's raid was unsuccessful, Douglass believed that it had galvanized anti-slavery sentiment and that it had exposed the hypocrisy of the North's claims to moral superiority.

According to Oakes, the reason why Frederick Douglass defended John Brown so adamantly after Brown's failed invasion of Harpers Ferry was Douglass empathized with how John Brown was denounced and shunned by the North. Thus, option a is correct.

The invasion of Harpers Ferry was an important event in the history of the United States that occurred on October 16-18, 1859. It was led by John Brown, an abolitionist who believed in the violent overthrow of slavery in the United States.

John Brown and a group of 21 men (including 5 African Americans) attacked the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). Brown hoped to capture the armory, seize its weapons, and use them to arm slaves for a rebellion against their owners.

However, the attack was quickly suppressed by local militia and federal troops led by Colonel Robert E. Lee, who was then a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army.

The raiders were surrounded and eventually forced to surrender. Several of Brown's men were killed, and ten were captured, including Brown himself. Brown and his co-conspirators were tried and convicted of treason, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection. Brown was hanged on December 2, 1859.

The invasion of Harpers Ferry was a significant event that further heightened tensions between the North and South, and is often cited as one of the events that led to the American Civil War.

Learn more about the invasion of Harpers Ferry here:

https://brainly.com/question/9739453

#SPJ2

Frank Abagnale, a former con artist turned security consultant, claims that it is relatively easy to obtain a fraudulent passport due to the lack of stringent security measures in place.

Abagnale's experience as a con artist involved him posing as a Pan Am pilot and using forged documents to travel the world. His claim is based on the idea that the security measures in place to prevent passport fraud are often weak and outdated, making it relatively easy for someone with the right knowledge and resources to obtain a fraudulent passport.

According to Abagnale, obtaining a fraudulent passport requires a few key steps:

Read more about Frank Abagnale

brainly.com/question/25684105

#SPJ1

Answer:

choosing senators through direct election

Explanation: