ctions: For the following
1. PART A: Which of the following describes the central claim of the text?

Hitler advocated several policies based on his extremist ideas, particularly those rooted in racial and national superiority. One key policy was the establishment of a totalitarian state, in which he could exercise absolute control over the population.

Hitler believed in the supremacy of the Aryan race and sought to create a pure German society by eliminating those he deemed "inferior." This led to the implementation of the Nuremberg Laws, which enforced racial segregation and discrimination against Jews, Romani people, and others.

Additionally, Hitler promoted aggressive expansionism to establish Lebensraum, or living space, for the Aryan race. This involved invading and occupying other countries, particularly in Eastern Europe, to provide resources and territory for the German population. This policy led to the outbreak of World War II and numerous war crimes.

For more such questions on Hitler, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/20891925

#SPJ11

The probable question may be:

What policies did hitler advocate based on those ideas?

The ethnic group known as Kashmiris in Punjab is one that has historically migrated from the Kashmir Valley and settled in the area. During the Dogra Hindu and Sikh era, many ethnic Kashmiri Muslims had fled the Kashmir Valley for the Punjab region.

Many Kashmiri peasants migrated to the Punjabi plains as a result of the heavy commodity taxes imposed by the Sikhs. These historical assertions from Kashmiri sources were supported by visitors from Europe.

Moorcroft, one of these European travelers, left the Valley in 1823 with the help of roughly 500 emigrants who crossed the Pir Panjal Pass with him.

The Kashmir Valley had a large-scale migration to the Punjab as a result of the 1833 famine, with the bulk of weavers departing Kashmir. For many generations, weavers lived in Punjabi cities like Jammu and Nurpur.

To know more about Kashmir regions, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/793994

#SPJ1

Answer: Tomas jefferson

Explanation:

Answer:

On July 21, 1861, the First Battle of Bull Run occurred in Manassas, Virginia. The Union forces, led by Brigadier General Irvin McDowell, were attempting to invade the Confederate capital of Richmond when they were met by Confederate forces under the command of General P.G.T. Beauregard. The battle was unexpected and chaotic, with both sides suffering heavy casualties. Despite some initial success, Union forces were ultimately defeated and forced to retreat back to Washington D.C.

The importance of the First Battle of Bull Run to the war effort cannot be overstated. This battle shattered the North's illusions that the war would be easily won and that the Confederate army was weak and disorganized. The defeat at Bull Run shook the North's confidence and sparked outrage among the general population. Many people were angry at the incompetence of McDowell and demanded a more decisive and competent leadership. The Union army was forced to regroup and rethink their strategy, while Confederate morale was boosted by their victory. The First Battle of Bull Run set the tone for the long and bloody conflict that was to come, and served as a wake-up call for both sides about the seriousness of the war.

The surrender of General Lee at the Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865, effectively ended the American Civil War. This act marked the defeat of the Confederacy and heralded the reestablishment of the Union. This event was crucial as it marked a critical step towards the abolishment of slavery.

The event chosen from Table 8.1 is the April 9, 1865, when Lee surrenders at Appomattox Court House. This event took place at the end of the American Civil War, and it involves the surrender of General Robert E. Lee to Union General Ulysses S. Grant. This historical event played an instrumental part in ending the Civil War, signifying the defeat of the Confederacy.

The circumstances leading up to the surrender at Appomattox were dire for the Confederate forces. After four years of grueling battle, the resources and manpower of the Confederacy had dwindled, and General Lee realized that further resistance would only result in more unnecessary bloodshed. Therefore, on April 9, 1865, Lee met with Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, to negotiate the terms of surrender.

The importance of Lee's surrender cannot be overstated. It effectively ended the Civil War, bringing a close to four years of devastating conflict that had torn the United States in two. As the Confederate forces were the major force opposing the Union, their collapse allowed for the reestablishment of the Union and paved the way for Reconstruction that sought to heal the wounds from the war and rebuild the southern states. Moreover, the surrender marked an integral step in abolishing slavery, a contentious issue that was a root cause of the Civil War.

https://brainly.com/question/35820573

#SPJ2

Answer:

1. How does Fitzerald use weather to set a tone of despair in this excerpt?

-

2. Why do you think Fitzgerald included the detail about a lady with ¨ermine trimmings¨?

-

3. Why do you think Fitzgerald show that his main character, Merlin Grainger, was feeling depressed? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.

-

4. What does the text tell you about the economy of New York at the time in which the book is set?

-

5. What type of person do you think Carlone will be? Why?

-

6. In what ways is Fitzgerald's writing similar to Wharton´s writing in the previous excerpt?

Haciendas were large estates in the Spanish colonial era that grew crops to supply local industries. Option (b)

The crops grown on haciendas varied depending on the region, but they typically included crops like sugarcane, coffee, tobacco, and grains. These crops were used to produce goods like sugar, rum, and textiles, which were sold locally or exported to other colonies or Europe.

Ranchos were typically used for raising livestock, particularly cattle, while fincas and quintas were more commonly associated with smaller agricultural holdings or country homes. Plantations, on the other hand, were large agricultural estates primarily associated with the production of cash crops like cotton, sugar, and tobacco in other parts of the colonial world, particularly in the Caribbean and the American South.

Learn more about colonial era

https://brainly.com/question/17616334

#SPJ4

Full Question: which large estates in the spanish colonial era grew crops to supply local industries?

Firstly, start by defining what is meant by "ancient civilizations" and what aspects of these civilizations modern-day society can learn from. You could consider areas such as politics, economics, social structures, culture, or technology.

Next, focus on the Ming Dynasty as a specific example of an ancient civilization that modern-day society can learn from. Consider its achievements in areas such as art, literature, science, and technology, as well as its political and social structures.

Provide examples and evidence to support your arguments. Use specific examples from the Ming Dynasty to illustrate your points.

Finally, consider potential counterarguments to your thesis, and address them in your essay. For example, some may argue that modern-day society is too different from ancient civilizations to draw meaningful comparisons.

Make sure to structure your essay clearly, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Use appropriate academic language and provide proper citations for any sources you use.

Remember to use the rubric provided to ensure that you address all the required elements of the essay prompt and meet the grading criteria. Good luck!

Answer:

As a Student, I can confirm that modern-day society can learn a lot from ancient civilizations. These ancient societies have left behind a wealth of knowledge, wisdom, and experiences that can be applied to contemporary life.

Here are some ways in which modern-day society can learn from ancient civilizations:

1. Sustainability: Ancient civilizations were often more sustainable than modern societies. They had to rely on the natural resources around them and develop ways to use those resources without depleting them. For example, the Mayans developed a complex system of irrigation and agriculture that allowed them to grow crops in the rainforest without destroying the ecosystem. Similarly, the Inca built terraces into the mountainside to prevent soil erosion and increase agricultural productivity. Modern society can learn from these practices and adopt more sustainable ways of living.

2. Community: Ancient civilizations placed a strong emphasis on community and social connections. They recognized that people are happier and healthier when they are surrounded by supportive relationships. For example, the Greeks had a strong sense of community and developed institutions like the agora (public square) and gymnasiums where people could gather and interact with one another. Similarly, the Native Americans had a deep respect for their elders and valued intergenerational connections. Modern society can learn from these practices and prioritize community building.

3. Spirituality: Many ancient civilizations had a deep spiritual connection with nature and recognized the interconnectedness of all things. They believed that everything was imbued with a spiritual essence and that humans had a responsibility to live in harmony with nature. For example, the Taoists in China developed a philosophy that emphasized balance and harmony with nature. Similarly, the indigenous peoples of Australia believed that they were caretakers of the land and had a responsibility to protect it for future generations. Modern society can learn from these practices and adopt a more spiritual approach to life.

For part 1 The narrator's attitude toward elite New York society is one of critical observation. The language used is not overtly negative, but it conveys a sense of detachment and distance from the world being described.

What about other options?

Wharton uses words such as "pressed," "expected," "obliged," "forced," and "plunged" to emphasize the sense of social obligation and duty that is placed upon the characters in the story. These words highlight the societal pressures and expectations that are at play, as well as the lack of agency that individuals have in the face of these pressures.

The young girl in the excerpt is portrayed as innocent and unassuming, in contrast to the jaded and world-weary individuals around her. She is described as having a "freshness and spontaneity" that sets her apart from the others.

The author foreshadows that problems will arise for the young girl depicted in the excerpt through the description of her surroundings. The opulence and excess of the world around her is described in detail, and the sense of superficiality and artifice that pervades the scene suggests that the young girl may struggle to find her place in this world.

Wharton's novel reflected overall trends in society because it depicted the tension between traditional social norms and the changing values of the early 20th century. The characters in the novel struggle with issues of class, gender, and identity, all of which were major themes of the time. Additionally, the novel captured the growing sense of disillusionment and dissatisfaction with the status quo, which was a hallmark of the period.

To know more about New York related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12164635

#SPJ1

Answer:

It is important to evaluate the current process and identify areas for improvement. Respect for the current process should not prevent us from seeking ways to make it more efficient and effective.

Explanation:

b. martin luther king, jr.

The name of which civil rights leader best completes the title of the graphic?The civil rights leader whose name best completes the title of the graphic is Martin Luther King,

Jr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the civil rights movement from 1954 until his assassination in 1968. A Black church leader and a son of early civil rights activist and minister Martin Luther King Sr., King advanced civil rights for people of color in the United States through nonviolence and civil disobedience. Inspired by his Christian beliefs and the nonviolent activism of Mahatma Gandhi, he led targeted, nonviolent resistance against Jim Crow laws and other forms of discrimination in the United States

Know more about Matin luther King here;

https://brainly.com/question/14384704

#SPJ11

Answer:The process discussed in the excerpt, which is different from the earlier decision to participate in the Spanish-American War, is the shift in the United States' foreign policy from isolationism to interventionism. During the Spanish-American War, the United States' decision to participate was motivated by a desire to expand its territorial influence and assert its dominance in the Western Hemisphere. In contrast, during World War I, the United States initially adopted a policy of neutrality and was hesitant to become involved in the conflict.

However, the excerpt explains that the United States' policy of neutrality was ultimately unsustainable due to technological advancements in communication and transportation. The telegraph, railroads, and steamships made it easier for information to travel quickly across the ocean, erasing the distance between the United States and Europe. This made it increasingly difficult for the United States to remain neutral, as it became impossible to ignore the impact of the war on global politics and the economy.

As a result, the United States shifted its foreign policy from isolationism to interventionism, recognizing that it could no longer remain isolated from world affairs. This shift led to the United States' entry into World War I, as it recognized the importance of its role as a global power and the need to protect its interests and influence in the world.

The comanche, navajo, modoc, and lakota sioux characterized by the greatest light cavalry that the world had ever seen.

In the annals of the American West, the Comanche, Navajo, Modoc, and Lakota Sioux were four of the most significant Native American groups. Each of these groups had distinctive qualities that distinguished them from one another and aided in preserving their individual heritage.

The fact that they were all expert and powerful fighters, though, is a generalisation that could be made about all four of these groups.

One of the most typical descriptions of these groups was as outstanding light cavalry troops. This was especially true for the Comanche and Lakota Sioux, who were famous for their skill with horses and proficiency with bows and arrows and other weaponry.

There were many tribes and all had one great quality but one thing which was common among all of them was that they all were great and skilled fighters not only on fighting but they were also great in negotiation.

To know more about comanche and navajo -

brainly.com/question/28379688

#SPJ4

Principles of Effective Informative Speeches includes accuracy, clarity, and interest is the key to your effectiveness as a speaker. Brings up other people when speaking in an instructive way.

Spatial. A spatial speech, which arranges important points in accordance with their physical and geographic relationships, is another method of organising a speech's points. When the importance of the main point is derived from its position or directional focus, the spatial style is an organisation style that is particularly helpful.

The organising patterns of topical, chronological, geographical, problem-solution, cause-and-effect, and Monroe's Motivated Sequence can all be used to order a speech's important ideas.

To know more about Informative Speech visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/12012927

#SPJ9

Answer: I think its was because they tried to prevent possible Japanese spying. It made the Japanese Americans felt shocked and scared worried.

Explanation: Hope this helps bae!! C;

Answer:In the summer of 1938, there was a refugee crisis in Europe as thousands of Jews were fleeing persecution and violence under Nazi rule. Countries like the U.S. responded to this crisis in different ways.

The U.S. government, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, was hesitant to take in large numbers of refugees due to concerns about potential security threats and the economic impact of accepting large numbers of immigrants. In 1938, the U.S. government convened the Evian Conference, which brought together representatives from 32 countries to discuss the refugee crisis. However, the conference failed to produce any concrete solutions, as most countries were reluctant to accept large numbers of refugees.

Despite this, the U.S. did take some measures to help refugees during this time. For example, the U.S. government established the Wagner-Rogers Bill in 1939, which would have allowed 20,000 German Jewish children to enter the U.S. However, the bill ultimately failed to pass due to opposition from anti-immigrant groups and politicians.

In addition to government efforts, there were also private initiatives to help refugees. One example is the Kindertransport, which was a program that helped transport thousands of Jewish children from Germany and Austria to the U.K. between 1938 and 1939. Private organizations and individuals also worked to provide financial and other forms of support to refugees.

Overall, while the U.S. did not take in large numbers of refugees during the summer of 1938, there were efforts made by both the government and private organizations to provide assistance to those in need. However, these efforts were limited by concerns about security, economic impact, and opposition from anti-immigrant groups.

The plantation style of agriculture was the southern economy mainstay of the South. Because there are more slaves in lower southern regions, the economic systems can also be distinguished by this fact.

Agriculture became the foundation of the southern colonies' economy (farming). Many of the nobles and businesspeople from London who immigrated to the southern colonies were wealthy individuals who hoped to increase their fortune through property ownership.

The slave economy was the main driver of the South's enormous wealth, nevertheless. The economic value of all the nation's factories and railroads combined in 1860 was greater than the value of slaves.

To know more about southern economy visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/7672865

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

are those in the civilian non institutional population age sixteen years or older who are employed or who are unemployed and seeking employment.

Answer:  1st century, 900CE, 11th century, 1600 CE, 18th century, 2023 CE.

Explanation:

Answer:

Many Americans worried that citizens of Japanese ancestry would act as spies or saboteurs for the Japanese government.

Answer: Six more states followed a month later and, by June, a total of 11 southern states were no longer part of the country. The secessionists claimed that - according to the Constitution - they had every right to leave the Union, but Lincoln vehemently refuted that assertion.

Explanation:

Aztec pyramids/temples are no longer "surviving" because of weather, climate change possibly, earthquakes, natural disasters etc, natural reasons basically.

In conclusion Failed. Consent of the governed. Failed. Rights of the Minority. Failed. Separation of Power. Failed. Constitution. Failed. Rule of Law.

Why it is?

Fujimori's government interfered with elections.

Failed limit: Consent of the governed

The principle of consent of the governed holds that the government should derive its power from the people it governs, and its actions should be in the best interest of the people. By interfering with the elections, Fujimori's government failed to uphold this principle, as the people were not able to freely choose their leaders.

Fujimori's government ignored the rights of suspected terrorists.

Failed limit: Rights of the Minority

One of the fundamental principles of democracy is the protection of individual rights, even for those who may be seen as unpopular or controversial. By ignoring the rights of suspected terrorists, Fujimori's government failed to uphold this principle and failed to protect the rights of a minority group.

Fujimori dissolved Peru's Congress

Failed limit: Separation of Power

The principle of separation of power is a cornerstone of modern democracy, and it entails that the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government should be kept separate to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. By dissolving the Congress, Fujimori's government violated this principle, as the executive branch gained too much power over the legislative branch.

Fujimori ordered the Constitution to be ignored.

Failed limit: Constitution

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and is meant to provide a framework for how the government operates. By ignoring the Constitution, Fujimori's government failed to uphold this principle and violated the basic rule of law that underpins democratic societies.

Fujimori did what he wanted, regardless of the law.

Failed limit: Rule of Law

The principle of the rule of law holds that no one is above the law, and everyone, including government officials, must be held accountable to the law. By doing what he wanted regardless of the law, Fujimori's government failed to uphold this principle and showed a disregard for the law and its consequences.

To know more about Fujmori related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25008013

#SPJ1

The statement that is not correct is that Lord Ashburton was a longtime foe of America. Lord Ashburton was known for his friendly disposition towards the United States.

The claim that Lord Ashburton was a lifelong enemy of America is untrue. The British government selected Lord Ashburton, who was truly Alexander Baring, to mediate a resolution on several problems with the United States, including the boundary between Maine and Canada and the return of fugitives.

Baring's presence signalled an effort to normalise ties between the two nations because of his reputation as a diplomatic skill and friend to the United States. The other claims are accurate: During the Tyler administration, many Americans were outraged by the destruction of the American steamship Caroline and the liberation of slaves who had mutinied onboard the Creole.

Learn more about Lord Ashburton:

https://brainly.com/question/29515352

#SPJ4

The following things are included in the circuit court division of the legal system: has authority over a particular geographic area that is typically larger than one state

There are trials. Thirteen (13) courts are available. It has 179 judges. A jury may or may not hear the cases. None of these are interstate. The following things ARE NOT included in the circuit court division of the judiciary: Eight (8) justices and one (1) chief justice are present (This refers to the Supreme Court, which is a separate entity) Ninety-four (94) courts are available (This refers to the district courts) has authority over the entire nation (This refers to the Supreme Court, which has nationwide jurisdiction). It has authority over a particular geographic area that is typically larger than one state.

To Know more about Court Division Visit:

brainly.com/question/28994661

#SPJ1

Explanation:

three estates were the different classes in France at the time of the revolution

Farmers thought railroads were monopolies with extortionate rates that increased their debt.

Farmers believed The monopoly railways charged outrageous charges that escalated their debt. Because they wanted capable individuals who could handle such a task, they wanted the government to control the rates and operations of railroads. The Populist Party supported nationalising railroads as a way to stop private companies from taking advantage of the public. They held the opinion that a nationalised railway network would offer better service at lower costs, thereby assisting both farmers and consumers. In the Gilded Age, the Populist Party fought for economic and social justice, and railroads were seen as a crucial issue in that fight.

To Know more about Farmers Visit:

brainly.com/question/18390861

#SPJ1

Joana D'ark had a deep faith in her visions, which did little for her psychological well-being but caused her to perceive them as divine, religious, and the result of her devotion. On the other hand, late medieval spirituality alludes to Joana's status and the mockery she endured for wearing masculine clothing

Popular piety at this time was more emotional and experienced, with a focus on devotional rites including pilgrimage, saint adoration, and the usage of sacred items and imagery. Late medieval piety reflected this growing religious independence that was perceived as a threat to the established Church. The new religious practices and beliefs that emerged in Europe from around the 14th through the 16th centuries are referred to as "late medieval spirituality." The main characteristics of this epoch were an increase in personal piety and a shift toward more independent religious displays.

To learn more about medieval refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/3124896

#SPJ1

A nonprofit organization is the kind of advocacy group that might focus on helping people who are experiencing homelessness.

Nonprofit organizations are typically dedicated to social causes and are not driven by profit. Instead, they rely on donations, grants, and other forms of funding to support their operations and programs.Advocacy groups focused on homelessness might provide a range of services, including shelter, food, and medical care, as well as advocacy and outreach to help people access the resources they need. These organizations might also work to raise awareness about the root causes of homelessness and advocate for policy changes to address the issue.While for-profit businesses might also offer services to people who are homeless, their primary goal is to make a profit, which may limit their ability to fully address the needs of this vulnerable population.

To learn more about nonprofit click the link below:

brainly.com/question/29804121

#SPJ1

Answer:

The use of democracy in post-war Japan has been widely regarded as successful. After Japan's defeat in World War II, the country was occupied by the United States, which instituted a series of reforms aimed at democratizing and modernizing Japan's political and economic systems. These reforms included the adoption of a new constitution, which established a parliamentary system of government and guaranteed individual rights and freedoms. Since then, Japan has become a stable democracy with free and fair elections, a vibrant civil society, and a strong rule of law. Japan's democratic institutions have also helped to promote economic growth and prosperity, as well as social and cultural development. Overall, the use of democracy in post-war Japan has been a key factor in the country's success and stability, and remains an important aspect of Japanese society and politics today.