6. Word that describes the Mexican government
during this time

The wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam is a complex issue with arguments on both sides.

what does Hawks argue and what was the war?

Hawks argued that the US needed to contain the spread of communism and protect its allies in Southeast Asia. They believed that the US had a moral obligation to defend democracy and human rights against the threat of communism.

Doves, on the other hand, argued that the war was a costly and unnecessary intervention in a civil conflict that the US had no business in. They believed that the war was causing unnecessary death and suffering, and that the US should focus on domestic issues instead.

The war between the US and Vietnam, commonly known as the Vietnam War, was a conflict that took place from 1955 to 1975. The war began as a result of the US's involvement in the Cold War and its policy of containing the spread of communism. The US provided military and economic support to the South Vietnamese government, which was fighting against communist forces in the North led by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.

The war was marked by intense fighting, including guerilla warfare, bombing campaigns, and ground operations.

To know more about Vietnam War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4292602

#SPJ1

Nationalism, imperialism, economic rivalry, ideological disagreements, and geopolitical power struggles are some of the major elements that have contributed to global conflict from 1900 to the present.

Yet, the roots of this conflict are complicated and multidimensional. With the rise and fall of empires, the consequences of major economic crises, and the diffusion of novel ideas and technology, the relative importance of these factors has changed over time.

Recent decades have also seen the emergence of new potential drivers of conflict, including terrorism, environmental deterioration, and resource shortages.

Understanding these dynamics is crucial for creating a more peaceful and just world since, in the end, many different social, political, and economic forces interact and have an impact on the causes of international conflict.

Learn more about global conflict at

https://brainly.com/question/27867966

#SPJ4

Answer: Submarine aircraft carriers were developed by the Imperial Japanese Navy to a greater extent than any other navy, before and during World War II. In total, 42 were built. (Other sources say 47 were built but actually 42 were.)

Shays's Rebellion, an uprising in massachusetts And connecticut from August 1786 to February 1787 against oppressive economic conditions and exorbitant taxes.

Shays' Rebellion sped up calls for Articles reform, which ultimately led to the Convention In philadelphia of 1787. Washington was chosen as the Convention's president, and the result was the United States Constitution. In order to stop the execution of debt collection and foreclosure procedures, armed groups forced the closure of various courts. Revolt strives to topple and eliminate the oppressive power as well as the rules that go along with it, unlike rebellion, which typically aims to dodge and/or win concessions from it. Revolts aim for a revolution, whilst rebellions aim for resistance.

To know more about Shays' Rebellion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19692099

#SPJ1

The women's rights movement and the anti-slavery movement were closely related. The two movements shared many similarities in terms of their goals and tactics. The movements sought to end discrimination against oppressed groups and establish equality for all.

Here are three key points from the documents that support this argument.Document A highlights that Sojourner Truth was a woman and a former slave. Truth was an important figure in both movements and advocated for the rights of both women and African Americans. This connection shows that the two movements were not mutually exclusive and could work together towards a common goal.Document B, on the other hand, shows how some people in the anti-slavery movement did not support women's participation in their cause. Reverend Harvey argued that women should not participate in the World Anti-Slavery Convention.

However, this does not discredit the broader connection between the two movements. In fact, it highlights the tensions between the two groups and suggests that the women's rights movement was fighting for a broader social change that would benefit all oppressed groups.

Finally, both documents speak to the shared goals of the two movements. Document A shows that Truth was advocating for women's suffrage and the abolition of slavery, two goals that were also central to the anti-slavery movement. Document B highlights that the anti-slavery movement was fighting against the oppressive system of slavery, a system that was founded on the exploitation of African Americans and women.

The fact that both movements were fighting for equality and justice shows that they were closely related.In conclusion, the women's rights movement and the anti-slavery movement were related. Both movements shared similar goals and tactics in the fight for equality and social justice. While there were tensions between the two groups, they were ultimately working towards a common goal.

For more questions on The women's rights movement

https://brainly.com/question/3245147

#SPJ8

The main reason that the Texas Constitution of 1876 would have pleased many former Confederates is that it reduced the power of the state government and limited the rights of African Americans.

It provided few restrictions on corporations and limited government interference in the economy. It also extended voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous status as a Confederate soldier.

The Texas Constitution of 1876 removed the Reconstruction-era requirements that the state's governor and lieutenant governor be of different political parties.

This meant that former Confederates, who largely held a single political affiliation, were more likely to be represented in government.

Furthermore, African Americans had few rights and few options for legal recourse against oppression. The limited government interference in the economy was also attractive to former Confederates, as it allowed them to remain economically successful and autonomous.

Finally, the extension of voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous Confederate status, was a major draw for former Confederates.

To know more about Confederates click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/11649223#

#SPJ11

Gloria Steinem was a key advocate of feminist policies in the 1970s.

She was a feminist activist and journalist who co-founded Ms. Magazine in 1972. She was one of the most visible faces of the women's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s.

Steinam was a prominent feminist leader who founded the National Women's Political Caucus, served as president of the feminist organization Voters for Choice, and established the Ms. Foundation for Women, which provides grants to women's groups throughout the country.

Therefore the key advocate of feminist policies is "gloria steinem."

To know more about Gloria Steinem click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16578908

#SPJ11

In my opinion it is fair that every state gets two senate seats because the system of providing every state with two Senate seats was established as part of the United States Constitution so that smaller states have an equal say in government.

The idea behind it was to ensure that smaller states have an equal say in the legislative process, rather than being dominated by larger, more populous states.

This system is often debated and criticized by some who argue that it can result in disproportionate representation, with some smaller states having more influence than their population would suggest. On the other hand, others believe that it's important to protect the interests of less populated states and to maintain the federalist structure of the US government.

Learn more about senate at:

https://brainly.com/question/747425

#SPJ1

Answer:  No.

Explanation:

Hope It Helps

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new political system had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party is Multi-party system, the correct option is (a).

The election saw the emergence of two major political parties: the Democratic Party, which supported Andrew Jackson, and the National Republican Party, which backed John Quincy Adams. This was a significant departure from the previous political landscape, which had been dominated by a single political party, the Democratic-Republican Party.

The emergence of multiple political parties marked the beginning of a multi-party system in the United States, which has since become a defining feature of American politics. The two-party system that emerged in 1828 has persisted to this day, with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party dominating American politics, the correct option is (a).

To learn more about Republican Party follow the link:

brainly.com/question/1204107

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the republican party. Multiple choice questions.

a. Multi-party system

b. System of regional alliances

c. Variable-party system

The Great Compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resolved the issue of representation in Congress, specifically how the number of representatives each state would receive in both legislative houses.

The compromise created a bicameral Congress, with the House of Representatives based on proportional representation based on population, and the Senate with each state receiving two representatives regardless of population.

This compromise allowed states with small populations to be represented equally in Congress, while still allowing states with larger populations to have more representation.

To know more about Federalists click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28563784#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Article Summary:

According to an article published by Reuters in December 2021, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that executing prisoners with severe dementia or mental illness is unconstitutional. The article presents evidence showing that the court's decision is based on the idea that executing individuals with severe dementia or mental illness violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The article also highlights how some U.S. states, including Texas and Alabama, continue to execute prisoners with severe mental illnesses. This article is significant in that it highlights the ongoing debate surrounding capital punishment and the ethical implications of executing individuals with mental illnesses.

Link to the article: https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-supreme-court-bars-executions-prisoners-severe-dementia-2021-12-06/

Compare/Contrast:

The information presented in the article aligns with the Ethics textbook chapter's argument that capital punishment is ethically problematic due to the possibility of executing innocent people, racial and economic bias, and mental health issues. The Ethics textbook chapter further argues that the death penalty is often a form of institutionalized violence that targets marginalized communities. The article highlights how the Supreme Court's decision to prohibit the execution of individuals with severe mental illnesses is a step towards reducing the ethical concerns surrounding the death penalty. However, the article also shows how some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, indicating that much work still needs to be done to address the ethical issues surrounding capital punishment.

Reaction:

The article is both surprising and encouraging. It is encouraging to see that the Supreme Court recognizes the ethical implications of executing individuals with severe mental illnesses and that they have taken a step towards prohibiting such executions. However, it is concerning to see that some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, despite the ethical implications. This article highlights the need for continued debate and activism surrounding the death penalty, particularly in relation to the ethical concerns it raises. It is vital that we continue to work towards a more just and equitable criminal justice system that ensures that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect.

Although it was incredibly difficult to survive the Rwandan genocide, some victims were able to flee or hide from the assailants.

Many moderate Hutus and Tutsis fled to refugee camps in nearby nations including Burundi, Tanzania, and Uganda. Others sought safety from the violence in temples, mosques, or educational institutions. Some were protected by strangers, acquaintances, or family members who put their own lives in danger to keep them hidden. Individuals who managed to survive the genocide frequently struggled to rebuild their lives after the bloodshed stopped due to the unfavorable living circumstances in refugee camps. Many survivors are still dealing with the effects of the genocide's trauma today.

Learn more about Rwandan genocide here:

brainly.com/question/20996958

#SPJ9

Answer:

Your answer would be : William Lloyd Garrison

Explanation:

A man of moral authority, Douglass developed into a charismatic public speaker. Prominent abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison recognized his oratory skill and hired him as a speaker for the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society.

Source From : www.nps.gov!

I have also done this quiz and found that it was correct! Wishing you the best of luck!

Answer:

The last kings of Judah were Zedekiah, Jehoiakim, Jehoahaz, and Josiah. These kings ruled during the time period from around 640 BCE to 586 BCE. Their rule was marked by political instability and conflict, as Judah was caught between the competing empires of Babylon and Egypt.

One notable aspect of the rule of the last kings of Judah was their failure to follow God's commands. The prophet Jeremiah, who lived during this time period, spoke out against the kings and the people of Judah for their disobedience. In Jeremiah 2:8, God says, "The priests did not say, 'Where is the Lord?' Those who handle the law did not know me; the shepherds transgressed against me; the prophets prophesied by Baal and went after things that do not profit."

The kings of Judah also struggled to maintain their independence from foreign powers. For example, in 609 BCE, King Josiah attempted to stop the advance of the Egyptian army, but was killed in battle. After Josiah's death, his son Jehoahaz ruled for just three months before being deposed by the Egyptian pharaoh, who installed his own puppet king, Jehoiakim, on the throne. Jehoiakim was later overthrown by the Babylonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, who took many of the people of Judah into exile in Babylon.

Despite their failures, the last kings of Judah did have some things in common. For example, they all struggled to balance their allegiance to God with the political realities of their time. They also faced the challenge of ruling a small kingdom in the midst of larger, more powerful empires.

The lives of the last kings of Judah had a significant impact on the people of Judah. Their disobedience to God's commands led to a time of great turmoil and suffering, as the people were taken into exile and their homeland was destroyed. However, their stories also serve as a reminder of the consequences of disobedience and the importance of following God's commands.

In conclusion, the rule of the last kings of Judah was marked by political instability, conflict, and disobedience to God's commands. While they all faced unique challenges, they shared the struggle to balance their allegiance to God with the political realities of their time. Their lives as rulers had a significant impact on the people of Judah, leading to a time of great turmoil and suffering. However, their stories also serve as a reminder of the consequences of disobedience and the importance of following God's commands.

Explanation:

BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!

Answer:

(no plagiarism)

Explanation:

Josiah, Zedekiah, Jehoiakim, and Jehoahaz served as Judah's final kings. These monarchs held power between roughly 640 and 586 BCE. Political unrest and conflict characterized their rule because Judah was sandwiched between the rival empires of Babylon and Egypt.

The failure of the final Judahi monarchs to obey God's precepts was one significant characteristic of their governance. During this time, the prophet Jeremiah condemned the kings and the people of Judah for their disobedience. God declares in Jeremiah 2:8, "The priests did not ask, 'Where is the Lord?'" The shepherds violated me, and those in charge of the law were unaware of me. The rulers of Judah similarly struggled to keep their nation free from outside influences. For instance, King Josiah sought to halt the Egyptian army's march in 609 BCE but was killed in combat. After Josiah's passing, his son Jehoahaz held the kingdom for about three months before being overthrown by the Egyptian pharaoh, who replaced him with Jehoiakim, his puppet king. Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, overthrew Jehoiakim later on and exiled numerous Judahite citizens to Babylon. The final Judah kings shared some traits despite their failings. They all strove, for instance, to strike a balance between their adherence to God and the political circumstances of their time. They also had to deal with the difficulties of governing a little kingdom amid much bigger and more formidable empires.

The final Judahi monarchs' lives had a profound effect on the people of Judah. The people were exiled and their nation was destroyed as a result of their disobedience to God's laws, which caused a period of intense instability and misery. Their experiences also serve as a warning about the repercussions of disobedience and the significance of keeping God's instructions.

In conclusion, political unrest, war, and disobedience to God's commands characterized the reign of Judah's last kings. They all encountered different difficulties, but they all struggled to strike a balance between their adherence to God and the political realities of their time. The people of Judah experienced a period of enormous upheaval and suffering as a result of their actions as kings. Their experiences also serve as a warning about the repercussions of disobedience and the significance of keeping God's instructions.

The Reformation movement in the sixteenth century led to the establishment of Protestantism.

The Reformation was a movement in the 16th century that saw the emergence of Protestantism. This movement was triggered by Martin Luther's 95 Theses, which were a series of criticisms of the Catholic Church.

The Reformation was characterized by the development of new denominations, which emphasized the importance of the Bible in the life of the believer. The Reformation Movement in the sixteenth century led to the establishment of Protestantism.

Protestantism is a form of Christianity that emphasizes the importance of salvation by faith alone, the authority of the Bible, and the priesthood of all believers. Protestantism is a term used to refer to a diverse range of churches that emerged after the Reformation, including Lutheran, Anglican, Presbyterian, and Baptist.

To know more about Protestantism, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/11855941#

#SPJ11

During the Civil War, Nashville had a population of approximately 16,000 to 18,000 white citizens and approximately 4,000 to 5,000 black citizens.

During the Civil War, Nashville, Tennessee played a significant role as a strategic city in the Western Theater. Initially occupied by Union forces in February 1862, the city became a vital supply and transportation hub for the Union army.

The city also served as a major center for recruiting and training African American soldiers, who would go on to play a crucial role in the war. In December 1864, the Confederate Army attempted to retake Nashville, but were defeated in the Battle of Nashville. After the war, Nashville became a symbol of Reconstruction in the South, as the city experienced significant growth and economic development.

Read more about Nashville

brainly.com/question/29411067

#SPJ1

Answer:

Is this a question?

Explanation:

Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s because of several reasons. For example, one of the reasons could be that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 had been passed, and these laws were crucial in ending legal segregation and ensuring voting rights for African Americans.

Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s because of several reasons. For example, one of the reasons could be that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 had been passed, and these laws were crucial in ending legal segregation and ensuring voting rights for African Americans.

Another reason could be that the movement had achieved its major goals, such as desegregation and voting rights, and the focus shifted to other issues such as poverty and war. On the other hand, some historians may argue that the Civil Rights Movement did not end in the late 1960s for various reasons.

One reason could be that even though legal segregation had ended, segregation in other forms such as housing and education still existed, and these issues required continued activism. Additionally, while African Americans had gained voting rights, voter suppression still occurred, and this issue needed further attention. Another reason could be that the movement had a lasting impact on American society, and the struggle for civil rights continued in various forms after the 1960s.
Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s due to the following reasons:
1. Major legislation: The passage of key civil rights legislation, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, addressed many of the movement's primary goals related to ending racial segregation and discrimination.
2. Assassination of key leaders: The assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 and Malcolm X in 1965 removed influential voices from the movement, potentially weakening its momentum.
3. Shift in focus: The 1960s saw a shift in focus towards other social issues such as the anti-Vietnam War movement, the feminist movement, and the environmental movement, which may have diverted attention away from civil rights issues.

On the other hand, other historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement did not end in the late 1960s due to the following reasons:

1. Continued struggles for equality: Racial disparities in areas such as education, income, and criminal justice persisted beyond the 1960s, indicating that the fight for civil rights was not yet over.
2. Ongoing activism: Civil rights activism continued after the 1960s with organizations such as the Black Panthers, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the NAACP continuing their work towards racial equality.
3. Modern-day civil rights movements: Contemporary movements, such as Black Lives Matter, suggest that the struggle for civil rights is still ongoing and has evolved to address current challenges faced by marginalized communities.
In conclusion, some historians might argue that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s due to major legislative achievements and the loss of key leaders, while others might contend that it did not end because of ongoing activism and the persistence of racial disparities.

To know more about Civil Rights Movement.

visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10557348

#SPJ11

The Philippines has asserted its maritime rights over the West Philippine Sea based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and has recently filed several diplomatic protests against Chinese activities in the area.

The Philippines has a valid legal claim to the maritime areas within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and to certain maritime entitlements beyond that, such as a continental shelf. The Philippines has also taken a number of initiatives to defend its sovereign rights, including filing a case against China in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and conducting military exercises and drills in the area.

For such more question on United Nations:

https://brainly.com/question/909525

#SPJ11

Option C. Oars were not a technological advancement for helping sailors improve their sailing techniques.

Oars have been used for centuries as a means of propulsion for boats, but they do not improve sailing techniques.

On the other hand, the compass, astrolabe, and rudders are all technological advancements that have helped sailors improve their sailing techniques.

The compass helps sailors navigate and maintain their course, the astrolabe helps determine latitude, and the rudder helps with steering and maneuvering the boat.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that option C oars were not a technological advancement for helping sailor improve their sailing techniques.

learn more about sailing techniques: https://brainly.com/question/19351991

#SPJ1

Answer: Mainly newspapers from the 20th century will have a bold headline/ title on the front page. and would kind of add dramatic affect onto the title like:

Coca Cola Got Rid of The Cocaine in The Drink What Will Happen To The Franchise NOW?

then have the story behind it.

Explanation: I used to read old magazines with my great grandmother before she passed and kind of memorized how they got the attention of readers also it really was the peoples only way of knowing what is going on in the world before they had tv and even then, people would read the newspaper.

If this helps your welcome and if not, I'm sorry if you got it wrong.

Thank you.

The Treaty of Versailles led to World War 2 because the Germans and the allies felt that the Germans had been unfairly treated by the treaty due to the punishments and all they lost to the treaty

The Treaty of Versailles, signed on June 28, 1919, officially marked the end of World War I. The treaty imposed heavy reparations on Germany, stripped it of its territories, and forced it to accept the sole responsibility for the war.

The treaty left Germany in a state of economic and political instability, which ultimately led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the outbreak of World War II. In this essay, we will examine how the Treaty of Versailles contributed to the outbreak of World War II.

Body paragraph:

The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh reparations on Germany, which included the payment of billions of dollars in damages to the Allied powers. The economic burden of these reparations, coupled with the loss of territories and resources, left Germany in a state of economic distress. Inflation soared, unemployment rates skyrocketed, and poverty became widespread. The German people felt humiliated and bitter about the terms of the treaty, and their resentment fueled the rise of extremist political parties, such as the Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler.

Hitler promised to restore Germany's glory and reclaim its lost territories, and his rhetoric appealed to many Germans who were eager to regain their national pride. As Hitler rose to power, he began to violate the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by rearming Germany and annexing neighboring countries, which eventually led to the outbreak of World War II.

In conclusion, the Treaty of Versailles played a significant role in the outbreak of World War II. Its harsh terms left Germany in a state of economic and political instability, which ultimately paved the way for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Hitler's aggressive policies violated the terms of the treaty, leading to the eventual invasion of neighboring countries and the outbreak of war. The Treaty of Versailles serves as a reminder of the importance of finding a fair and equitable resolution to conflicts to prevent the rise of extremist ideologies and the outbreak of war.

Read more on treaty of Versailles here:https://brainly.com/question/3604628

#SPJ1

Answer: True

Explanation: President George Washington nominated Jay the first Chief Justice of the United States on September 24, 1789. serving as Chief Justice for five years, Jay resigned from the Supreme Court on June 29, 1795, and became Governor of New York.

During World War II, George Marshall oversaw the Army of the United States as its chief of staff. His wartime experiences impacted creation of the Marshall Plan, which utilised American resources to rebuild Europe and foster stability and economic progress.

On September 1, 1939, the day that Germany invaded Poland to start World War II, Marshall took the oath of office as chief of staff of the United States Army.

For his work on the Marshall Plan and other contributions to world peace and understanding, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in December 1953. On October 16, 1959, General Marshall passed away at Reed Army Hospital in Washington.

To know more about World War II visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ9

The Holodomor was a classicide committed against successful peasants and the Soviet Union during the 1920s and 1930s that resulted in the death of more than 6 million Soviets due to execution, prison camps, and the ensuing famine.

The Holodomor was a form of ethnic cleansing and genocidal famine conducted by the Soviet Union to suppress resistance and subjugate those who did not comply with Stalin’s orders.

Peasants were stripped of their land and possessions and prohibited from leaving their villages, leading to a devastating famine.

Millions of peasants were sent to labor camps or executed for resisting. Millions more died from malnutrition and starvation. This tragedy left a lasting legacy of suffering and death in the Soviet Union.

To know more about Soviet Union click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15776884#

#SPJ11

The photograph (Source 4) depicts a family of four tending to a "victory garden".

The family is posed in a very traditional way, with the mother and father in the center, a daughter on the left, and a son on the right. This suggests that the victory garden program was seen as a family activity, with all members of the family taking part in the effort.

This implies that the victory garden program was seen as a communal activity, where all members of society worked together to contribute to the war effort. It also suggests that the war efforts on the homefront were seen as a communal responsibility, where all members of society had a role to play.

She is posed with her hands on her hips, wearing a hat and apron, and smiling confidently. Her pose suggests that she is proud of the garden that she has planted and is confident in the success of the Victory Garden program.

The Victory Garden program was a response to food shortages during World War II and allowed citizens to grow their own fruits and vegetables in their backyards. This photo suggests the success of the program and the effort that citizens put into supporting the war effort on the home front. It also serves as a reminder of the commitment and patriotism of the citizens of the United States during the war effort.

To know more about World War II, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ4

Answer: a sharp rise in inflation-adjusted wages