Explanation:
"Fruit of the poisonous tree" is a legal term that refers to evidence that is obtained illegally or unlawfully. This principle holds that evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful or unconstitutional search, seizure, or interrogation is tainted and therefore inadmissible in court. The term is derived from the idea that evidence obtained from an illegal source is like a poisonous tree, where everything that grows from it is tainted and cannot be used.
Locard's Exchange Principle is a forensic principle that states that every contact leaves a trace. This principle was formulated by Dr. Edmond Locard, a French forensic scientist, in the early 20th century. According to the principle, whenever two objects come into contact with each other, there will be a transfer of materials between them. This transfer can include physical, biological, and chemical materials, such as fibers, hairs, DNA, and fingerprints. The principle is used in criminal investigations to link suspects to crime scenes, and to link objects found at the crime scene to suspects. By analyzing the materials exchanged during a contact, forensic scientists can establish a link between a suspect and a crime scene or victim.
How negative spactator may impact the game
Negative spectator may impact the game by being rude and violent towards players.
The different types of spectator aggression include verbal abuse, gesturing, physical violence, property damage, littering, and "warming up" or rushing the field. Public intoxication, student gatherings, ticket touting, and other factors can all contribute to spectator violence. At sporting events, spectators can also have a negative impact because they can be rude and abusive to athletes, which demotivates them or causes them to lose focus, which affects their performance.
The four consequences of bad behavior spectator are disorientation with regard to values. Inefficiency. high homicide rate. Slow development and low investment.
Learn more about Negative spectator at:
brainly.com/question/30816169
#SPJ4
judges serving longer terms are more likely than judges serving shorter terms to do which of the following?
Judges serving longer terms are more likely than judges serving shorter terms to have a greater sense of security in their jobs, so they may be less swayed by public opinion.
What do we understand by the term “judges serving longer terms”?
Long-term judges are those who serve longer terms in their offices. Such judges are more likely to be impartial and deliver justice according to their consciences rather than public sentiment.
What do you mean by “judges serving shorter terms”?
Short-term judges, on the other hand, are more likely to be swayed by public opinion, as they are still struggling to establish themselves in their roles and may feel insecure about their future prospects as judges.
What are the differences between short-term and long-term judges?
Judges serving longer terms are more likely than judges serving shorter terms to do the following things:They have a better understanding of the law and the legal system.They are more experienced and have a better understanding of human nature.They are more likely to be impartial and deliver justice without being swayed by public opinion.They are more likely to take a long-term view of their roles as judges and consider the future implications of their decisions.They are more likely to have a greater sense of security in their jobs, so they may be less swayed by public opinion.Thus, judges serving longer terms are more likely to be impartial in their decision-making, as they have a better understanding of the law, more experience, and a greater sense of job security.
For more such question on public opinion
https://brainly.com/question/29641370
#SPJ11
question: sue files a claim against rob under a theory of negligence. rob's best argument in defense of sue's claim is:
The potential defenses that Rob could use to respond to Sue's claim based on the assumption that Sue has filed a claim against Rob under a theory of negligence. Rob's best argument for protecting himself from Sue's claim is the defense of comparative negligence.
Rob's Best Argument in Defense of Sue's Claim- Rob might use a defense of contributory negligence, but this is less probable because it is rarely utilized in any jurisdiction. Because the contributory negligence defense is more commonly seen in fewer jurisdictions, comparative negligence is a better defense for Rob to use to safeguard himself from Sue's claim.
In comparative negligence, the court determines the degree of negligence of each party involved and proportionally distributes the responsibility for the incident. This defense places some of the blame on Sue, lowering the amount she could receive in compensation if she is found to be partly liable for the incident.
To know more about theory of negligence, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30652890#
#SPJ11
mark pushes don. don falls to the ground and breaks his arm. under the civil law, mark is liable to don for don's injury:
Under civil law, Mark is liable to Don for Don's injury because he acted in a way that caused harm. In this scenario, Mark pushed Don, which caused Don to fall and break his arm.
This is considered a tort, or wrongful act, since Mark acted in a way that resulted in harm to Don. The tort of negligence applies, which means that Mark acted in a careless or negligent way.
Under civil law, Don can bring a lawsuit against Mark to recover damages. He must prove that Mark acted in a negligent way and that Don suffered damages as a result. To do this, Don must show that Mark had a duty to act in a certain way, such as not pushing Don, that Mark breached that duty by pushing Don, and that Don suffered damages as a result.
If Don is successful in his lawsuit, he can recover damages from Mark. This could include medical bills, pain and suffering, and other related costs. He could also be compensated for his lost wages, if any, if he had to miss work due to his injury. Mark is liable for Don's injury under civil law, and Don can seek compensation for his damages in a civil lawsuit.
To know more about civil law refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507#
#SPJ11
define the term advocacy and mention three reasons why protestors in an advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protest.
Advocacy refers to the act of publicly supporting a particular cause or issue, and protestors in advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protests due to safety concerns, legal repercussions, and negative public perception.
Any action that promotes, urges, justifies, defends, or pleads on behalf of another person is referred to as advocacy.
What is Advocacy?Getting support from another individual to help you communicate your opinions and wishes and help you stand up for your rights is referred to as advocacy.
Your advocate is a person who supports you in this way. There are a number of reasons why protestors participating in an advocacy campaign should refrain from using violence. The three are security, legitimacy, and legality. By supplying policymakers with the data they need to make decisions and, in turn, influence legislation, advocates can have significant positive effects on the puiblic's health. Effective advocacy does not necessarily require protracted or complicated legislative procedure.
Therefore, we can conclude that advocacy is when person pleads on behalf of another.
Learn more about Advocacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29639066
#SPJ5
select the true statement about the restatement of the law of contracts. a.) it supersedes the uniform commercial code (ucc) when deciding contract cases relating to the sale of goods. b.) it codified a series of statutes that judges must now follow when deciding contract cases. c.) it clarified and simplified the case law that had developed around contract disputes by the early twentieth century. d.) it was drafted in 1932 and has not been revised since.
The correct statement about the Restatement of the Law of Contracts is that it clarified and simplified the case law that had developed around contract disputes by the early twentieth century. The Restatement is a law that was published in 1932 and has not been revised since. It does not supersede the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or codify a series of statutes.The correct answer is option C
The Restatement of the Law of Contracts was drafted by the American Law Institute in 1932. It provides a comprehensive set of rules and principles that govern the formation and enforcement of contracts. The Restatement covers a broad range of topics to the different types of remedies available for breach of contract.
In addition, the Restatement also covers issues related to the enforceability of contracts, such as the statute of frauds, and the impact of unconscionability, fraud, and other defenses.
Know more about Uniform Commercial Code here:
https://brainly.com/question/30031234
#SPJ11
What has been one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech? A) fewwe cases involving minors, B) fewer laws limiting minority rights. ,C) a more accurate election, D) a more informed society
Answer:
D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.
Which of the following best describes the GNU General Public License (GPL) that is associated with the Linux kernel source code?You can freely utilize, but not change, the Linux source code.The Linux source code remains freely availableto anybody who wants it.You need to pay a yearly fee to access and change the Linux source code.The Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications.
The source code for the Linux kernel is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use. The correct option is b).
Software programmes issued under the GNU GPL are allowed to be used, studied, shared, and modified for free.
Everybody who wants it can still access the Linux source code without paying anything. Those who use the Linux source code for non-commercial purposes can continue to do so for free.
A free software licence known as the GPL allows users to run, copy, distribute, study, change, and otherwise improve software that is covered by the GPL.
The GPL assures that any software updates or enhancements are also made available under the GPL for the benefit of others.
The Linux kernel source code is licensed under the GPL, which means that users have the freedom to use, study, share, and modify the software code. The GPL does not require users to pay a yearly fee to access or modify the Linux source code. Instead, it requires that any changes made to the code be released under the GPL.
Therefore, the Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications, but it can be modified and redistributed under the GPL.
To learn more about General Public License here:
https://brainly.com/question/30453074#
#SPJ11
complete question
Which of the following best describes the GNU General Public License (GPL) that is associated with the Linux kernel source code?
a) You can freely utilize, but not change, the Linux source code.
b) The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use.
c) You need to pay a yearly fee to access and change the Linux source code.
d) The Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications.
list three possible explanations as to why democracies have seen a substantial growth in government in the 20th century.
There are three possible explanations for the substantial growth of democracy in the 20th century is 1) Expansion of social services, 2) Rise of globalization, 3) Response to crises.
1. Expansion of social services: As democracies matured, citizens increasingly demanded improved social services such as healthcare, education, and welfare. Governments expanded their roles in these areas to address inequalities and ensure a higher standard of living for their citizens. This growth in social services led to a larger government presence and higher public spending.
2. Rise of globalization: The 20th century saw a significant increase in globalization, with countries becoming more interconnected economically, politically, and culturally. As a result, governments had to adapt to new challenges such as international trade, diplomacy, and coordination with other nations. This required expanding the role of the government to effectively deal with these new responsibilities.
3. Response to crises: Throughout the 20th century, democracies faced numerous crises, including the Great Depression, World War II, and the Cold War. To tackle these crises, governments expanded their roles, implementing new policies and programs to mitigate the impact of these events on their citizens. The crisis-driven growth of government became a lasting feature in many democracies, even after the crises subsided.
In conclusion, the substantial growth in democratic governments in the 20th century can be attributed to citizens' demands for expanded social services, the rise of globalization, and the need to respond to various crises. Each of these factors contributed to a larger government presence, with more responsibilities and greater public spending.
To learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021#
#SPJ11
while the elements of the texas criminal mischief statute and the texas graffiti statute overlap somewhat, the graffiti statute is directed largely toward property damage caused by the use of:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Texas graffiti statute is directed largely toward property damage caused by the use of "paint, an indelible marker, or an etching or engraving device." This statute specifically prohibits individuals from intentionally or knowingly making markings, inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings on someone else's property without their consent.
The Texas criminal mischief statute, on the other hand, covers a broader range of conduct that could damage or destroy someone else's property, including actions such as vandalism, destruction, tampering, or defacement. While the elements of the criminal mischief statute and the graffiti statute may overlap somewhat, the graffiti statute specifically targets the act of making marks or inscriptions on someone else's property using certain specific tools, such as paint, markers, or etching devices.
The graffiti statute is largely directed toward property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements.
Such implements are usually used to deface public and private property with writing, drawings, marks, etchings, or paintings. The graffiti statute provides additional penalties for graffiti offenses and allows for additional recovery of costs from the person who committed the offense.
Graffiti is a form of vandalism, and the Texas Graffiti Statute provides additional penalties for individuals convicted of this type of criminal mischief. The Statute also allows victims of graffiti to recover their costs for the removal of graffiti from property.
The Statute applies to property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements and provides enhanced penalties for those who commit graffiti offenses.
The Statute also requires that the graffiti be visible from a public area in order for the enhanced penalties to apply.
To know more about private property click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29613081#
#SPJ11
betty hunter, a patient at community health, fell out of bed. an incident report was created. betty's attorney is now seeking all records relevant to betty's fall. the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in:
According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in: medical records.
HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which was passed by the United States Congress. It includes a range of provisions that provide guidelines for how patient data can be protected and transmitted.
An incident report is a document used to describe an event that has happened within a healthcare facility, such as a fall. This report is important because it can provide valuable information to healthcare providers about how to prevent future accidents from occurring. Betty's incident report was created to document the circumstances surrounding her fall in the community health center.
Incident reports are not considered part of the official medical record because they are created to document safety and quality issues rather than for clinical purposes. Therefore, incident reports are usually not protected by HIPAA regulations and can be released to patients or their legal representatives upon request.
If the incident report is maintained in medical records, then it is likely to be protected by HIPAA. However, if the incident report is maintained separately from the medical records, then it is less likely to be protected from discovery by the patient or their legal representative. Therefore, the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in medical records.
For more such questions on incident report, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29635795
#SPJ11
Rights specifically granted to Congress by the federal Constitution is what
Answer: Express powers
Explanation:
Express powers powers are specifically granted to the federal government in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.
python in a governmental election, campaign officials may want to know what percentage of the population voted in the previous election
In a governmental election, campaign officials may want to know what percentage of the population voted in the previous election.
To obtain the percentage of the population that voted in the previous governmental election, the following formula is utilized: Percentage of the population that voted = (Number of votes cast / Total population) * 100The number of votes cast refers to the number of votes that were cast in the previous election, whereas the total population refers to the total number of individuals residing in the constituency where the election was held. The percentage of the population that voted in the previous election can be used by campaign officials to determine the number of votes they must earn to win the election.
In addition, this information can be utilized to determine the participation rate in the previous election and to evaluate the success of any efforts to raise voter turnout.
Read more about governmental election here:https://brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ11
When talking about an armed robbery case, a discussion about how explosives are made started. How can the discussion about explosives BEST be described in relation to the armed robbery case?
A.
relevant
B.
irrelevant
C.
interesting
D.
sophisticated
Answer:
Answer choice (B)
Explanation:
The discussion about explosives in relation to an armed robbery case can be considered as irrelevant unless there is evidence or suspicion that the perpetrator(s) used explosives in the commission of the crime. Otherwise, the discussion about explosives would not have any direct connection or relevance to the armed robbery case.
knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is important because the classification determines when the:
Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is important because the classification determines when the contract is legally binding. In general, a bilateral contract becomes legally binding as soon as both parties agree to the terms. By contrast, a unilateral contract only becomes legally binding when the other party accepts the offer and agrees to perform the action outlined in the contract.
Bilateral and unilateral contracts are two different kinds of contracts, each with its own set of legal implications. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties, each of which promises to do something in return for the other. In other words, both parties agree to exchange something of value. A unilateral contract, on the other hand, is a one-sided agreement in which only one party makes a promise.
Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is thus essential for understanding when it is legally binding and the potential legal implications of the contract.
Know more about legal implications here:
https://brainly.com/question/30194646
#SPJ11
How does American society reduce the impact of victimization to the underclass?
and
Why does society frequently fail to understand the full scope of crime victimization?
Answer:
answer 1. The American society can reduce the impact of victimization to the underclass by implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, providing education, job opportunities, and other resources to marginalized communities, increasing police accountability and community policing, providing accessible and affordable mental health and addiction services, and providing support and resources for victims of crime.
answer 2. Society frequently fails to understand the full scope of crime victimization due to lack of awareness or emphasis on certain types of crimes, political or social stigma associated with certain types of crime or victims, under-reporting of crimes due to fear of retaliation or distrust of law enforcement, and lack of attention or resources for victims after crime has occurred.
what is criminal law it is the body of law that defines criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders
Criminal law is the branch of law that regulates the behavior of individuals or groups and punishes those who violate the law. It is designed to protect society from criminal acts and punish those who commit them. Criminal law consists of a body of rules and regulations that define criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders.Criminal law serves several purposes. One of the most important is to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior.
Criminal law punishes those who break the law by imposing fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions. This helps to prevent crime and protect society. Criminal law also serves to protect individual rights by ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and justly when accused of a crime. This includes the right to a fair trial, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Criminal law is based on the principle of individual responsibility. This means that individuals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether they intended to commit a crime. Criminal law also distinguishes between different types of crimes.
Know more about criminal offenses here:
https://brainly.com/question/11112199
#SPJ11
In what ways might a person become a victim and need police assistance?
american express looks at historical transactions to predict consumer behaviors. by watching how current and past customers have used their credit, american express can predict churn and customer loyalty.
American Express looks at historical transactions to predict consumer behaviors. By watching how current and past customers have used their credit, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. This statement is True.
What is American Express?American Express is a financial services corporation. It is a global corporation that provides various financial products and services, including credit cards, travel-related services, and other services. American Express uses customer data to make strategic decisions and tailor its products and services to the customer's needs.
American Express uses transaction data to predict consumer behaviors. By analyzing transaction data, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. It also enables American Express to provide personalized recommendations and offers to its customers.
Historical transaction data analysis helps American Express to optimize its business operations. It helps the company to identify and address issues related to credit and customer service. American Express also uses transaction data analysis to identify high-risk customers and mitigate fraud.
American Express's transaction data analysis helps to understand customer behaviors and preferences. By analyzing customer behaviors, American Express can develop new products and services that meet customer needs.
American Express also uses transaction data analysis to provide personalized customer service and targeted marketing campaigns.
Learn more about American Express at
https://brainly.com/question/29680015
#SPJ11
Explain what do adults suggest about teenagers' perception of physical (1x2)(2) exercise.
steps in selling estate
Scenario: David is a patrol officer with the Dallas Police Department.
While patrolling southeast Dallas, Officer David sees a man running out
of a house on the corner of main and 3rd st. A woman stumbles out of the
house and yells, "Help! I have been robbed!" David immediately reports
the crime in progress to dispatch and requests a back up. The male enters
a dark green Chevrolet pick up and as the suspect pulls the vehicle onto
the roadway, Officer David follows the vehicle and asks dispatch to verify
the licene plates. Dispatch advises the vehicle belongs to Lonny Smith
who is well known by all of Dallas PD. as a hardened criminal who has
fired his weapon on more than three separate occasions in a battle to
resist arrest. Back up units arrive, Officer David and back up officers
initiate a felony stop. The suspect jumps out of the car and tries to run
away without displaying any type of weapon, are the officers justified in
displaying and using deadly force against the suspect? Why or why not
Answer:
Read Below:
Explanation:
Based on the scenario provided, it is not clear whether the officers are justified in using deadly force against the suspect as the suspect has not displayed any weapon. In general, the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers is only justifiable when the officer reasonably believes that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others.
In this case, while Lonny Smith is a known criminal who has previously fired his weapon during an arrest, he has not displayed any weapon or made any threatening gestures towards the officers. Therefore, the use of deadly force would be difficult to justify, and the officers should exhaust all other options before resorting to lethal force.
The officers should attempt to apprehend the suspect using less-lethal force, such as verbal commands, physical force, or non-lethal weapons like pepper spray or a Taser. If the suspect resists arrest or attempts to flee, the officers may pursue and attempt to apprehend him, but they should not use deadly force unless they reasonably believe that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to them or others.
It is important for law enforcement officers to use good judgment and follow established protocols when dealing with potentially dangerous situations to ensure that they uphold the law and protect both the public and themselves.
A seller and a purchaser signed a contract for the sale of a 60-year-old house. The contract required a general warranty deed to be given at closing. The contract was silent regarding the condition of the house, and the purchaser did not ask. The purchaser received a general warranty deed with all covenants of title at the closing and promptly recorded the deed. The seller made no disclosures to the purchaser regarding the condition of the property. Approximately one month after the closing, the furnace in the house stopped working, the basement flooded, and the roof leaked so badly that the second floor could not be occupied. The seller, when told of the house's condition, was genuinely surprised.
No, because the seller gave no disclosures regarding the condition of the house. Since there are no applicable statutes, we do not have any required disclosures. And since the seller did not make any disclosures, she cannot be liable for making an affirmative representation. Basically, since this jurisdiction seems to not require any disclosures, we are back to the days of "buyer beware".
The purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.
As per the given case, the seller and the purchaser signed a contract for the sale of a 60-year-old house. The contract required a general warranty deed to be given at closing. The contract was silent regarding the condition of the house, and the purchaser did not ask. The purchaser received a general warranty deed with all covenants of title at the closing and promptly recorded the deed. The seller made no disclosures to the purchaser regarding the condition of the property.
Approximately one month after the closing, the furnace in the house stopped working, the basement flooded, and the roof leaked so badly that the second floor could not be occupied. The seller, when told of the house's condition, was genuinely surprised. According to the law, the purchaser cannot hold the seller liable for the defects in the house since the seller gave no disclosures regarding the condition of the house. Also, there are no applicable statutes that require any disclosures. As the seller did not make any disclosures, she cannot be liable for making an affirmative representation.
The purchaser received the general warranty deed at closing, and since there were no additional disclosures made by the seller, the purchaser took the house "as is." Therefore, it is clear that the seller cannot be held liable for the defects in the house since there are no applicable statutes and no disclosures were made by the seller. In this jurisdiction, it is the purchaser's responsibility to conduct a proper inspection of the property before buying it. Thus, the purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.
For more such question on buyer beware
https://brainly.com/question/30539410
#SPJ11
which of the following is an accurate comparison of how the supreme court has applied the doctrine of selective incorporation? (4 points) before engel v. vitale (1962) after engel v. vitale (1962) (a) the establishment clause does not apply to the states. the establishment clause applies to the states. (b) the bill of rights does not apply to the states. the bill of rights applies to the states. (c) the establishment clause limits the actions of the state governments. the establishment clause limits the action of the federal government. (d) the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from the federal government. the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from state governments.
The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.
Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.
Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.
Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ11
some observers of less-developed countries use the term _____ to describe the unequal economic relationship between those countries and the former imperial power which used to control their territory.
Some observers of less-developed countries use the term neocolonialism to describe unequal economic relationship between those countries and the former imperial power which used to control their territory.
Neocolonialism is a concept that refers to the continued economic dependence of former colonies on their former colonial masters or their allies, despite the fact that they may have achieved independence from their respective colonizers. It is also referred to as "economic imperialism."
Neocolonialism involves a relationship between a relatively small, wealthy, and powerful group of countries, known as the “first world,” and a larger, less powerful, and less prosperous group of countries, known as the “third world.” This relationship allows the first world to dominate and exploit the third world economically, maintaining the latter's dependence on the former.
Imperialism refers to a system in which a strong nation-state attempts to extend its influence or authority over weaker nations or territories. Imperialism is characterized by a variety of practices, including the use of military force, economic exploitation, and cultural assimilation. European nations, particularly those with naval power, were responsible for the most extensive imperialistic activities during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
You can learn more about the economic relationship at: brainly.com/question/18772455
#SPJ11
taylor went to a s.f. giants baseball game. as she was seated in the stadium, prior to the game and during pregame warm-up, a baseball was thrown by a giant's player, buster posey, which flew over the head of another giant's player out of the playing field and struck tayor in the face, causing serious injury. taylor sued the giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw. the most likely outcome of this case is:
The most likely outcome of Taylor's case is that she would be awarded damages for her injury due to the Giants' negligence.
In order for her to prevail in her case, she must be able to show that the Giants had a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent her from being harmed, that they failed to do so, and that her injury was caused by that failure.
She must also show that her injury was the proximate result of their negligence, and that the damages that she incurred were a direct result of the negligence.
To prove negligence in this case, Taylor must show that the Giants had a duty of care to provide a safe environment for their fans and to prevent foreseeable harm. She must also prove that the Giants failed to act as a reasonably prudent person would have and that they breached their duty of care to her.
Finally, she must show that her injury was caused by the breach of their duty of care, that her damages are a direct result of their negligence, and that the damages she incurred were foreseeable by the Giants.
To know more about prudent click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/22082788#
#SPJ11
which of the following remedies provided by a court to a nonbreaching party requires each party to a contract to return the consideration given to the other? question 35 options: injunction novation rescission extradition restitution
The remedy that requires each party to a contract to return the consideration given to the other is rescission.
Rescission is the cancellation of a contract and the return of the parties to the same position they held prior to the contract.
This remedy is often used when one party has breached the contract, as it allows the non-breaching party to be put in the same position they were in before the contract was created.
It is important to note that in order for rescission to take place, both parties must give back the consideration they received from each other under the terms of the contract.
To know more about rescission click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30031740#
#SPJ11
What do you call the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court?
The person who is accusing another person or group of wrongdoing and bringing a lawsuit to court is called the plaintiff.
The plaintiff is the person who initiates a legal action by filing a complaint or petition in a court of law against another person or entity. The plaintiff is the party who is seeking legal remedies or relief for some harm or injury that they have suffered, and they must prove their case through evidence and arguments presented in court.
The plaintiff is responsible for bearing the burden of proof in a civil lawsuit, and their ultimate goal is to obtain a favorable judgment or settlement that compensates them for their losses or addresses their legal grievances.
Learn more about The plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/29213730
#SPJ4
Which of the following scenarios represents a violation of one of the civil
liberties protected by the Bill of Rights?
The scenario that represents a violation of one of the civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights is B. A state compels Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade
What are civil liberties ?The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and it protects a range of civil liberties for U.S. citizens.
Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade is a violation of a civil liberty protected by the Bill of Rights. This is because, it may conflict with the Amish community's religious beliefs and practices, and therefore could be challenged under the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom.
Find out more on civil liberties at https://brainly.com/question/28852814
#SPJ1
Options for this question include :
A law is passed in Congress which bans guns in schools because of the effect it has on interstate commerce B. A state compels Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade C. A state creates a racially gerrymandered district to meet requirements in the Voting Rights Act D. A school district segregates its students into schools based on the students’ racewhen a court issues an order that may either require or forbid a party to perform a specified act, the court has issued a(n) . quasi-contract injunction reformation rescission
Answer:
injuction
Explanation: